Effect of Interfacial SiOx Defects on the Functional Properties of Si-Transition Metal Oxide Photoanodes for Water Splitting
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The transfer of photogenerated charges through interfaces in heterojunction photoanodes is a key process that controls the efficiency of solar water splitting. Considering Co 3 O 4 /SiO x /Si photoanodes prepared by physical vapor deposition as a representative case study, it is shown that defects normally present in the native SiO x layer dramatically affect the onset of the photocurrent. Electron paramagnetic resonance indicates that the signal of defects located in dangling bonds of trivalent Si atoms at the Si/SiO x interface vanishes upon vacuum annealing at 850 °C. Correspondingly, the photovoltage of the photoanode increases to ≈500 mV. Similar results are obtained for NiO/SiO x /Si photoanodes. Photoelectrochemical analysis and impedance spectroscopy (in solution and in the solid state) indicate how the defect annealing modifies the Co 3 O 4 /SiO x /Si junction. This work shows that defect annealing at the solid–solid interface in composite photoanodes strongly improves the efficiency of charge transfer through interfaces, which is the basis for effective solar-to-chemical energy conversion.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physics and Astronomy Department, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 8, Padova I-35131, Italy
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 1, Padova I-35131, Italy
Funding
Ministero dell'Universit? e della Ricerca · Universit? degli Studi di Padova
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aad192010.1126/science.aad1920 ↗
2. 10.1039/C8CS00638E10.1039/C8CS00638E ↗
3. 10.1038/ncomms1596810.1038/ncomms15968 ↗
4. 10.1039/D0NR08414J10.1039/D0NR08414J ↗
5. 10.1039/C6EE03505A10.1039/C6EE03505A ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-021-24229-y10.1038/s41467-021-24229-y ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.6b0718810.1021/jacs.6b07188 ↗
8. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.4510.1038/nenergy.2017.45 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat479410.1038/nmat4794 ↗
10. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0352010.1021/acscatal.8b03520 ↗
11. 10.1021/ja501513t10.1021/ja501513t ↗
12. 10.1039/C9EE02766A10.1039/C9EE02766A ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat445110.1038/nmat4451 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41563-019-0488-z10.1038/s41563-019-0488-z ↗
15. 10.1038/nmat362610.1038/nmat3626 ↗
16. 10.1039/C5EE01687H10.1039/C5EE01687H ↗
17. 10.1039/C5EE03655K10.1039/C5EE03655K ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.5b0981610.1021/acsami.5b09816 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.1c2095110.1021/acsami.1c20951 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.enchem.2020.10003910.1016/j.enchem.2020.100039 ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.2c1051510.1021/jacs.2c10515 ↗
22. 10.1116/1.59030110.1116/1.590301 ↗
23. Stesmans, A.; Afanas’ev, V. V. In Characterization of Semiconductor Heterostructures and Nanostructures 2nd ed. Lamberti, C., Agostini, G., Eds. Elsevier: Oxford, 2013; pp 685–752.10.1016/B978-0-444-59551-5.00016-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15355210.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153552 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.208682510.1149/1.2086825 ↗
26. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0389910.1021/acscatal.9b03899 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.209544610.1149/1.2095446 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.bios.2010.07.05010.1016/j.bios.2010.07.050 ↗
29. Ghita R. · 2011
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.1624510.1103/PhysRevB.55.16245 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.1580110.1103/PhysRevB.58.15801 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.359729810.1063/1.3597298 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.33381910.1063/1.333819 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1174710.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11747 ↗
35. Bisquert J. · 201410.1201/b17613 ↗
36. Sze S. · 200610.1002/0470068329 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0089210.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00892 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0447810.1021/acsomega.1c04478 ↗