journal article·2024-11-13Open access

Residual Ferromagnetic Regions Affecting the First-Order Phase Transition in Off-Stoichiometric Fe–Rh

Alex Aubert, Konstantin Skokov, Andrei Rogalev, Alisa Chirkova, Benedikt Beckmann, Fernando Maccari, Elvina Dilmieva, Fabrice Wilhelm, Vivian Nassif, Léopold V. B. Diop, Enrico Bruder, Julia Löfstrand, Daniel Primetzhofer, Martin Sahlberg, Esmaeil Adabifiroozjaei, Leopoldo Molina-Luna, Gabriel Gomez, Benedikt Eggert, Katharina Ollefs, Heiko Wende, Oliver Gutfleisch

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 45

Abstract

Among the magnetocaloric materials featuring first-order phase transitions (FOPT), FeRh is considered as a reference system to study the FOPT because it is a “simple” binary system with a CsCl structure exhibiting a large adiabatic temperature change. Recently, ab initio theory predicted that changes in the Fe/Rh stoichiometry in the vicinity of equiatomic composition strongly influence the FOPT characteristics. However, this theoretical prediction was not clearly verified experimentally. Here, we investigated the composition dependence of the transitional hysteresis in FeRh. It is shown that a Fe excess of only 1 at. % induces a ferromagnetic state in the whole temperature range (from 5 K up to T c ) for a minor portion of the sample (≈10%), while 5 at. % is enough to completely eliminate the FOPT. Element-specific X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) measurements suggest that this ferromagnetic contribution arises from residual FeRh ferromagnetic regions. We attribute the formation of such domains to Fe antisite defects, as Mössbauer spectroscopy demonstrates the presence of Fe atoms located at the 1b (Rh) sites in the CsCl-type structure. As a consequence, compared with the equiatomic composition, the slightly Fe-rich sample exhibits completely different FOPT properties, influencing the magnetocaloric performances. Thus, our study sheds light on the origin of the remarkable stoichiometric sensitivity of the FOPT behavior in FeRh. These insights have broader implications for understanding FOPT dynamics and the role of residual ferromagnetic domains.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic Properties of Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Functional Materials, Institute of Material Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany

European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 38000 Grenoble, France

CNRS, Institut Néel, University Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France

CNRS, IJL, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France

Physical Metallurgy, Institute of Material Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden

Department of Chemistry, Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden

Advanced Electron Microscopy Division, Institute of Material Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany

Faculty of Physics and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany

Funding

Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R1462510.1103/PhysRevB.62.R14625 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.10441610.1103/PhysRevB.67.104416 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.137583610.1063/1.1375836 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.17720310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.177203 ↗
5. 10.1038/415150a10.1038/415150a ↗
6. 10.1063/1.216280710.1063/1.2162807 ↗
7. 10.1016/0375-9601(90)90819-A10.1016/0375-9601(90)90819-A ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.1c2331310.1021/acsami.1c23313 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat333410.1038/nmat3334 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.10162410.1016/j.apmt.2022.101624 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.11869510.1016/j.actamat.2023.118695 ↗
12. 10.1088/2515-7655/accb0b10.1088/2515-7655/accb0b ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17461210.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174612 ↗
14. 10.1098/rsta.2015.030810.1098/rsta.2015.0308 ↗
15. 10.1051/anphys/19381110029110.1051/anphys/193811100291 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.0c0070410.1021/acsami.0c00704 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsaelm.3c0078910.1021/acsaelm.3c00789 ↗
18. 10.1088/0305-4608/4/9/01310.1088/0305-4608/4/9/013 ↗
19. 10.1002/pssb.222083020710.1002/pssb.2220830207 ↗
20. Makenin P. · 1988 · 3
21. 10.1063/1.170842410.1063/1.1708424 ↗
22. 10.1109/TMAG.2011.214036310.1109/TMAG.2011.2140363 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.482058310.1063/1.4820583 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.12.03510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.12.035 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.1c2246010.1021/acsami.1c22460 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.494935510.1063/1.4949355 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.00510.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.005 ↗
28. 10.3390/pr905077210.3390/pr9050772 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16613010.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166130 ↗
30. 10.1080/0141159041233131658210.1080/01411590412331316582 ↗
31. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/9/09600510.1088/0953-8984/24/9/096005 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.22442110.1103/PhysRevB.91.224421 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.05410.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.054 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.06441210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.064412 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.05442710.1103/PhysRevB.89.054427 ↗
36. 10.1116/6.000222010.1116/6.0002220 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.283244010.1063/1.2832440 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.295295610.1063/1.2952956 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41598-021-92760-510.1038/s41598-021-92760-5 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.2c2010710.1021/acsami.2c20107 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.tsf.2019.13741610.1016/j.tsf.2019.137416 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.03401410.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.034014 ↗
43. 10.1109/TIM.2022.315700110.1109/TIM.2022.3157001 ↗
44. 10.1134/S0031918X1513001310.1134/S0031918X15130013 ↗
45. 10.1080/08940886.2013.85038510.1080/08940886.2013.850385 ↗
46. du Tremolet de Lacheisserie E. · 200210.1007/978-0-387-23062-7 ↗
47. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.84013210.1109/TMAG.2004.840132 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16756010.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167560 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRev.131.18310.1103/PhysRev.131.183 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRev.134.A154710.1103/PhysRev.134.A1547 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.nimb.2006.12.03810.1016/j.nimb.2006.12.038 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.18440110.1103/PhysRevB.77.184401 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.19720410.1103/PhysRevLett.109.197204 ↗
54. Bertaut F. · Compt. Rend. · 1963 · 256 · 1688
55. 10.1063/1.172936210.1063/1.1729362 ↗
56. 10.1016/S0304-8853(97)00662-810.1016/S0304-8853(97)00662-8 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.11720110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.117201 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.11593910.1016/j.mseb.2022.115939 ↗
59. 10.1038/s41598-020-70899-x10.1038/s41598-020-70899-x ↗
60. 10.1039/D0RA01410A10.1039/D0RA01410A ↗
61. 10.1063/5.003213010.1063/5.0032130 ↗
62. 10.1088/2053-1591/ace4a310.1088/2053-1591/ace4a3 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0051110.1021/acsanm.2c00511 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.11957710.1016/j.actamat.2023.119577 ↗
65. 10.1143/JPSJ.29.119410.1143/JPSJ.29.1194 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.08720710.1103/PhysRevLett.110.087207 ↗
67. 10.2320/matertrans1989.36.73510.2320/matertrans1989.36.735 ↗
68. 10.1002/aenm.20190132210.1002/aenm.201901322 ↗
69. Institut Laue-Langevin 10.5291/ILL-DATA.5-31-2692.10.5291/ILL-DATA.5-31-2692 ↗