Fluorinated High-Voltage Electrolytes To Stabilize Nickel-Rich Lithium Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
As state-of-the-art (SOA) lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries approach their specific energy limit (∼250 Wh kg –1 ), layer-structured, nickel-rich (Ni-rich) lithium transition metal oxide-based cathode materials, e.g., LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811), have attracted great interest owing to their practical high specific capacities (>200 mAhg –1 ). Coupled with their high average discharge voltages (∼4 V vs Li/Li + ), Ni-rich cathode-based lithium batteries possess a great potential to achieve much higher specific energies (>350 Wh kg –1 at the cell level) than the SOA Li-ion counterparts. In addition, Ni-rich oxides are low-cost battery cathode materials due to their low cobalt contents. However, Ni-rich cathode-based lithium batteries suffer quick capacity degradations upon cycling, particularly at high upper cutoff voltages (e.g., ≥4.5 V vs Li/Li + ), due to crystal structure changes of the active cathode materials and parasitic side reactions at the electrolyte/electrode interfaces. In this study, a fluorinated-solvent-based, high-voltage stable electrolyte (HVE), i.e., 1 M Li bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) carbonate (FDEC), and methyl (2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) carbonate (FEMC) with Li difluoro(oxalate)borate (LiDFOB) additive, was formulated and evaluated in Li/NMC811 battery cells. To the best of our knowledge, this class of electrolyte has not been investigated for Ni-rich cathode-based lithium batteries. Li/NMC811 cells with HVE exhibited a superior long-term cycle performance stability, maintaining ∼80% capacity after ∼500 cycles at a high cutoff voltage of 4.5 V (vs Li/Li + ) than a baseline carbonate-solvent-based electrolyte (BE). The superior cycle stability of the Li/NMC811 cells is attributed to the inherently high-voltage stability of HVE, supported by the physical and electrochemical analyses. This conclusion is supported by our density functional theory (DFT) modeling where HVE shows a less tendency of deprotonation/oxidation than BE, leading to the observed cycle stability. The findings in this study are important to help tackle the technical challenges facing Ni-rich cathode-based lithium batteries to realize their high energy density potentials with a long cycle life.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, United States
Department of Physics, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, United States
Lynntech Inc., College Station, Texas 77845, United States
Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States
Funding
Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division · South Dakoda School of Mines and Technology
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0076710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00767 ↗
2. 10.1002/er.799310.1002/er.7993 ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20210291710.1002/aenm.202102917 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41586-021-04139-110.1038/s41586-021-04139-1 ↗
5. Kawamura, H.; LaFleur, M.; Iversen, K.; Cheng, H. Front. Technol. Issues: Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Pillar for a Fossil Fuel-Free Economy. 2021.
6. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0258410.1021/acsenergylett.0c02584 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-021-25334-810.1038/s41467-021-25334-8 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41578-022-00478-110.1038/s41578-022-00478-1 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41560-021-00792-y10.1038/s41560-021-00792-y ↗
10. 10.3390/en1416472410.3390/en14164724 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13358910.1016/j.cej.2021.133589 ↗
12. 10.1002/admt.20220043610.1002/admt.202200436 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20210229910.1002/aenm.202102299 ↗
14. 10.1039/C6CS00875E10.1039/C6CS00875E ↗
15. 10.1002/advs.20220405910.1002/advs.202204059 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-022-29199-310.1038/s41467-022-29199-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.13998410.1016/j.electacta.2022.139984 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23130310.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231303 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41570-022-00387-510.1038/s41570-022-00387-5 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.02.00310.1016/j.chempr.2019.02.003 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41565-018-0183-210.1038/s41565-018-0183-2 ↗
22. 10.1002/smsc.20210010710.1002/smsc.202100107 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20220014710.1002/aenm.202200147 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20180029710.1002/aenm.201800297 ↗
25. 10.1002/bte2.2022003410.1002/bte2.20220034 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10833510.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108335 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.06.00710.1016/j.ensm.2021.06.007 ↗
28. 10.1002/cssc.20140250210.1002/cssc.201402502 ↗
29. 10.1002/smll.20190026910.1002/smll.201900269 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23179210.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231792 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23117110.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231171 ↗
32. 10.1039/C8TA03358G10.1039/C8TA03358G ↗
33. 10.1002/smll.20220729010.1002/smll.202207290 ↗
34. 10.1002/admi.20200207410.1002/admi.202002074 ↗
35. 10.3390/nano1221389710.3390/nano12213897 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0526910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05269 ↗
37. 10.3389/fchem.2019.0050010.3389/fchem.2019.00500 ↗
38. 10.1007/s41918-019-00053-310.1007/s41918-019-00053-3 ↗
39. 10.1039/C9TA07147D10.1039/C9TA07147D ↗
40. 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00782-910.1016/S0013-4686(00)00782-9 ↗
41. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac315810.1149/1945-7111/ac3158 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14798310.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147983 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.10010.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.100 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0240010.1021/acsenergylett.0c02400 ↗
45. 10.1021/jp206153n10.1021/jp206153n ↗