journal article·2024-06-12

Nanoscale Adhesion and Material Transfer at 2D MoS2–MoS2 Interfaces Elucidated by In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy and Atomistic Simulations

Sathwik Reddy Toom, Takaaki Sato, Zachary Milne, Rodrigo A. Bernal, Yeau-Ren Jeng, Christopher Muratore, Nicholas R. Glavin, Robert W. Carpick, J. David Schall

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

Low-dimensional materials, such as MoS 2, hold promise for use in a host of emerging applications, including flexible, wearable sensors due to their unique electrical, thermal, optical, mechanical, and tribological properties. The implementation of such devices requires an understanding of adhesive phenomena at the interfaces between these materials. Here, we describe combined nanoscale in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM)/atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments and simulations measuring the work of adhesion ( W adh ) between self-mated contacts of ultrathin nominally amorphous and nanocrystalline MoS 2 films deposited on Si scanning probe tips. A customized TEM/AFM nanoindenter permitted high-resolution imaging and force measurements in situ . The W adh values for nanocrystalline and nominally amorphous MoS 2 were 604 ± 323 mJ/m 2 and 932 ± 647 mJ/m 2, respectively, significantly higher than previously reported values for mechanically exfoliated MoS 2 single crystals. Closely matched molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show that these high values can be explained by bonding between the opposing surfaces at defects such as grain boundaries. Simulations show that as grain size decreases, the number of bonds formed, the W adh and its variability all increase, further supporting that interfacial covalent bond formation causes high adhesion. In some cases, sliding between delaminated MoS 2 flakes during separation is observed, which further increases the W adh and the range of adhesive interaction. These results indicate that for low adhesion, the MoS 2 grains should be large relative to the contact area to limit the opportunity for bonding, whereas small grains may be beneficial, where high adhesion is needed to prevent device delamination in flexible systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Graphene research and applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, North Carolina 27411, United States

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States

Gatan, Inc., Pleasanton, California 94588, United States

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas, Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States

Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University in Tainan, Tainan 70101, Taiwan

Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio 45469, United States

Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, US Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · Air Force Office of Scientific Research · Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation · Division of Materials Research

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11432-018-9442-310.1007/s11432-018-9442-3 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10853-015-9643-310.1007/s10853-015-9643-3 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20180824710.1002/adfm.201808247 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20210586510.1002/adma.202105865 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat106110.1038/nmat1061 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20100442610.1002/adma.201004426 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.2c0001710.1021/acsnanoscienceau.2c00017 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aac943910.1126/science.aac9439 ↗
9. 10.1038/nnano.2010.27910.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
10. 10.1039/c3nr03220e10.1039/c3nr03220e ↗
11. 10.1002/ls.301012020610.1002/ls.3010120206 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12650910.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126509 ↗
13. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.305403810.1109/JSEN.2021.3054038 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00216-014-8267-910.1007/s00216-014-8267-9 ↗
15. 10.1021/nn400280c10.1021/nn400280c ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20190430210.1002/adma.201904302 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20170183810.1002/adma.201701838 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.physleta.2012.02.02910.1016/j.physleta.2012.02.029 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0365210.1021/acsnano.9b03652 ↗
20. Israelachvili J. N. · 2011
21. 10.1016/0257-8972(90)90009-210.1016/0257-8972(90)90009-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/0040-6090(90)90285-L10.1016/0040-6090(90)90285-L ↗
23. 10.1016/S0167-8922(08)70248-710.1016/S0167-8922(08)70248-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.06810.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.068 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-020-19411-710.1038/s41467-020-19411-7 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0173510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01735 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.6b1617510.1021/acsami.6b16175 ↗
28. 10.1038/ncomms463110.1038/ncomms4631 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0682810.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06828 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.539210.1103/PhysRevB.14.5392 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.838310.1103/PhysRevB.60.8383 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.23550210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.235502 ↗
33. 10.1088/2053-1583/aa967410.1088/2053-1583/aa9674 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.03610.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.036 ↗
35. 10.1557/jmr.2016.3610.1557/jmr.2016.36 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.3.428610.1103/PhysRevB.3.4286 ↗
37. 10.1016/0043-1648(67)90187-110.1016/0043-1648(67)90187-1 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11249-015-0539-910.1007/s11249-015-0539-9 ↗
39. Https://Github.Com/Sathwikreddytoom/In-Situ-Experimental-and-Simulation-Study-of-Adhesion-and-Material-Transfer-between-2D-MoS-2-Films.
40. Kittel C. · 2005
41. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11249010.1016/j.matdes.2023.112490 ↗
42. 10.1557/jmr.2007.032910.1557/jmr.2007.0329 ↗
43. 10.1016/0021-9797(92)90285-T10.1016/0021-9797(92)90285-T ↗
44. 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-110.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1 ↗
45. 10.1088/0965-0393/21/4/04500310.1088/0965-0393/21/4/045003 ↗
46. 10.1021/nn501896e10.1021/nn501896e ↗
47. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.04010.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.040 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.9b0869510.1021/acsami.9b08695 ↗
49. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.505010.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5050 ↗
51. 10.1080/0892702000804411310.1080/08927020008044113 ↗
52. 10.1021/nn506052d10.1021/nn506052d ↗
53. 10.1002/admi.20210083810.1002/admi.202100838 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.05.01410.1016/j.jmps.2014.05.014 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.01.19010.1016/j.tsf.2009.01.190 ↗
56. Muratore C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 26160410.1063/1.4885391 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0202910.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02029 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.115002110.1063/1.1150021 ↗
59. 10.1051/m2an/196903R10035110.1051/m2an/196903R100351 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.44811810.1063/1.448118 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1634910.1103/PhysRevB.49.16349 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.24511010.1103/PhysRevB.79.245110 ↗
64. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/4/31210.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312 ↗
65. 10.1098/rspa.1924.008110.1098/rspa.1924.0081 ↗
66. 10.1098/rspa.1924.008210.1098/rspa.1924.0082 ↗
67. 10.1063/1.491653810.1063/1.4916538 ↗
68. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
69. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.805210.1103/PhysRevB.45.8052 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.00910.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.009 ↗