journal article·2024-09-04Open access

Bioactivation of Konjac Glucomannan Films by Tannic Acid and Gluconolactone Addition

Beata Kaczmarek-Szczepańska, Lidia Zasada, Ugo D’Amora, Anna Pałubicka, Anna Michno, Anna Ronowska, Marcin Wekwejt

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 35

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Wound healing is a dynamic process that requires an optimal extracellular environment, as well as an accurate synchronization between various cell types. Over the past few years, great efforts have been devoted to developing novel approaches for treating and managing burn injuries, sepsis, and chronic or accidental skin injuries. Multifunctional smart-polymer-based dressings represent a promising approach to support natural healing and address several problems plaguing partially healed injuries, including severe inflammation, scarring, and wound infection. Naturally derived compounds offer unique advantages such as minimal toxicity, cost-effectiveness, and outstanding biocompatibility along with potential anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activity. Herein, the main driving idea of the work was the design and development of konjac glucomannan d -glucono-1,5-lactone (KG) films bioactivated by tannic acid and d -glucono-1,5-lactone (GL) addition. Our analysis, using attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared, atomic force microscopy, and surface energy measurements demonstrated that tannic acid (TA) clearly interacted with the KG matrix, acting as its cross-linker, whereas GL was embedded within the polymer structure. All developed films maintained a moist environment, which represents a pivotal property for wound dressing. Hemocompatibility experiments showed that all tested films exhibited no hemolytic impact on human erythrocytes. Moreover, the presence of TA and GL enhanced the metabolic and energetic activity in human dermal fibroblasts, as indicated by the MTT assay, showing results exceeding 150%. Finally, all films demonstrated high antibacterial properties as they significantly reduced the multiplication rate of both Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in bacterial broth and created the inhibition zones for S. aureus in agar plates. These remarkable outcomes make the KG/TA/GL film promising candidates for wound healing applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls · Natural product bioactivities and synthesis · Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomaterials and Cosmetics Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Gagarina 11, 87-100 Torun, Poland

Institute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council, v.le J.F. Kennedy 54, Mostra d’OLtremare Pad. 20, 80125 Naples, Italy

Department of Laboratory Diagnostics and Microbiology with Blood Bank, Specialist Hospital in Kościerzyna, Alojzego Piechowskiego 36, 83-400 Kościerzyna, Poland

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland

Department of Biomaterials Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-229 Gdańsk, Poland

Laboratory for Biomaterials and Bioengineering (CRC-Tier I), Dept Min-Met-Materials Eng & Regenerative Medicine, CHU de Quebec, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec G1 V 0A6, Canada

Funding

Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika w Toruniu · Politechnika Gdanska

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12900610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.129006 ↗
2. 10.1186/s12951-023-02202-910.1186/s12951-023-02202-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.21300010.1016/j.bioadv.2022.213000 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.16610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.166 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1510350710.3390/ma15103507 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20200645410.1002/adfm.202006454 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13569110.1016/j.cej.2022.135691 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cplett.2023.14082310.1016/j.cplett.2023.140823 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.01710.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.017 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1201009910.3390/polym12010099 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carres.2013.04.00610.1016/j.carres.2013.04.006 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.3c1926810.1021/acsami.3c19268 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.03310.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.033 ↗
14. 10.1039/D1BM01179K10.1039/D1BM01179K ↗
15. 10.1016/j.fbio.2020.10075110.1016/j.fbio.2020.100751 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11923510.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119235 ↗
17. 10.1002/adhm.20200112210.1002/adhm.202001122 ↗
18. 10.3390/ph1605065510.3390/ph16050655 ↗
19. 10.1111/srt.1304410.1111/srt.13044 ↗
20. 10.2147/CCID.S19373010.2147/CCID.S193730 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30060.x10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30060.x ↗
22. 10.3389/fphys.2022.85669910.3389/fphys.2022.856699 ↗
23. 10.1080/0737393070183130910.1080/07373930701831309 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11552710.1016/j.molliq.2021.115527 ↗
25. 2007
26. 10.3389/fbioe.2018.0009910.3389/fbioe.2018.00099 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00284-015-0801-210.1007/s00284-015-0801-2 ↗
28. 10.1088/1757-899X/546/4/04204510.1088/1757-899X/546/4/042045 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10391610.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103916 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1316263210.3390/polym13162632 ↗
31. 10.12336/biomatertransl.2021.02.00610.12336/biomatertransl.2021.02.006 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.04710.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.047 ↗
33. ISO 10993–5
34. 10.3390/polym1508185210.3390/polym15081852 ↗
35. 10.3390/foods1115236310.3390/foods11152363 ↗
36. 10.3892/ol.2020.1179010.3892/ol.2020.11790 ↗
37. 10.3390/antiox912130910.3390/antiox9121309 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15144010.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151440 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.10570210.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105702 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.008 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12158010.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121580 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.16810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.168 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11668910.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116689 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10856-018-6133-610.1007/s10856-018-6133-6 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11162110.1016/j.msec.2020.111621 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.07010.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.070 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.08310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.083 ↗
48. https://Www.Nveo.Org/Index.Php/Journal/Article/View/2379/2099.
49. 10.1007/s10570-014-0512-z10.1007/s10570-014-0512-z ↗
50. 10.1039/C3TB21640C10.1039/C3TB21640C ↗
51. 10.1016/j.engreg.2021.05.00210.1016/j.engreg.2021.05.002 ↗
52. 10.1002/pen.2557410.1002/pen.25574 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11237410.1016/j.msec.2021.112374 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.12226610.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122266 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12588810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125888 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.02910.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.029 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.10210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.102 ↗
58. Al-Hatim R. · Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils · 2021 · 8 · 11459
59. 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.11356110.1016/j.biopha.2022.113561 ↗
60. 10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00923-110.1016/S0378-5173(01)00923-1 ↗
61. 10.3390/ma1314322410.3390/ma13143224 ↗