journal article·2024-10-09

Evaluation of Oxide|Sulfide Heteroionic Interface Stability for Developing Solid-State Batteries with a Lithium–Metal Electrode: The Case of LLZO|Li6PS5Cl and LLZO|Li7P3S11

Leonardo Merola, Vipin K. Singh, Max Palmer, Janis K. Eckhardt, Sebastian L. Benz, Till Fuchs, Linda F. Nazar, Jeff Sakamoto, Felix H. Richter, Jürgen Janek

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 40
Publisher page

Abstract

Developing solid-state batteries (SSB) with a lithium metal electrode (LME) using only one type of solid electrolyte (SE) is a significant challenge since no SE fits all the requirements imposed by both electrodes. A possible solution is using multilayer SSBs with an LME where the drawbacks of each SE are overcome by using layers of different SEs. However, research on inorganic SE 1 |SE 2 heteroionic interfaces is still quite preliminary, especially regarding oxide|sulfide heteroionic interfaces. This work reports the electrochemical investigation of the heteroionic interface between Li 6.25 Al 0.25 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (Al-LLZO) and two representative materials for sulfide-based SEs: argyrodite-based Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSCl) and glass-like Li 7 P 3 S 11 (LPS711). Through in-depth temperature- and pressure-dependent impedance analyses of multilayer symmetric cells at equilibrium (i.e., no current load), the electrical properties of the heteroionic interfaces are assessed. The pressure-dependent kinetic of the Al-LLZO|LPSCl pair is interpreted with the concept of geometric constriction resistance and show that its resistance is lower than for the Al-LLZO|LPS711 pair. Furthermore, the effect of Al-LLZO surface treatment on the electrical properties of the Al-LLZO|LPSCl heteroionic interface is evaluated. Such investigation shows that the value of the interface activation energy decreases when the Al-LLZO surface is heat treated, revealing a significant influence of the carbonate/hydroxide passivation layer on the heteroionic interface. Additionally, by cycling the symmetric cell for 900 h at 1.0 mAh·cm –2, it is revealed that the Al-LLZO|LPSCl interface has a lower impedance increase than the Al-LLZO|LPS711 interface, especially if the Al-LLZO is heat treated. With this work, we highlight that the oxide|argyrodite combination can be a promising candidate for multilayer SSBs with an LME. However, we show that an optimized LLZO surface treatment and chemical analysis of the interface are recommended for future research.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Physical Chemistry and Center for Materials Research (ZfM), Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 17, Giessen D-35392, Germany

Department of Chemistry and Waterloo Institute of Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada

Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States

Materials Department & Department of Mechanical Engineering, 1355 University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-5050, United States

Funding

Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung · National Energy Technology Laboratory · Hessisches Ministerium f?r Wissenschaft und Kunst · Ontario Research Fund

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-020-0565-110.1038/s41560-020-0565-1 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.00710.1016/j.joule.2022.02.007 ↗
4. 10.5796/electrochemistry.84.21010.5796/electrochemistry.84.210 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.01210.1016/j.joule.2020.03.012 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmat.2016.04.00310.1016/j.jmat.2016.04.003 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20220193910.1002/aenm.202201939 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20200268910.1002/aenm.202002689 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matt.2023.04.02210.1016/j.matt.2023.04.022 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.8b0670510.1021/acsami.8b06705 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0053310.1021/acsaem.2c00533 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41560-023-01208-910.1038/s41560-023-01208-9 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.9b2278810.1021/acsami.9b22788 ↗
14. 10.1039/D2TA03676B10.1039/D2TA03676B ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.13110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.131 ↗
16. 10.1002/advs.20230398510.1002/advs.202303985 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20221322810.1002/anie.202213228 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20181422210.1002/anie.201814222 ↗
19. 10.1007/s41918-020-00062-710.1007/s41918-020-00062-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22859810.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228598 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15163810.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151638 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.10.00110.1016/j.joule.2019.10.001 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.8b1923710.1021/acsami.8b19237 ↗
24. 10.1149/1945-7111/aca12510.1149/1945-7111/aca125 ↗
25. 10.1149/2.0381712jes10.1149/2.0381712jes ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.05.02010.1016/j.ensm.2021.05.020 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.4c0180810.1021/acsami.4c01808 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.9b0253710.1021/acsami.9b02537 ↗
29. 10.1039/C3EE41655K10.1039/C3EE41655K ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.11510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.115 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.10104310.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101043 ↗
32. 10.1039/C9TA12889A10.1039/C9TA12889A ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ssi.2015.11.03410.1016/j.ssi.2015.11.034 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.1990002030410.1002/adma.19900020304 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.3c1006010.1021/acsami.3c10060 ↗
36. 10.1002/admi.20220235410.1002/admi.202202354 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.2c1299110.1021/acsami.2c12991 ↗
38. Slade P. G. · 2014
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23067210.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230672 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2019.10001210.1016/j.xcrp.2019.100012 ↗
41. 10.1002/aenm.20160201110.1002/aenm.201602011 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0382910.1021/acsaem.1c03829 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0248110.1021/acsaem.1c02481 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.8b1835610.1021/acsami.8b18356 ↗
45. 10.1021/jacs.8b0310610.1021/jacs.8b03106 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0045910.1021/acsaem.3c00459 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0300210.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03002 ↗
48. 10.1002/batt.20180014910.1002/batt.201800149 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0227410.1021/acsenergylett.3c02274 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41467-021-27311-710.1038/s41467-021-27311-7 ↗
51. 10.1149/1945-7111/abf8d710.1149/1945-7111/abf8d7 ↗
52. 10.1002/batt.20210001510.1002/batt.202100015 ↗
53. 10.1002/aenm.20220367310.1002/aenm.202203673 ↗
54. 10.1039/D1TA09846B10.1039/D1TA09846B ↗
55. 10.1021/acsami.2c2130210.1021/acsami.2c21302 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z ↗
57. 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00628-710.1016/S0167-2738(00)00628-7 ↗
58. 10.1002/978352761553710.1002/9783527615537 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.01710.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.017 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0043110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00431 ↗
61. 10.1002/anie.20240943510.1002/anie.202409435 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0091510.1021/acsenergylett.4c00915 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.matt.2021.04.01610.1016/j.matt.2021.04.016 ↗
64. 10.1002/aenm.20230031010.1002/aenm.202300310 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.09710.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.097 ↗