journal article·2018-08

Interpreting Atom Probe Data from Oxide–Metal Interfaces

Ingrid McCarroll, Barbara Scherrer, Peter Felfer, Michael P. Moody, Julie M. Cairney

Microscopy and Microanalysis· Volume 24· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Understanding oxide–metal interfaces is crucial to the advancement of materials and components for many industries, most notably for semiconductor devices and power generation. Atom probe tomography provides three-dimensional, atomic scale information about chemical composition, making it an excellent technique for interface analysis. However, difficulties arise when analyzing interfacial regions due to trajectory aberrations, such as local magnification, and reconstruction artifacts. Correlative microscopy and field simulation techniques have revealed that nonuniform evolution of the tip geometry, caused by heterogeneous field evaporation, is partly responsible for these artifacts. Here we attempt to understand these trajectory artifacts through a study of the local evaporation field conditions. With a better understanding of the local evaporation field, it may be possible to account for some of the local magnification effects during the reconstruction process, eliminating these artifacts before data analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.09.00710.1016/j.ultramic.2017.09.007 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.08423910.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.084239 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.12.02410.1016/j.corsci.2017.12.024 ↗
4. Three-dimensional investigation of ceramic/metal heterophase interfaces by atom-probe microscopy10.1007/S100050010050 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.01.00410.1016/j.ultramic.2011.01.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/0039-6028(82)90434-410.1016/0039-6028(82)90434-4 ↗
7. 10.1017/S143192760404048610.1017/S1431927604040486 ↗
8. 10.1557/mrs.2015.31310.1557/mrs.2015.313 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.01610.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.016 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.00610.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.006 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.01.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.01.009 ↗
12. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3436-810.1007/978-1-4614-3436-8 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.359233910.1063/1.3592339 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03421.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03421.x ↗
15. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/03303110.1088/1367-2630/18/3/033031 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.06.00210.1016/j.ultramic.2015.06.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.00710.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.007 ↗
18. 10.1557/mrs.2015.31110.1557/mrs.2015.311 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2016.01.00310.1016/j.surfrep.2016.01.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.12.01610.1016/j.cpc.2014.12.016 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mser.2003.09.00110.1016/j.mser.2003.09.001 ↗
22. 10.1021/jz500259c10.1021/jz500259c ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.07.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2016.07.008 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.09.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.09.028 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0339110.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03391 ↗
26. 10.1557/mrs.2015.30710.1557/mrs.2015.307 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.04.07910.1016/j.tsf.2015.04.079 ↗
28. 10.1017/S143192761101253010.1017/S1431927611012530 ↗
29. Mechanism of breakaway oxidation of Fe–Cr and Fe–Cr–Ni alloys in dry and wet carbon dioxide
30. 10.1149/1.356972710.1149/1.3569727 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cossms.2013.09.00310.1016/j.cossms.2013.09.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.02.00510.1016/j.ultramic.2015.02.005 ↗