journal article·2024-09-11Open access

Human Skeletal Muscle Myoblast Culture in Aligned Bacterial Nanocellulose and Commercial Matrices

Melina Mastrodimos, Saumya Jain, Maryam Badv, Jun Shen, Hossein Montazerian, Claire E. Meyer, Nasim Annabi, Paul S. Weiss

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 36

Abstract

Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) is a durable, flexible, and dynamic biomaterial capable of serving a wide variety of fields, sectors, and applications within biotechnology, healthcare, electronics, agriculture, fashion, and others. BNC is produced spontaneously in carbohydrate-rich bacterial culture media, forming a cellulosic pellicle via a nanonetwork of fibrils extruded from certain genera. Herein, we demonstrate engineering BNC-based scaffolds with tunable physical and mechanical properties through postprocessing. Human skeletal muscle myoblasts (HSMMs) were cultured on these scaffolds, and in vitro electrical stimulation was applied to promote cellular function for tissue engineering applications. We compared physiologic maturation markers of human skeletal muscle myoblast development using a 2.5-dimensional culture paradigm in fabricated BNC scaffolds, compared to two-dimensional (2D) controls. We demonstrate that the culture of human skeletal muscle myoblasts on BNC scaffolds developed under electrical stimulation produced highly aligned, physiologic morphology of human skeletal muscle myofibers compared to unstimulated BNC and standard 2D culture. Furthermore, we compared an array of metrics to assess the BNC scaffold in a rigorous head-to-head study with commercially available, clinically approved matrices, Kerecis Omega3 Wound Matrix (Marigen) and Phoenix as well as a gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel. The BNC scaffold outcompeted industry standard matrices as well as a 20% GelMA hydrogel in durability and sustained the support of human skeletal muscle myoblasts in vitro. This work offers a robust demonstration of BNC scaffold cytocompatibility with human skeletal muscle cells and sets the basis for future work in healthcare, bioengineering, and medical implant technological development.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States

Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 410 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada

Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States

Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, California 90024, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States

Funding

University of California, Los Angeles · National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10570-012-9799-910.1007/s10570-012-9799-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.03110.1016/j.msec.2013.07.031 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.02510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.00110.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001 ↗
5. 10.7555/JBR.35.2021003610.7555/JBR.35.20210036 ↗
6. 10.1155/2015/28078410.1155/2015/280784 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.10754910.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107549 ↗
8. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-03393010.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033930 ↗
9. 10.1111/1751-7915.1338610.1111/1751-7915.13386 ↗
10. 10.1104/pp.110.16124010.1104/pp.110.161240 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00935.x10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00935.x ↗
12. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0005810.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00058 ↗
13. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.24510.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.245 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41598-020-80448-110.1038/s41598-020-80448-1 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.10936510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109365 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.17110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.171 ↗
17. 10.1088/2053-1591/abe01610.1088/2053-1591/abe016 ↗
18. 10.1088/1748-605X/ac2b7a10.1088/1748-605X/ac2b7a ↗
19. 10.1007/s10439-010-9999-010.1007/s10439-010-9999-0 ↗
20. 10.3390/bioengineering704011810.3390/bioengineering7040118 ↗
21. 10.3390/polym1321382110.3390/polym13213821 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00772-018-0428-210.1007/s00772-018-0428-2 ↗
23. 10.1097/PRS.000000000000933810.1097/PRS.0000000000009338 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1311248310.3390/ma13112483 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00464-011-1899-310.1007/s00464-011-1899-3 ↗
26. Ghanashyam, A.; Cryatal, S. S.; Glenn, S. B.; Jose, C. F. Multifunctional Biomesh for Surgical Hernia Repair, US 20,220,192,811 A1, 2022. https://lens.org/073-606-828-979-461.
27. 10.1007/s00423-017-1639-910.1007/s00423-017-1639-9 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.3c0002110.1021/acsmaterialsau.3c00021 ↗
29. 10.1111/1751-7915.1338710.1111/1751-7915.13387 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e0012510.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00125 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0360010.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03600 ↗
32. 10.1021/bm100684k10.1021/bm100684k ↗
33. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0135110.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01351 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0101510.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01015 ↗
35. 10.1021/bm500524s10.1021/bm500524s ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.01010.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.010 ↗
37. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2014107610.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20141076 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.04310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.043 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c0100610.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01006 ↗
40. 10.1152/physrev.00043.201110.1152/physrev.00043.2011 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.036 ↗
42. 10.1159/00044392510.1159/000443925 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.03810.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.038 ↗
44. 10.5435/00124635-201102001-0000710.5435/00124635-201102001-00007 ↗
45. 10.1007/s11605-022-05248-610.1007/s11605-022-05248-6 ↗
46. 10.1007/s00192-007-0446-110.1007/s00192-007-0446-1 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2020.10008110.1016/j.mtbio.2020.100081 ↗
48. 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318213960210.1097/SLE.0b013e3182139602 ↗
49. 10.1021/bm990017d10.1021/bm990017d ↗
50. 10.1006/jsre.1998.549510.1006/jsre.1998.5495 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b0167510.1021/acs.biomac.9b01675 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0065-2423(04)38002-910.1016/S0065-2423(04)38002-9 ↗
53. 10.1002/smll.20190223210.1002/smll.201902232 ↗