journal article·2024-05-22

Incorporation of Inclusion Complexes in the Dissolvable Microneedle Ocular Patch System for the Efficiency of Fluconazole in the Therapy of Fungal Keratitis

Ulfah Mahfufah, Muhammad Alif Sya’ban Mahfud, Mesakh Diki Saputra, Sumayya Binti Abd Azis, Azimah Salsabila, Rangga Meidianto Asri, Habibie Habibie, Yessie Sari, Risfah Yulianty, Ahmad R. Alsayed, Boonnada Pamornpathomkul, Maria Mir, Andi Dian Permana

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Fluconazole (FNL) is one of the first-line treatments for fungal keratitis as it is an effective broad-spectrum antimicrobial commonly administered orally or topically. However, FNL has a very low water solubility, limiting its drug formulation, therapeutic application, and bioavailability through tissues. To overcome these limitations, this study aimed to develop FNL inclusion complexes (FNL-IC) with cyclodextrin (α-cyclodextrin, sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin, and hydroxypropyl-γ cyclodextrin) and incorporate it into a dissolvable microneedle (DMN) system to improve solubility and drug penetration. FNL-IC was evaluated for saturation solubility, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, in vitro release, minimum inhibitory concentration, minimum fungicidal concentration, and time-killing assay. DMN-FNL-IC was evaluated for mechanical and insertion properties, surface pH, moisture absorption ability, water vapor transmission, and drug content recovery. Moreover, ocular kinetic, ex vivo antimicrobial, in vivo antifungal, and chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) assays were conducted to assess the overall performance of the formulation. Mechanical strength and insertion properties revealed that DMN-FNL-IC has great mechanical and insertion properties. The in vitro release of FNL-IC was significantly improved, exhibiting a 9-fold increase compared to pure FNL. The ex vivo antifungal activity showed significant inhibition of Candida albicans from 6.54 to 0.73 log cfu/mL or 100–0.94%. In vivo numbers of colonies of 0.87 ± 0.13 log cfu/mL (F2), 4.76 ± 0.26 log cfu/mL (FNL eye drops), 3.89 ± 0.24 log cfu/mL (FNL ointments), and 8.04 ± 0.58 log cfu/mL (control) showed the effectiveness of DMN preparations against other standard commercial preparations. The HET-CAM assay showed that DMN-FNL-IC (F2) did not show any vascular damage. Finally, a combination of FNL-IC and DMN was developed appropriately for ocular delivery of FNL, which was safe and increased the effectiveness of treatments for fungal keratitis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Ocular Surface and Contact Lens

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Pharmacy, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia

Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, Applied Science Private University, Amman 11931, Jordan

Faculty of Pharmacy, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom 73000, Thailand

Department of Pharmacy, Iqra University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan

Funding

Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/jof304005710.3390/jof3040057 ↗
2. 10.3126/nje.v7i2.1797510.3126/nje.v7i2.17975 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12348-011-0019-910.1007/s12348-011-0019-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.10068110.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100681 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30448-510.1016/S1473-3099(20)30448-5 ↗
6. 10.1080/09286586.2019.170053310.1080/09286586.2019.1700533 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.10380210.1016/j.micpath.2019.103802 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ajps.2019.09.00310.1016/j.ajps.2019.09.003 ↗
9. 10.1080/1040841X.2021.188464110.1080/1040841X.2021.1884641 ↗
10. 10.1515/jbcpp-2021-000810.1515/jbcpp-2021-0008 ↗
11. 10.2217/17460913.3.6.60310.2217/17460913.3.6.603 ↗
12. 10.1038/nrd157610.1038/nrd1576 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.11939510.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119395 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10847-008-9501-x10.1007/s10847-008-9501-x ↗
15. 10.3762/BJOC.10.30810.3762/BJOC.10.308 ↗
16. 10.3390/molecules2714442510.3390/molecules27144425 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.02.05910.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.02.059 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-018-06981-w10.1038/s41467-018-06981-w ↗
19. 10.2174/187221131466619122411521110.2174/1872211314666191224115211 ↗
20. 10.1124/jpet.119.25693310.1124/jpet.119.256933 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.03910.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.039 ↗
22. 10.1007/s13346-017-0470-810.1007/s13346-017-0470-8 ↗
23. 10.1002/smll.20210465710.1002/smll.202104657 ↗
24. 10.1080/03639045.2020.177631710.1080/03639045.2020.1776317 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.11880810.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118808 ↗
26. 10.1007/s13346-021-01032-210.1007/s13346-021-01032-2 ↗
27. 10.3390/su1415951310.3390/su14159513 ↗
28. 10.1111/1750-3841.1392310.1111/1750-3841.13923 ↗
29. 10.5530/ijper.50.2.2410.5530/ijper.50.2.24 ↗
30. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1111060510.3390/pharmaceutics11110605 ↗
31. 10.15171/apb.2017.05010.15171/apb.2017.050 ↗
32. 10.18466/cbayarfbe.61395110.18466/cbayarfbe.613951 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.10252210.1016/j.jddst.2021.102522 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.06.02510.1016/j.ejpb.2020.06.025 ↗
35. CLSI · 2012
36. 10.4103/2277-9175.18739410.4103/2277-9175.187394 ↗
37. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.0102110.3389/fmicb.2019.01021 ↗
38. 10.1155/2018/704049810.1155/2018/7040498 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c0093610.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00936 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.00410.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.004 ↗
41. 10.1007/s13346-021-01032-210.1007/s13346-021-01032-2 ↗
42. 10.1080/10717544.2022.212092610.1080/10717544.2022.2120926 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.12120410.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121204 ↗
44. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1408172310.3390/pharmaceutics14081723 ↗
45. 10.1590/S1984-8250200900040001210.1590/S1984-82502009000400012 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.1c1117910.1021/acsami.1c11179 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.12062310.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120623 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.10461410.1016/j.jddst.2023.104614 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.12.00310.1016/j.ejpb.2020.12.003 ↗
50. 10.37358/rc.19.8.741810.37358/rc.19.8.7418 ↗
51. Khalid S. H. · 2019 · 11 · 13
52. 10.1007/s10847-016-0598-z10.1007/s10847-016-0598-z ↗
53. 10.3390/molecules2305116110.3390/molecules23051161 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.13246710.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132467 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.02210.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.022 ↗
56. 10.1007/s10847-010-9908-z10.1007/s10847-010-9908-z ↗
57. 10.1208/s12249-011-9690-210.1208/s12249-011-9690-2 ↗
58. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.026482510.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0264825 ↗
59. 10.3390/scipharm8903003310.3390/scipharm89030033 ↗
60. Septya, E. N.; Amelia, R.; Suharyani, I. View of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) Extract of NADES Nail Henna Leaves Against Bacillus Cereus Bacteria; Journal of Health Science and Policy. https://journals.eduped.org/index.php/jhsp/article/view/168/164 (accessed Dec 05, 2023).
61. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.11.01010.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.11.010 ↗
62. 10.1007/S40123-021-00365-Y10.1007/S40123-021-00365-Y ↗
63. 10.3390/ph1603037810.3390/ph16030378 ↗
64. 10.1186/s40543-016-0105-610.1186/s40543-016-0105-6 ↗
65. 10.2116/analsci.31.108310.2116/analsci.31.1083 ↗
66. International Council for Harmonisation, I · 2005
67. 10.3390/PHARMACEUTICS1509234510.3390/PHARMACEUTICS15092345 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.11690710.1016/j.lfs.2019.116907 ↗
69. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1403047210.3390/pharmaceutics14030472 ↗
70. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1311186510.3390/pharmaceutics13111865 ↗
71. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0006610.3389/fbioe.2019.00066 ↗
72. 10.1007/s13346-022-01190-x10.1007/s13346-022-01190-x ↗
73. Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVMA) · 2010
74. 10.1002/smll.20210465710.1002/smll.202104657 ↗
75. 10.3762/bjnano.13.9810.3762/bjnano.13.98 ↗
76. 10.1038/s41573-023-00670-010.1038/s41573-023-00670-0 ↗