journal article·2025-06-04

Physics-Assisted Machine Learning for the Simulation of the Slurry Drying in the Manufacturing Process of Battery Electrodes: A Hybrid Time-Dependent VGG16-DEM Model

Diego E. Galvez-Aranda, Francisco Fernandez, Alejandro A. Franco

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 17· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we present a hybrid Physics-Assisted Machine Learning (PAML) model that integrates Deep Learning (DL) techniques with the classical Discrete Element Method (DEM) to simulate slurry drying during a lithium-ion battery electrode manufacturing process. This model predicts the microstructure evolution leading to the formation of the electrode as a time-series along the drying process. The hybrid approach consists in performing a certain amount of DEM simulation steps, n DEM, after every DL prediction, mitigating the risk of unphysical predictions, like overlapping particles. Our PAML model was rigorously tested by evaluating different functional metrics of the predicted electrodes, including density, porosity, tortuosity factor, and radial distribution function. We conducted an in-depth analysis of performance versus accuracy, particularly focusing on the impact of the n DEM hyperparameter, which represents the number of DEM steps executed between two subsequent DL predictions. Despite the model being trained on a specific formulation (96% of Active Material, AM, and 4% of Carbon Binder Domain, CBD), it demonstrated exceptional generalization capability when used to extrapolate to a different formulation (94% AM and 6% CBD). This adaptability highlights the robustness of our PAML hybrid approach. Furthermore, the integration of DL significantly reduced the computational cost versus the original DEM model simulation, decreasing the calculation time from 615 to 36 min for the whole slurry drying simulation process. Our findings underscore the potential of combining ML with traditional simulation methods to enhance efficiency and accuracy in the field of electrode manufacturing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratoire de Réactivité et de Chimie des Solides (LRCS), UMR CNRS 7314, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Hub de l’Energie, 15 rue Baudelocque, 80039 Amiens Cedex, France

Réseau sur le Stockage Electrochimique de l’Energie (RS2E), FR CNRS 3459, Hub de l’Energie, 15 rue Baudelocque, 80039 Amiens Cedex, France

ALISTORE-European Research Institute, FR CNRS 3104, Hub de l’Energie, 15 rue Baudelocque, 80039 Amiens Cedex, France

Institut Universitaire de France, 1 rue Descartes, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Institut Universitaire de France · HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/batt.20220023910.1002/batt.202200239 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.00710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.007 ↗
3. 10.1149/2.1081802jes10.1149/2.1081802jes ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20210223310.1002/aenm.202102233 ↗
5. 10.1002/batt.20240011310.1002/batt.202400113 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.est.2019.10086210.1016/j.est.2019.100862 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.01510.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.015 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.018 ↗
9. 10.1002/admt.20170010610.1002/admt.201700106 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.19410.1016/j.procir.2022.05.194 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0023910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00239 ↗
12. 10.1002/batt.20240038510.1002/batt.202400385 ↗
13. 10.1002/batt.20200004910.1002/batt.202000049 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.10.03510.1016/j.ensm.2022.10.035 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.coelec.2022.10112710.1016/j.coelec.2022.101127 ↗
16. 10.1002/batt.20220011610.1002/batt.202200116 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0264710.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02647 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.egyai.2021.10009010.1016/j.egyai.2021.100090 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22910310.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229103 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23038410.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230384 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41524-022-00819-210.1038/s41524-022-00819-2 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0010810.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00108 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20240037610.1002/aenm.202400376 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.10292710.1016/j.ensm.2023.102927 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0372010.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03720 ↗
26. 10.1029/2019GL08529110.1029/2019GL085291 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.11051510.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110515 ↗
28. 10.1115/1.405585210.1115/1.4055852 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0555210.1021/acsomega.1c05552 ↗
30. 10.1109/TMTT.2023.323820810.1109/TMTT.2023.3238208 ↗
31. 10.1109/TGRS.2022.321324810.1109/TGRS.2022.3213248 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-023-36303-010.1038/s41598-023-36303-0 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23229410.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232294 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22728510.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227285 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22932010.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229320 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10374710.1016/j.ensm.2024.103747 ↗
37. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
38. Mascarenhas, S.; Agarwal, M. A comparison between VGG16, VGG19 and ResNet50 architecture frameworks for Image Classification. In 2021 International conference on disruptive technologies for multi-disciplinary research and applications (CENTCON) ; IEEE, 2021, pp 96–99.10.1109/CENTCON52345.2021.9687944 ↗
39. Math2Market GmbH, GeoDict simulation software Release 2024, (n.d.). doi.org/10.30423/release.geodict2024
40. 10.1002/aic.69002032010.1002/aic.690020320 ↗
41. 10.1002/andp.1935416080210.1002/andp.19354160802 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10388310.1016/j.ensm.2024.103883 ↗