journal article·2024-01-31

Ion Selectivity in Multilayered Stacked Nanoporous Graphene

Niketa A. K, Shishir Kumar

Publisher page

Abstract

Nanoporous graphene is an ideal candidate for molecular filtration as it can potentially combine high permeability with high selectivity at molecular levels. To make use of graphene in filtration setups, the defects formed during its growth and during the transfer of graphene to the carrier support pose a challenge. These uncontrolled pores can be avoided by stacking graphene layers, and then, controlled pores can be initiated with oxygen plasma. Here, we show that two-layer stacks provide the best balance of defect coverage and high selectivity compared with other stacks. Using the electrical characterization of ionic solutions in the standard diffusion cell, we compare the ionic transport and ionic selectivity of up to three-layered stacks of graphene that have been plasma-treated. We find that there is a decrease in the ionic selectivity of a two-layered stack as one more layer of graphene is added. We provide a model for this occurrence. Our results will be helpful for making practical and high-performance filtration systems from two-dimensional materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Membrane Separation Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Hyderabad 502284, Telangana, India

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.120048810.1126/science.1200488 ↗
2. 10.1039/B714128A10.1039/B714128A ↗
3. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.01210.1016/j.rser.2014.01.012 ↗
4. 10.1038/nnano.2012.110.1038/nnano.2012.1 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11880910.1016/j.memsci.2020.118809 ↗
6. 10.1021/jp206258u10.1021/jp206258u ↗
7. 10.1021/nl902194610.1021/nl9021946 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aab053010.1126/science.aab0530 ↗
9. 10.1021/jz100748x10.1021/jz100748x ↗
10. 10.1021/jz100240r10.1021/jz100240r ↗
11. 10.1021/nl301285310.1021/nl3012853 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl101046t10.1021/nl101046t ↗
13. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.115887710.1126/science.1158877 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.489263810.1063/1.4892638 ↗
16. 10.1021/nl102069z10.1021/nl102069z ↗
17. 10.1021/nl801457b10.1021/nl801457b ↗
18. 10.1126/science.124909710.1126/science.1249097 ↗
19. 10.1021/nn303869m10.1021/nn303869m ↗
20. 10.1021/nn405537u10.1021/nn405537u ↗
21. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.175410.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.1754 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.121169410.1126/science.1211694 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.117124510.1126/science.1171245 ↗
24. 10.1021/nn900371t10.1021/nn900371t ↗
25. 10.1021/nl901829a10.1021/nl901829a ↗
26. 10.1021/nn200105j10.1021/nn200105j ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ohx.2020.e0016510.1016/j.ohx.2020.e00165 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.333709110.1063/1.3337091 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20180042310.1002/anie.201800423 ↗
30. 10.1039/C9RA03025E10.1039/C9RA03025E ↗
31. 10.1088/0957-4484/25/12/12550110.1088/0957-4484/25/12/125501 ↗
32. 10.1088/2053-1583/aa57fc10.1088/2053-1583/aa57fc ↗
33. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.10.04910.1016/j.bios.2016.10.049 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.07010.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.070 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp203010z10.1021/jp203010z ↗
36. 10.1103/physrevlett.97.18740110.1103/physrevlett.97.187401 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.01510.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.015 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.16810.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.168 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.03.02810.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.03.028 ↗
40. 10.1021/nn901275310.1021/nn9012753 ↗
41. Hille B. · 2001
42. Schultz S. · 1980