journal article·2022-09-28

Precisely Tuning the Pore-Wall Surface Composition of Bioceramic Scaffolds Facilitates Angiogenesis and Orbital Bone Defect Repair

Yiyu Peng, Jingyi Wang, Xizhe Dai, Menglu Chen, Zhaonan Bao, Xianyan Yang, Jiajun Xie, Changjun Wang, Ji Shao, Haijie Han, Ke Yao, Zhongru Gou, Juan Ye

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 38
Publisher page

Abstract

Orbital bone damage (OBD) may result in severe post-traumatic enophthalmos, craniomaxillofacial deformities, vision loss, and intracranial infections. However, it is still a challenge to fabricate advanced biomaterials that can match the individual anatomical structure and enhance OBD repair in situ. Herein, we aimed to develop a selective surface modification strategy on bioceramic scaffolds and evaluated the effects of inorganic or organic functional coating on angiogenesis and osteogenesis, ectopically and orthotopically in OBD models. It was shown that the low thermal bioactive glass (BG) modification or layer-by-layer assembly of a biomimetic hydrogel (Biogel) could readily integrate into the pore wall of the bioceramic scaffolds. The BG and Biogel modification showed appreciable enhancement in the initial compressive strength (∼30–75%) or structural stability in vivo, respectively. BG modification could enhance by nearly 2-fold the vessel ingrowth, and the osteogenic capacity was also accelerated, accompanied with a mild scaffold biodegradation after 3 months. Meanwhile, the Biogel-modified scaffolds showed enhanced osteogenic differentiation and mineralization through calcium and phosphorus retention. The potential mechanism of the enhanced bone repair was elucidated via vascular and osteogenic cell responses in vitro, and the cell tests indicated that the Biogel and BG functional layers were both beneficial for in vitro osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization on bioceramics. Totally, these findings demonstrated that the bioactive ions or biomolecules could significantly improve the angiogenic and osteogenic capabilities of conventional bioceramics, and the integration of inorganic or organic functional coating in the pore wall is a highly flexible material toolbox that can be tailored directly to improve orbital bone defect repair.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Hemostasis and retained surgical items

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Eye Center, Zhejiang Provincial Key Lab of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China

Bio-nanomaterials and Regenerative Medicine Research Division, Zhejiang-California International Nanosystem Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China · Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province · Zhejiang Province

References (82)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/02713683.2020.171242310.1080/02713683.2020.1712423 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.0c0055310.1021/acsami.0c00553 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10561-016-9561-x10.1007/s10561-016-9561-x ↗
4. 10.1155/2019/265650310.1155/2019/2656503 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.5b0268510.1021/acsami.5b02685 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.09310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.093 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.01210.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.012 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.02610.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.026 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jot.2018.11.00610.1016/j.jot.2018.11.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.07.01610.1016/j.mattod.2018.07.016 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.00410.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.004 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.013 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.02810.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.028 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.01310.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.013 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cossms.2014.02.00410.1016/j.cossms.2014.02.004 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.2041-1294.2012.00095.x10.1111/j.2041-1294.2012.00095.x ↗
18. Eilbagi M. · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2016 · 68 · 60310.1016/j.msec.2016.06.030 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.07710.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.077 ↗
20. 10.2147/IJN.S16226210.2147/IJN.S162262 ↗
21. 10.1039/C7TB01931A10.1039/C7TB01931A ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.01210.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.012 ↗
23. 10.1039/C6TB00449K10.1039/C6TB00449K ↗
24. 10.1002/advs.20210014310.1002/advs.202100143 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10856-014-5346-610.1007/s10856-014-5346-6 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.1c0795010.1021/acsami.1c07950 ↗
27. 10.1002/jbm.a.3137110.1002/jbm.a.31371 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.07710.1016/j.msec.2017.08.077 ↗
29. 10.1039/C8TB00683K10.1039/C8TB00683K ↗
30. 10.1089/ten.2005.11.76810.1089/ten.2005.11.768 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20190434110.1002/adma.201904341 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.10742110.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107421 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20220075010.1002/adma.202200750 ↗
34. 10.1021/ar700082710.1021/ar7000827 ↗
35. 10.1021/ar200162j10.1021/ar200162j ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.0c0071410.1021/acsami.0c00714 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0004710.1021/acs.biomac.8b00047 ↗
38. 10.1186/s13036-020-00252-310.1186/s13036-020-00252-3 ↗
39. 10.1186/s40902-016-0072-210.1186/s40902-016-0072-2 ↗
40. 10.1002/mabi.20160000110.1002/mabi.201600001 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10088910.1016/j.apmt.2020.100889 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cis.2020.10228010.1016/j.cis.2020.102280 ↗
43. 10.3390/ijms1707113410.3390/ijms17071134 ↗
44. 10.1039/D0TB01948H10.1039/D0TB01948H ↗
45. 10.7150/thno.4010310.7150/thno.40103 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0081010.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00810 ↗
47. 10.1007/s12011-015-0338-z10.1007/s12011-015-0338-z ↗
48. 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.04310.1016/j.bone.2007.08.043 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2010.03.00310.1016/j.jtemb.2010.03.003 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.01210.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.012 ↗
51. 10.1021/am502537k10.1021/am502537k ↗
52. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.05410.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.054 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsami.8b2117910.1021/acsami.8b21179 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.00410.1016/j.joen.2019.03.004 ↗
55. 10.1080/1040839050046617410.1080/10408390500466174 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.01410.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.014 ↗
57. 10.2147/IJN.S25547710.2147/IJN.S255477 ↗
58. 10.1002/jbmr.347410.1002/jbmr.3474 ↗
59. 10.1111/jre.1260110.1111/jre.12601 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.06.04610.1016/j.matlet.2013.06.046 ↗
61. 10.1039/C6TB00735J10.1039/C6TB00735J ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.07.01810.1016/j.jtemb.2018.07.018 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.03810.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.038 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.03210.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.032 ↗
65. 10.1038/s41467-019-14076-310.1038/s41467-019-14076-3 ↗
66. 10.3390/cells802012110.3390/cells8020121 ↗
67. 10.3390/ijms2109324210.3390/ijms21093242 ↗
68. 10.1038/nature1314510.1038/nature13145 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.01510.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.015 ↗
70. 10.1039/C4CS00483C10.1039/C4CS00483C ↗
71. 10.3727/00000000578398323210.3727/000000005783983232 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.12.02810.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.12.028 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12098410.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120984 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.028 ↗
75. 10.1101/cshperspect.a00833410.1101/cshperspect.a008334 ↗
76. 10.1021/am502056q10.1021/am502056q ↗
77. 10.1021/acsami.0c1385110.1021/acsami.0c13851 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.10710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.107 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.01710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.017 ↗
80. 10.1002/adhm.20190138510.1002/adhm.201901385 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.01110.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.011 ↗
82. 10.1186/s13287-020-1562-910.1186/s13287-020-1562-9 ↗