journal article·2024-12-11

A Combinatorial Approach with Microneedle Pretreatment and Thermosensitive Gel Loaded with Rivastigmine Lipid Nanoparticle Formulation Enables Brain Delivery via the Trigeminal Nerve

Andi Dian Permana, Muhammad Alif Sya’ban Mahfud, Miftakul Munir, Arni Aries, Amal Rezka Putra, Ahsanal Fikri, Herlan Setiawan, Isa Mahendra, Asep Rizaludin, Anugerah Yaumil Ramadhani Aziz, Yulia Yusrini Djabir, Aryadi Arsyad, Yahdiana Harahap, Wahyu Dita Saputri, Ria Fajarwati, Noviyan Darmawan

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 49
Publisher page

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) often leads to dementia, causing cognitive decline and increased care needs. Rivastigmine (RV) is a key AD treatment, but its brain delivery is limited by the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Aside from oral, olfactory, and intradermal injection (i.d.) routes, the application of polymeric microneedles via the trigeminal nerve on the facial skin as a pretreatment, followed by a solid lipid nanoparticle RV-loaded thermosensitive gel (PMN-SLN-RV-TG), is an alternative to deal with the problems. This study aims to determine the optimal formula for PMN-SLN-RV-TG application and assess its brain delivery ability compared to conventional routes. The optimum SLN-RV formula had a particle size <200 nm and sustained release for 72 h, which was selected for the SLN-RV-TG formulation. SLN-RV-TG was transformed into a gel at normal skin temperature (32–37 °C), with good physical properties and nontoxic behavior. The ideal PMN formula was able to penetrate the dermal layer as an alternative to i.d. administration. Ex vivo dermatokinetics showed significant improvement of PMN-SLN-RV-TG application ( p < 0.05) compared to without PMN application. In vivo pharmacokinetic studies on rats also revealed that the PMN-SLN-RV-TG had superior pharmacokinetic parameters ( C max, AUC, t 1/2, and MRT) compared to other groups ( p < 0.05). Radiolabeling SLN-RV with 99m Tc showed good physical properties, with a radiochemical yield of >95%. In vivo distribution studies of PMN-SLN-RV-TG application exhibited a higher brain:blood ratio than i.v. administration after 5 h, as well as being safe for the brain due to a good histological profile. These results show that PMN-SLN-RV-TG application via the trigeminal nerve on the facial skin has strong potential delivery to the brain for AD treatment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Dermatology and Skin Diseases

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Pharmacy, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, South Sulawesi Indonesia

Research Center for Radioisotope Radiopharmaceutical and Biodosimetry Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency of Indonesia, KST. BJ Habibie, South Tangerang 15314, Indonesia

Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, South Sulawesi Indonesia

Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, West Java Indonesia

Research Center for Quantum Physics, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), South Tangerang 15314, Indonesia

Research Center for Genetic Engineering, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Cibinong Bogor 16911, West Java Indonesia

Department of Chemistry, IPB University, Bogor 16680, West Java Indonesia

Funding

Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional · Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.10708210.1016/j.nlm.2019.107082 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.17010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.170 ↗
3. 10.1002/14651858.CD001191.pub410.1002/14651858.CD001191.pub4 ↗
4. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1411229610.3390/pharmaceutics14112296 ↗
5. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1103012910.3390/pharmaceutics11030129 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.01110.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.011 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1421629110.3390/ma14216291 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.10253310.1016/j.jddst.2021.102533 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.02410.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.024 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addr.2021.11382610.1016/j.addr.2021.113826 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11095-016-1875-710.1007/s11095-016-1875-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.05.00110.1016/j.jconrel.2017.05.001 ↗
13. 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.414910.2500/ajra.2015.29.4149 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20120086410.1002/adfm.201200864 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.00410.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.004 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.07810.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.078 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.07.00210.1016/j.ejps.2015.07.002 ↗
18. 10.1517/17425247.2014.93533510.1517/17425247.2014.935335 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.10237710.1016/j.jddst.2021.102377 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nano.2009.04.00710.1016/j.nano.2009.04.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.05.01210.1016/j.ejps.2016.05.012 ↗
22. Mohanty D. · Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. · 2018 · 50 · 175
23. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1002004010.3390/pharmaceutics10020040 ↗
24. 10.1080/03639045.2016.122575410.1080/03639045.2016.1225754 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.03810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.038 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.12430710.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124307 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.10518310.1016/j.jddst.2023.105183 ↗
28. 10.3390/nano1004071810.3390/nano10040718 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.10461110.1016/j.jddst.2023.104611 ↗
30. ICCVAM-Recommended Test Method Protocol: Hen’s Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) Test Method. http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/ocutox/MildMod-TMER.htm.
31. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c0064710.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00647 ↗
32. 10.1007/s13346-021-00986-710.1007/s13346-021-00986-7 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jddst.2017.09.02110.1016/j.jddst.2017.09.021 ↗
34. 10.1002/smll.20170192110.1002/smll.201701921 ↗
35. 10.1208/s12249-015-0440-810.1208/s12249-015-0440-8 ↗
36. 10.1007/s42452-021-04609-110.1007/s42452-021-04609-1 ↗
37. 10.1002/cplu.20200049610.1002/cplu.202000496 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.12232310.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122323 ↗
40. 10.1080/10717544.2022.215896410.1080/10717544.2022.2158964 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11626810.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116268 ↗
42. 10.3390/ma410186110.3390/ma4101861 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e0536510.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05365 ↗
44. Walfish, S. Analytical Methods: A Statistical Perspective on the ICH Q2A and Q2B Guidelines for Validation of Analytical Methods TYPES OF ANALYTICAL METHODS; 2006. http://www.biopharminternational.com/biopharm/content/printContentPopup.jsp?id=392483.
45. Vinardell, M. P. Ocular Irritation Assessed in Vitro by a Hemolysis and Hemoglobin Denaturation Test; 2018. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=91920306.
46. 10.1016/j.fct.2006.10.02410.1016/j.fct.2006.10.024 ↗
47. 10.1590/S1516-8913201200030000810.1590/S1516-89132012000300008 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11176210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111762 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.11301810.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113018 ↗
50. 10.3390/cosmetics803006910.3390/cosmetics8030069 ↗
51. 10.1111/srt.1271110.1111/srt.12711 ↗
52. 10.1186/s40543-016-0105-610.1186/s40543-016-0105-6 ↗
53. 10.3390/polym1306093310.3390/polym13060933 ↗
54. 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b0069110.1021/acschemneuro.9b00691 ↗
55. 10.1097/RLU.000000000000341010.1097/RLU.0000000000003410 ↗
56. 10.2147/IJN.S32579110.2147/IJN.S325791 ↗
57. 10.1515/RACT-2019-320810.1515/RACT-2019-3208 ↗
58. Rathmann S. M. · 2019 · 31110.1007/978-3-319-98947-1_18 ↗
59. 10.1524/RACT.2007.95.12.70910.1524/RACT.2007.95.12.709 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.11410.1016/j.msec.2017.02.114 ↗
61. 10.3390/polym1316281510.3390/polym13162815 ↗
62. 10.1039/C6RA26759A10.1039/C6RA26759A ↗
63. 10.1089/cbr.2008.058410.1089/cbr.2008.0584 ↗
64. 10.1002/jlcr.57510.1002/jlcr.575 ↗
65. 10.1063/5.017284010.1063/5.0172840 ↗
66. 10.1007/BF03164615/METRICS10.1007/BF03164615/METRICS ↗