journal article·2023-11-22

Incorporating Loss Factor Modular Design for Full Ku-Band Microwave Attenuation in Double-Layered Graphene Aerogels

Mehran Ashouri-Sanjani, Meysam Salari, Reza Rahmati, Mahdi Hamidinejad, Chul B. Park

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 46
Publisher page

Abstract

The fabrication of absorption-dominant electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials is a pressing priority to prevent secondary electromagnetic pollution in miniaturized electronic devices and communication systems. Meeting this goal has remained a tough challenge to keep pace with the rapid evolution of electronics due to the complex compositional and structural design and narrow operating bands. This work articulates a sound and simple strategy to precisely modulate the electrical conductivity of reduced graphene oxide (rGO), as the building block in lightweight double-layered rGO-film/rGO-aerogel/polyvinyl-alcohol (PVA) composites, for efficient microwave absorption over the entire Ku-band frequency range. These constructs reasonably comprised a porous absorption structure built from parallel rGO sheets aligned and prepared via freeze casting followed by freeze drying. The electrical conductivity and impedance of this layer were tuned by varying the annealing temperature from 400 to 800 °C, thereby adjusting the degree of reduction and the absorption characteristic. This layer was backed by a highly conductive rGO film reduced at a high temperature of 1000 °C, with a reflectivity of 97.5%. The incorporation of this film ensured high EMI shielding effectiveness of the double-layered structure through the absorption–reflection–reabsorption mechanism, consistent with the predicted values based on calculated loss factors and the input impedance of the structure. Accordingly, at an average EMI shielding effectiveness of 57.59 dB, the reflection shielding effectiveness (SE R ) and reflectivity ( R ) of the assembled composites were optimized to be as low as 0.22 dB and 0.049, respectively. This equates to approximately 99.999% shielding (SE T ) and ∼95% absorptivity ( A ) of the incident wave. This study opens new avenues for the development of lightweight (with a density as low as 15 mg/cm 3 ) absorption-dominant EMI shielding composite materials with promising EMI shielding efficiency and potential applications in modern electronics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King’s College Road, Toronto M5S 3G8, Canada

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2H5, Canada

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/IGARSS.2009.541772410.1109/IGARSS.2009.5417724 ↗
2. 10.1080/15368378.2019.168554010.1080/15368378.2019.1685540 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jare.2016.04.00410.1016/j.jare.2016.04.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.10944510.1016/j.envres.2020.109445 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.04710.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.047 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.3c0798810.1021/acsami.3c07988 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.02710.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.027 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.9b1976810.1021/acsami.9b19768 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10979910.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109799 ↗
10. 10.1039/D3TA01369C10.1039/D3TA01369C ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11009710.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110097 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.2c2244710.1021/acsami.2c22447 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.10.09010.1016/j.carbon.2022.10.090 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.10510.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.105 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.02.06110.1016/j.carbon.2023.02.061 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10941910.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109419 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.29910.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.299 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10981910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109819 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10577310.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105773 ↗
20. 10.1021/ACSAMI.2C0312110.1021/ACSAMI.2C03121 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.9b2305210.1021/acsami.9b23052 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.7b0698210.1021/acsami.7b06982 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.01.03210.1016/j.carbon.2023.01.032 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.3c0024910.1021/acsami.3c00249 ↗
25. 10.1021/nn100636810.1021/nn1006368 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20190715610.1002/adma.201907156 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mseb.2014.11.00210.1016/j.mseb.2014.11.002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13133710.1016/j.cej.2021.131337 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10704910.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107049 ↗
30. 10.1002/mame.20210003210.1002/mame.202100032 ↗
31. 10.1002/advs.20230236110.1002/advs.202302361 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.01910.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.019 ↗
33. 10.1002/smll.20200340710.1002/smll.202003407 ↗
34. 10.1039/D0NR03104F10.1039/D0NR03104F ↗
35. 10.1021/ACSNANO.9B07452/SUPPL_FILE/NN9B07452_SI_004.AVI10.1021/ACSNANO.9B07452/SUPPL_FILE/NN9B07452_SI_004.AVI ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.8b1074510.1021/acsami.8b10745 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12366610.1016/j.cej.2019.123666 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.13110.1016/j.cej.2017.12.131 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.8b1365810.1021/acsami.8b13658 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20190717610.1002/adma.201907176 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matt.2019.08.01310.1016/j.matt.2019.08.013 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0181510.1021/acsnano.7b01815 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.05110.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.051 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.8b0512910.1021/acsami.8b05129 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10569210.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105692 ↗
46. 10.1002/pat.557110.1002/pat.5571 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12269610.1016/j.cej.2019.122696 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.elspec.2014.07.00310.1016/j.elspec.2014.07.003 ↗
49. 10.1126/sciadv.150084910.1126/sciadv.1500849 ↗
50. 10.1002/adma.20190741110.1002/adma.201907411 ↗
51. 10.1109/IMOC.2011.616929310.1109/IMOC.2011.6169293 ↗
52. 10.1039/D1TA00417D10.1039/D1TA00417D ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0320610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03206 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.11.01110.1016/j.jmrt.2018.11.011 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsami.7b0493510.1021/acsami.7b04935 ↗
56. 10.1039/C8TC03714K10.1039/C8TC03714K ↗
57. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.10.00810.1016/j.mattod.2017.10.008 ↗
58. 10.1039/C7NR02943H10.1039/C7NR02943H ↗
59. 10.1063/1.3555436/93612710.1063/1.3555436/936127 ↗
60. 10.1017/S175907871800147210.1017/S1759078718001472 ↗
61. 10.1002/smtd.20210151010.1002/smtd.202101510 ↗
62. 10.1039/D1MH01346G10.1039/D1MH01346G ↗
63. 10.1109/22.50866210.1109/22.508662 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.10094010.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100940 ↗
65. 10.1007/s40820-021-00759-410.1007/s40820-021-00759-4 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.10120410.1016/j.nantod.2021.101204 ↗
67. 10.1063/5.007501910.1063/5.0075019 ↗
68. Baker-Jarvis, J. R.; Janezic, M. D.; Riddle, B. F.; Johnk, R. T.; Holloway, C. L.; Geyer, R. G.; Grosvenor, C. A. Measuring the Permittivity and Permeability of Lossy Materials: Solids, Liquids, Metals, and Negative-Index Materials; 2005.
69. 10.1109/22.55203210.1109/22.552032 ↗
70. 10.1002/adfm.20221237910.1002/adfm.202212379 ↗
71. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0045410.1021/acsomega.9b00454 ↗
72. 10.1021/acsami.0c0568810.1021/acsami.0c05688 ↗
73. 10.1039/D1MH01346G10.1039/D1MH01346G ↗
74. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.05.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.05.025 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10917510.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109175 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10664810.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106648 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11930610.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119306 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.12.02810.1016/j.carbon.2020.12.028 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.07910.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.079 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13866710.1016/j.cej.2022.138667 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.07.01610.1016/j.carbon.2022.07.016 ↗
82. 10.1021/ACSAMI.5B11715/SUPPL_FILE/AM5B11715_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSAMI.5B11715/SUPPL_FILE/AM5B11715_SI_001.PDF ↗
83. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10041610.1016/j.coco.2020.100416 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.05410.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.054 ↗