journal article·2023-03-15

Effect of Lithium Substitution Ratio of Polymeric Binders on Interfacial Conduction within All-Solid-State Battery Anodes

Dong Ok Shin, Hyungjun Kim, Jaecheol Choi, Ju Young Kim, Seok Hun Kang, Young-Sam Park, Maenghyo Cho, Yong Min Lee, Kyeongjae Cho, Young-Gi Lee

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Problematic issues with electrically inert binders have been less serious in the conventional lithium-ion batteries by virtue of permeable liquid electrolytes (LEs) for ionic connection and/or carbonaceous additives for electronic connection in the electrodes. Contrary to electron-conductive binders used to maximize an active loading level, the development of ion-conductive binders has been lacking owing to the LE-filled electrode configuration. Herein, we represent a tactical strategy for improving the interfacial Li + conduction in all-solid-state electrolyte-free graphite (EFG) electrodes where the solid electrolytes are entirely excluded, using lithium-substitution-modulated (LSM) binders. Finely tuning a lithium substitution ratio, a conductive LSM–carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) binder is prepared from a controlled direct Na + /Li + exchange reaction without a hazardous acid involvement. The EFG electrode employing LSM with a maximum degree of substitution of lithium (DS Li ) of ∼68% in our study shows a considerably higher rate capability of 1.05 mA h cm –2 at 1 C and a capacity retention of ∼61.9% after 200 cycles at 0.5 C than those using sodium-CMC (Na-CMC) (0.78 mA h cm –2, ∼49.5%) and LSM with ∼35% lithium substitution (0.93 mA h cm –2, ∼55.4%). More importantly, the correlation between the phase transition near the bottom region of the EFG electrode and the state of charge (SOC) is systematically investigated, clarifying that the improvement of the interfacial conduction is proportional to the DS Li of the CMC binders. Theoretical calculations combined with experimental results further verify that creating the continuous interface through abundant pathways for mobile ions using the Li + -conductive binder is the enhancement mechanism of the interfacial conduction in the EFG electrode, mitigating serious charge transfer resistance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Intelligent Sensors Research Section, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), 218 Gajeongno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea

Department of Advanced Materials and Device Engineering, University of Science and Technology (UST), 217 Gajeongno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro 1, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea

Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Republic of Korea

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States

Funding

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute · Institute of Civil-Military Technology Cooperation

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0024110.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00241 ↗
2. 10.1039/c8ee00640g10.1039/c8ee00640g ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.11513710.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115137 ↗
4. 10.1002/anie.20120156810.1002/anie.201201568 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0358310.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03583 ↗
6. 10.1038/srep1443310.1038/srep14433 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.02.01210.1016/j.joule.2018.02.012 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20120398110.1002/adma.201203981 ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20190293810.1002/aenm.201902938 ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20140182610.1002/aenm.201401826 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.8b0161410.1021/acsami.8b01614 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.0c1874310.1021/acsami.0c18743 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20140126910.1002/adfm.201401269 ↗
14. 10.1002/inf2.1218510.1002/inf2.12185 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11431710.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114317 ↗
16. 10.1002/aenm.20150100810.1002/aenm.201501008 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20170231410.1002/aenm.201702314 ↗
18. 10.1002/ente.20150025010.1002/ente.201500250 ↗
19. 10.1149/2.0581504jes10.1149/2.0581504jes ↗
20. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab856b10.1149/1945-7111/ab856b ↗
21. 10.1016/s0167-2738(02)00889-510.1016/s0167-2738(02)00889-5 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.06910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.069 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.01.01110.1016/j.matt.2022.01.011 ↗
24. 10.1021/am502736m10.1021/am502736m ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.04.02110.1016/j.polymer.2018.04.021 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.07210.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.072 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.083 ↗
28. 10.1039/c7ee00534b10.1039/c7ee00534b ↗
29. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0081610.1021/acsenergylett.1c00816 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.6b0335710.1021/acsami.6b03357 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41524-018-0064-010.1038/s41524-018-0064-0 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.0c1205210.1021/acsami.0c12052 ↗
33. 10.1002/advs.20170007210.1002/advs.201700072 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13881910.1016/j.cej.2022.138819 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.01310.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.013 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.09810.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.098 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.02810.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.028 ↗
38. 10.1038/srep1805310.1038/srep18053 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.11.01310.1016/j.chempr.2018.11.013 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0162810.1021/acsenergylett.0c01628 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0108910.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01089 ↗
42. 10.1002/aenm.20200132010.1002/aenm.202001320 ↗
43. 10.1126/science.abg721710.1126/science.abg7217 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.04.02910.1016/j.ensm.2022.04.029 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0085110.1021/acs.iecr.8b00851 ↗
46. 10.1007/s13233-015-3094-110.1007/s13233-015-3094-1 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.09710.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.097 ↗
48. 10.1021/ac50056a03210.1021/ac50056a032 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.elecom.2022.10733610.1016/j.elecom.2022.107336 ↗
50. Morrison R. T. · 1992
51. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0106310.1021/acsenergylett.1c01063 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.02210.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.022 ↗
53. 10.1039/c8ee02373e10.1039/c8ee02373e ↗
54. 10.1149/2.1511714jes10.1149/2.1511714jes ↗
55. 10.1002/aenm.20190252310.1002/aenm.201902523 ↗
56. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
57. 10.1103/physrevb.54.1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
58. 10.1103/physrevlett.77.386510.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.00510.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.005 ↗
61. 10.1103/physrevb.86.04511210.1103/physrevb.86.045112 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.132967210.1063/1.1329672 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.132322410.1063/1.1323224 ↗
64. 10.1103/physrevb.86.17411010.1103/physrevb.86.174110 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.00410.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.004 ↗