Nanosheets of a Layered Metal–Organic Framework for Separation of CO2/CH4 using Mixed Matrix Membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Mixed matrix membranes represent an important technology for gas separations. Nanosheets of metal–organic framework (MOF) materials of high aspect ratio and size-selective gas transport properties have the potential to promote the efficient mixing of components to form membranes for gas separation. Herein, we report a bottom-up synthesis of extended sheets of kagomé (kgm) topology, kgm t -Bu, via the linkage of [Cu 2 (O 2 CR) 4 ] paddlewheels with 5- tert -butylisophthalic acid. The growth of the layered structure can be controlled by the choice of solvent and modulator. Nanosheets of kgm t -Bu of average thickness of 20 nm and aspect ratio of 40 to 50 can be obtained, and the sieving effect of the channels in kgm t -Bu boost the efficient separation of CO 2 over CH 4 . A mixed matrix membrane comprising kgm t -Bu nanosheets with Matrimid shows a 32% enhancement in CO 2 /CH 4 selectivity compared with the membrane incorporating the MOF in the particulate form.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Covalent Organic Framework Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.
College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 71 Avenue des Martyrs CS40220 Grenoble Cedex 9 38043, France
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · H2020 European Research Council
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.08410.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.084 ↗
2. Ismail A. F. · 201510.1007/978-3-319-01095-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-J10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-J ↗
4. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.03010.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20170110910.1002/anie.201701109 ↗
6. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.7810.1038/natrevmats.2016.78 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.008 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.39010.1016/j.desal.2006.03.390 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.01710.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.017 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20180240110.1002/adma.201802401 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.9b0253910.1021/acsami.9b02539 ↗
12. 10.1021/cr200304e10.1021/cr200304e ↗
13. 10.1021/cr200179u10.1021/cr200179u ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat411310.1038/nmat4113 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20170723410.1002/adma.201707234 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.00210.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.002 ↗
17. 10.1039/C6CC05154E10.1039/C6CC05154E ↗
18. 10.1126/science.125422710.1126/science.1254227 ↗
19. 10.1021/ja203799610.1021/ja2037996 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja312567v10.1021/ja312567v ↗
21. 10.1039/C5TA03739E10.1039/C5TA03739E ↗
22. 10.1126/science.abe019210.1126/science.abe0192 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.01110.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.011 ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.8b0998710.1021/jacs.8b09987 ↗
25. 10.1021/cg070144q10.1021/cg070144q ↗
26. 10.1002/ntls.1002010.1002/ntls.10020 ↗
27. Rodriguez-Carvajal J. · 1990 · 127
28. 10.1039/c2jm15675j10.1039/c2jm15675j ↗
29. 10.1126/science.123145110.1126/science.1231451 ↗
30. 10.1039/b802426j10.1039/b802426j ↗
31. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12076810.1016/j.memsci.2022.120768 ↗