journal article·2024-05-01Open access

Crystalline Si Surface Passivation with Nafion for Bulk Defects Detection with Electron Paramagnetic Resonance

Kejun Chen, Steve W. Johnston, P. Craig Taylor, David W. Mulder, Harvey L. Guthrey, William Nemeth, San Theingi, Matthew Page, Markus Kaupa, David L. Young, Sumit Agarwal, Paul Stradins

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 17

Abstract

In monocrystalline Si (c-Si) solar cells, identification and mitigation of bulk defects are crucial to achieving a high photoconversion efficiency. To spectroscopically detect defects in the c-Si bulk, it is desirable to passivate the surface defects. Passivation of the c-Si surface with dielectrics such as Al 2 O 3 and SiN x requires deposition at elevated temperatures, which can influence defects in the bulk. Herein, we report on the passivation of different Czochralski (Cz) Si wafer surfaces by an organic copolymer, Nafion. We test the efficacy of the surface passivation at temperatures ranging from 6 to 473 K to detect bulk defects using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. By comparing with state-of-the-art passivation layers, including Al 2 O 3 and liquid HF/HCl, we found that at room temperature, Nafion can provide comparable passivation of n-type Cz Si with an implied open-circuit voltage ( iV oc ) of 713 mV and a recombination current prefactor J 0 of 5 fA/cm 2 . For p-type Cz Si, we obtained an iV oc of 682 mV with a J 0 of 22.4 fA/cm 2 . Scanning electron microscopy and photoluminescence reveal that Nafion can also be used to passivate the surface of c-Si solar cell fragments scribed from a solar cell module by using a laser. Consistent with previous studies, analysis of the EPR spectroscopy data confirms that the H-terminated surface is necessary, and fixed negative charge in Nafion is responsible for the field-effect passivation. While the surface passivation quality was maintained for almost 24 h, which is sufficient for spectroscopic measurements, the passivation degraded over longer durations, which can be attributed to surface SiO x growth. These results show that Nafion is a promising room-temperature surface passivation technique to study bulk defects in c-Si.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States

Funding

National Renewable Energy Laboratory · Solar Energy Technologies Office

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C5EE03380B10.1039/C5EE03380B ↗
2. 10.1088/2516-1083/ab0fa810.1088/2516-1083/ab0fa8 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-6463/aaac6d10.1088/1361-6463/aaac6d ↗
4. 10.1002/solr.20210060510.1002/solr.202100605 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.05510.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.055 ↗
6. Smith, D. D.; Reich, G.; Baldrias, M.; Reich, M.; Boitnott, N.; Bunea, G. In Silicon Solar Cells with Total Area Efficiency Above 25%, 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 5–10 June; IEEE, 2016; pp 3351–3355.10.1109/PVSC.2016.7750287 ↗
7. Graff, K. Metal Impurities in Silicon-Device Fabrication; Springer Science & Business Media, 2013; pp 1–4.
8. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.95-96.18710.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.95-96.187 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.10120110.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101201 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.04710.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.047 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.05.03410.1016/j.solmat.2018.05.034 ↗
12. 10.1002/pip.336210.1002/pip.3362 ↗
13. 10.1002/pip.295410.1002/pip.2954 ↗
14. 10.1002/pip.467002040210.1002/pip.4670020402 ↗
15. 10.1088/0268-1242/17/1/30610.1088/0268-1242/17/1/306 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00099-410.1016/S0927-0248(00)00099-4 ↗
17. 10.1116/1.472820510.1116/1.4728205 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.06.01810.1016/j.solmat.2013.06.018 ↗
19. 10.1002/pssr.20160008010.1002/pssr.201600080 ↗
20. 10.1016/0169-4332(93)90112-O10.1016/0169-4332(93)90112-O ↗
21. 10.1143/JJAP.41.L87010.1143/JJAP.41.L870 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.24910.1103/PhysRevLett.57.249 ↗
23. 10.3791/5361410.3791/53614 ↗
24. 10.1002/pssr.20170024310.1002/pssr.201700243 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.6b0782210.1021/acsami.6b07822 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.482730310.1063/1.4827303 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0103810.1021/acsnano.9b01038 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.8b1737910.1021/acsami.8b17379 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.354442110.1063/1.3544421 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.367544910.1063/1.3675449 ↗
31. 10.1149/2.0111911jss10.1149/2.0111911jss ↗
32. 10.1002/aesr.20220015410.1002/aesr.202200154 ↗
33. Guo, J.H.; Cotter, J.; McIntosh, K.; Fisher, K.; Chen, F.; Karpour, A. Edge Passivation for Smaill-Area, High Efficiency Solar Cells 2023.
34. 10.1149/2.003202jss10.1149/2.003202jss ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.50410.1103/PhysRevLett.65.504 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.01410.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.014 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0044810.1021/acsanm.1c00448 ↗
38. Rahman M. Z. · Int. J. Renewable Energy Res. · 2012 · 2 · 117
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.16520210.1103/PhysRevB.86.165202 ↗
40. 10.1143/JJAP.31.181710.1143/JJAP.31.1817 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10689910.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106899 ↗
42. Stokkan, G.; Isenberg, J.; Biro, D.; Warta, W.; Hagen, G. In Nafion Polymer Film as a Low-Temperature Passivation for Lifetime Measurements on Silicon Wafers, 19th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, 2004; pp 769–772.
43. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.00510.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.005 ↗
44. Ramspeck, K. In Light Induced Degradation of Rear Passivated mc-Si Solar Cells, 27th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, 2012; pp 861–865.
45. Fokuhl, E.; Naeem, T.; Schmid, A.; Gebhardt, P.; Geipel, T.; Philipp, D. In Letid -A Comparison Of Test Methods On Module Level, 36th European PV Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition; Marseille, France, 2020.
46. Chang, T.T. Detection of Phosphorus in Epitaxial Silicon by EPR; U.S. Army ERADCOM, 1979.10.6028/NBS.IR.79-1748 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.1624510.1103/PhysRevB.55.16245 ↗
48. 10.1143/JJAP.10.164110.1143/JJAP.10.1641 ↗
49. 10.1002/pssa.221140021710.1002/pssa.2211400217 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0039-6028(99)00712-810.1016/S0039-6028(99)00712-8 ↗
51. 10.1149/1.242870710.1149/1.2428707 ↗
52. 10.1016/0079-6816(83)90006-010.1016/0079-6816(83)90006-0 ↗
53. 10.1039/D1EE01788H10.1039/D1EE01788H ↗
54. 10.1063/1.11072710.1063/1.110727 ↗
55. 10.1016/0038-1098(92)90092-N10.1016/0038-1098(92)90092-N ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.983410.1103/PhysRevB.40.9834 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.08.01310.1016/j.jmr.2005.08.013 ↗
58. 10.1016/S0927-0248(01)00094-010.1016/S0927-0248(01)00094-0 ↗
59. 10.1116/1.59030110.1116/1.590301 ↗
60. Wolf, A.; Mack, S.; Brosinsky, C.; Hofmann, M.; Saint-Cast, P.; Biro, D. In Impact of Thin Intermediate Thermal Oxide Films on the Properties of PECVD Passivation Layer Systems, 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 19–24 June; IEEE, 2011; pp 3568–3572.10.1109/PVSC.2011.6185917 ↗