Integration of Functional Groups to Enhance the Solubility and Stability of Viologen in Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
The chemical stability and energy density of redox couples are crucial factors in enhancing the durability and cost competitiveness of aqueous flow batteries. This study proposed integrating functional groups to viologen anolyte to increase its solubility and, consequently, energy density and stability for prolonged performance. Specifically, sulfonate and ester groups were selectively incorporated at the nitrogen sites of viologen to enhance solubility, leveraging their asymmetry and double hydrophilicity. Furthermore, an alpha-methyl group was introduced between the bipyridine and ester groups to enhance the chemical stability by preventing stacking and dimerization that can lead to irreversible degradation. The modified viologen demonstrated a remarkable solubility of 3.0 M in deionized water, corresponding to a volumetric capacity of 80.404 Ah L –1 . Additionally, the designed viologen exhibits outstanding retention of 92.4% after 200 cycles with a minimal capacity fading rate of 0.055% per cycle in a 0.1 M flow cell test.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Ionic liquids properties and applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Energy Storage Research Department, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Daejeon 34129, South Korea
Department of Energy and Materials Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, Seoul 04620, South Korea
Funding
Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr100290v10.1021/cr100290v ↗
2. 10.1126/science.121274110.1126/science.1212741 ↗
3. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.10210.1038/nenergy.2016.102 ↗
4. 10.1088/1755-1315/779/1/01202010.1088/1755-1315/779/1/012020 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.00510.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.01610.1016/j.joule.2022.02.016 ↗
7. 10.1002/cssc.20120073010.1002/cssc.201200730 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41560-023-01320-w10.1038/s41560-023-01320-w ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0065510.1021/acsenergylett.6b00655 ↗
10. 10.1039/C8RA00319J10.1039/C8RA00319J ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20160647210.1002/anie.201606472 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.04.02110.1016/j.chempr.2019.04.021 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20210257710.1002/aenm.202102577 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20200034010.1002/aenm.202000340 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20200825310.1002/anie.202008253 ↗
16. 10.1002/ente.20220104610.1002/ente.202201046 ↗
17. 10.1002/batt.20220035510.1002/batt.202200355 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.11.00110.1016/j.chempr.2017.11.001 ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20220208510.1002/aenm.202202085 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20200010010.1002/aenm.202000100 ↗
21. 10.1002/ange.20211001010.1002/ange.202110010 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0119810.1021/acsenergylett.2c01198 ↗
23. 10.1002/batt.20220042610.1002/batt.202200426 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22965910.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229659 ↗
25. 10.1002/ange.20221666210.1002/ange.202216662 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0079910.1021/acsaem.3c00799 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.10.01710.1016/j.ensm.2018.10.017 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12398510.1016/j.cej.2019.123985 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20160148810.1002/aenm.201601488 ↗
30. 10.1002/ange.20190793410.1002/ange.201907934 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.22610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.226 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.01.01910.1016/j.ensm.2021.01.019 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0001910.1021/acsenergylett.7b00019 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.01010.1016/j.joule.2018.10.010 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10589710.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105897 ↗
36. 10.1039/C8CC02336K10.1039/C8CC02336K ↗
37. 10.1002/cssc.20200038110.1002/cssc.202000381 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.46491310.1063/1.464913 ↗
40. 10.1080/0026897750010146110.1080/00268977500101461 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.47465910.1063/1.474659 ↗
42. Frisch, M. E.; Trucks, G.; Schlegel, H.; Scuseria, G.; Robb, M.; Cheeseman, J.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.; Nakatsuji, H. et al. Gaussian 16, revision C. 01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2016.
43. 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.13187610.1016/j.matlet.2022.131876 ↗
44. 10.1002/aenm.20150144910.1002/aenm.201501449 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0130210.1021/acsenergylett.7b01302 ↗
46. 10.1002/adfm.20210877710.1002/adfm.202108777 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41557-023-01291-110.1038/s41557-023-01291-1 ↗
48. 10.1002/aenm.20210347810.1002/aenm.202103478 ↗