Interfacial Affinity Determined Photocatalytic Activity: A Comparison between Defective and Bulk Polymeric Carbon Nitride
Source abstract
Abstract
The photoexcited charge separation efficiency of photocatalysts is generally considered as the key factor for enhancement of their photocatalytic activity, and sometimes, their photoabsorption capability and interfacial reaction kinetics play a key part, but the role of interfacial affinity of photocatalysts with substrates was rarely researched systematically. Herein, nitrogen vacancy-modified polymeric carbon nitride porous nanotubes (PCNpts) were simply synthesized, using tartaric acid as a crosslinking and corrosion agent, and exhibit a remarkable increment in surface area, wettability, photoabsorption and charge separation capability, and photocatalytic activity in water splitting to produce H 2, but, interestingly, exhibit substrate-dependent variation of photoactivity in contaminant degradation, compared with bulk PCN. More interestingly, the interfacial affinity of PCNpts and PCN with contaminants and H 2 O, rather than photoabsorption and charge separation capability, is confirmed to dominate their photoactivity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Covalent Organic Framework Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Engineering Research Center for Colloidal Materials, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250100, China
Stanley Fertilizer (Plain) Co., Ltd., Dezhou, Shandong 250100, China
Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250100, China
Funding
Shandong University · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10803210.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108032 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41570-022-00434-110.1038/s41570-022-00434-1 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.12.01110.1016/j.joule.2021.12.011 ↗
4. 10.1002/smll.20200336110.1002/smll.202003361 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(91)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(91) ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20220255910.1002/anie.202202559 ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.202355211810.1073/pnas.2023552118 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12072410.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120724 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41560-018-0194-010.1038/s41560-018-0194-0 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12182910.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121829 ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20230071710.1002/smll.202300717 ↗
12. 10.1093/nsr/nwac17110.1093/nsr/nwac171 ↗
13. 10.1021/ja053265s10.1021/ja053265s ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0041110.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00411 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20210107810.1002/aenm.202101078 ↗
16. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.3010.1038/natrevmats.2017.30 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat231710.1038/nmat2317 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0007510.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075 ↗
19. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0301510.1021/acscatal.9b03015 ↗
20. 10.1039/D0CS00445F10.1039/D0CS00445F ↗
21. 10.1073/pnas.191340311710.1073/pnas.1913403117 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.00310.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.03010.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.030 ↗
24. 10.1039/D0EN00985G10.1039/D0EN00985G ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12259310.1016/j.cej.2019.122593 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.watres.2021.11712510.1016/j.watres.2021.117125 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.11999310.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119993 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20180113910.1002/aenm.201801139 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0127110.1021/acsnano.8b01271 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0825110.1021/acsnano.6b08251 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12274-019-2357-010.1007/s12274-019-2357-0 ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20160166010.1002/smll.201601660 ↗
33. 10.1039/C9TA10688J10.1039/C9TA10688J ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14842710.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148427 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.10810.1016/j.cej.2018.09.108 ↗
36. 10.1039/c3ta14576j10.1039/c3ta14576j ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.7b1750310.1021/acsami.7b17503 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.11999510.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119995 ↗
39. 10.1021/jacs.9b0014410.1021/jacs.9b00144 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.06.01010.1016/j.chempr.2021.06.010 ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20210860510.1002/anie.202108605 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41560-021-00795-910.1038/s41560-021-00795-9 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.1c0568310.1021/acsami.1c05683 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10394210.1016/j.jece.2020.103942 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.05.00710.1016/j.apcatb.2019.05.007 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.est.2c0556010.1021/acs.est.2c05560 ↗
47. 10.1039/C3CY00940H10.1039/C3CY00940H ↗
48. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0684010.1021/acsnano.9b06840 ↗
49. 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63474-110.1016/S1872-2067(19)63474-1 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.17610.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.176 ↗
51. 10.1039/D1SC06555F10.1039/D1SC06555F ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12218010.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122180 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.14410.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.144 ↗
54. 10.1002/cctc.20180202110.1002/cctc.201802021 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11976610.1016/j.seppur.2021.119766 ↗
56. 10.1002/solr.20190041310.1002/solr.201900413 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0068610.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00686 ↗
58. 10.1021/jp400933810.1021/jp4009338 ↗
59. 10.1002/smll.20180183910.1002/smll.201801839 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.02404810.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.024048 ↗
61. 10.1126/science.aaa314510.1126/science.aaa3145 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.19531010.1103/PhysRevB.77.195310 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.15810.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.158 ↗
64. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0685110.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06851 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11779410.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117794 ↗
66. 10.1021/jp022105p10.1021/jp022105p ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12629710.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126297 ↗
68. 10.1021/je060134d10.1021/je060134d ↗
69. 10.1021/la00096a00110.1021/la00096a001 ↗
70. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0016110.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00161 ↗
71. 10.1007/s40843-022-2291-710.1007/s40843-022-2291-7 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12252010.1016/j.cej.2019.122520 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.04.01910.1016/j.apcatb.2014.04.019 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.01310.1016/j.watres.2017.05.013 ↗