journal article·2016-12

High‐strength nanostructured black‐silicon wafer for photovoltaic applications

Chia‐Liang Hsu, Amarendra Kumar, Kunal Kashyap, Te‐Husan Peng, Max Ti‐Kuang Hou, Jer‐Liang Andrew Yeh

Micro & Nano Letters· Volume 11· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Silicon nanostructures can improve the bending strength of wafers, but often trap particle contaminates. A double‐sided surface nanostructure with a morphology controlled via wet chemical etching is used to both improve the mechanical strength and reduce surface reflection. Compared with a conventional polished silicon wafer, the bending strength was increased by 3.4 times and the surface reflection was reduced to 1%, and so can provide a promising solution for photovoltaic applications. The optically unused side of the wafer was protected by a thin silicon layer that prevented the entrapment of particles that might cause glitches in subsequent fabrication processes, all the while maintaining the enhancement in strength. The particle test confirmed that incorporating protection layer intacts the particle count with polished silicon sample.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Nanoengineering and Microsystems National Tsing Hua University No. 101, Section 2, Kuang‐Fu Road Hsinchu 30013 Taiwan

Department of Mechanical Engineering National United University No. 2, Lienda Miaoli 36063 Taiwan

Department of Power Mechanical Engineering National Tsing Hua University No. 101, Section 2, Kuang‐Fu Road Hsinchu 30013 Taiwan

Instrument Technology Research Center National Applied Research Laboratories 20, R&D Road VI, Hsinchu Science Park Hsinchu 30076 Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/PROC.1982.1233110.1109/PROC.1982.12331 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.256.5063.153710.1126/science.256.5063.1537 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.05.00910.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.05.009 ↗
4. 10.1109/66.47517910.1109/66.475179 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.8958010.1063/1.89580 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms344110.1038/ncomms3441 ↗
7. Elimination of strength degrading effects caused by surface microdefect: a prevention achieved by silicon nanotexturing to avoid catastrophic brittle fracture
8. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.11710.1038/nphoton.2009.117 ↗
9. 10.2217/nnm.12.10610.2217/nnm.12.106 ↗
10. 10.1038/nnano.2012.16610.1038/nnano.2012.166 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl100161z10.1021/nl100161z ↗
12. 10.1109/LED.2015.243970110.1109/LED.2015.2439701 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0021‐9797(03)00053‐510.1016/S0021‐9797(03)00053‐5 ↗
14. Evaluation of extreme ultraviolet mask defect using blank inspection, patterned mask inspection, and wafer inspection
15. JiangA.L.X.MingL.C.GaoJ.C.Y.et al.: ‘Silicon wafer backside thinning with mechanical and chemical method for better mechanical property’.IEEE 2006 pp.1–410.1109/ICEPT.2006.359813 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20100178410.1002/adma.201001784 ↗
17. ‘Standard test methods for bend testing of metallic flat materials for spring applications involving static loading’. ASTM E855 2013
18. HsiehC.M.ChyanJ.HsuW.‐C.et al.: ‘Fabrication of wafer‐level antireflective structures in optoelectronic applications’.IEEE 2007 pp.185–18610.1109/OMEMS.2007.4373902 ↗
19. 10.1117/1.326571610.1117/1.3265716 ↗