journal article·2024-01-17

Adhesion Characterization and Enhancement between Polyimide-Silica Composite and Nodulated Copper for Applications in Next-Generation Microelectronics

Sagar M. Doshi, Alexander Barry, Alexander Schneider, Nithin Parambil, Catherine Mulzer, Mobin Yahyazadehfar, Aref Samadi-Dooki, Benjamin Foltz, Keith Warrington, Richard Wessel, Lei Zhang, Christopher Simone, Gregory S. Blackman, Mark A. Lamontia, John W. Gillespie

Publisher page

Abstract

As the need for high-speed electronics continues to rise rapidly, printed wiring board (PWB) requirements become ever-more demanding. A typical PWB is fabricated by bonding dielectric films such as polyimide to electrically conductive copper foil such as rolled annealed (RA) copper and is expected to become thinner, flexible, durable, and compatible with high-frequency 5G performance. Polyimide films inherently feature a higher coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) than copper foils; this mismatch causes residual thermal stresses. To attenuate the mismatch, silica nanoparticles may be used to reduce the CTE of PI. A nodulated copper surface can be used to enhance the Cu/PI adhesion by additional bonding mechanisms that could include a type of mechanical bonding, which is a focus of this study. In this investigation, a 90° peel test was used to measure the peel strength in copper/polyimide/copper laminates containing nodulated copper and polyimide reinforced with 0, 20, and 40 wt % silica nanoparticles. The influence of silica nanoparticles on the peel strength was quantitatively evaluated. Laminates incorporating polyimide films lacking silica nanoparticles had a ∼3.75× higher peel strength compared with laminates reinforced with 40% silica. Their failure surfaces were analyzed by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to identify the mode of failure and to understand bonding mechanisms. The key bonding mechanism, mechanical interlocking, was achieved when the polyimide surrounded or engulfed the copper nodules when the laminate was created. Post-testing failure surface analysis revealed the presence of copper on the polyimide side and polyimide on the copper side, indicating mixed mode failure. An analytical model was developed to determine the impact of applied pressure, temperature, and time on the polyimide penetration and mechanical interlocking around the copper nodules. The model was validated by measuring the peel strength on another set of specimens fabricated using increased temperature and pressure that showed a 3× increase in peel strength compared to lower temperature/pressure processing conditions. This enhanced adhesion resulted from the lower polymer material viscosity at higher temperatures, which fosters deeper and more complete penetration around the copper nodules during processing at higher pressures for longer durations. The methodology of combining peel testing, viscosity and CTE measurement, SEM/EDX, surface chemical analysis, and penetration depth calculation developed herein enables the calculation of the desired processing parameters to enhance functionality and improve adhesion.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Synthesis and properties of polymers · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Composite Materials, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States

DuPont Specialty Products USA LLC, Wilmington, Delaware 19803, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States

Funding

DuPont

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1163/156856190X0061210.1163/156856190X00612 ↗
2. 10.1163/156856187X0033710.1163/156856187X00337 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.01610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.016 ↗
4. 10.1163/156856197X0028210.1163/156856197X00282 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.partic.2011.09.00910.1016/j.partic.2011.09.009 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.01.02210.1016/j.tsf.2008.01.022 ↗
7. 10.1002/APP.2254510.1002/APP.22545 ↗
8. 10.1163/156856196X0049010.1163/156856196X00490 ↗
9. 10.1163/156856194X0030210.1163/156856194X00302 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.03.08010.1016/j.tsf.2012.03.080 ↗
11. Suzuki, Y. Surface Treated Copper Foil. JP 4833556 B2, 2005.
12. Cheng, K.; Sheng, Y. Surface Treatment Electrolytic Copper Foil and Wireless Charging Method for Flexible Printed Circuit Board. JP 6421222 B2, 2016.
13. 10.1016/j.mee.2007.05.06310.1016/j.mee.2007.05.063 ↗
14. 10.12677/ms.2020.10504410.12677/ms.2020.105044 ↗
15. 10.1295/polymj.24.10710.1295/polymj.24.107 ↗
16. 10.1039/c4ra04952g10.1039/c4ra04952g ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.07.03410.1016/j.jiec.2022.07.034 ↗
18. ASTM D6862, Standard Test Method for 90 Degree Peel Resistance of Adhesives, 2021: West Conshohocken, PA, 19428–2959 US. https://www.astm.org/d6862-11r21.html.
19. 10.1007/s10921-019-0573-x10.1007/s10921-019-0573-x ↗
20. 10.1021/ma002191w10.1021/ma002191w ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.16710.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.167 ↗
22. 10.1021/cm980428l10.1021/cm980428l ↗
23. McKnight, S. H. Influence of Surface Modification on the Processing and Performance of Aluminum Adhesive Joints Bonded with Thermoplastic Polymers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Delaware, 1995.
24. 10.1007/BF0001263510.1007/BF00012635 ↗