High-Performance (Ce, Zr)O2-Free Solid Oxide Fuel Cell with an Active-Sintered Cathode Interface and a Low-Temperature Densified Micron-Scale Barrier Layer
Source abstract
Abstract
Incorporating a dense GDC (Gd 0.1 Ce 0.9 O 1.95 ) barrier layer is an effective strategy to avoid harmful reactions between the LSCF (La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3−δ ) cathode and the YSZ (yttria-stabilized zirconia) electrolyte. In this study, a micron-scale and dense GDC barrier layer is obtained by the combination of spin coating, low-temperature sintering, and hydrothermal-assisted densification. The cell exhibits decent output performance, with a peak power density of 1.07 W/cm 2 at 780 °C. The ohmic and polarization resistances are significantly decreased by ∼44 and ∼36% than the cell with the screen-printed GDC barrier layer, respectively. Due to the low sintering temperature of the GDC barrier layer at 1200 °C, there is nearly no generation of (Ce, Zr)O 2 at the interface of GDC/YSZ. The thin and dense GDC barrier layer effectively shortens the oxygen-ion conduction pathway, as well as hinders Sr migration from the cathode, highlighting its remarkable potential for industrial applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
Key Laboratory of Preparation and Application of Environmental Friendly Materials, Ministry of Education, Jilin Normal University, Changchun 130103, China
Funding
Government of Jiangsu Province · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · Key Laboratory of Preparation and Application of Environmental Friendly Materials
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/1945-7111/accbf010.1149/1945-7111/accbf0 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aba611810.1126/science.aba6118 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.02010.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.020 ↗
4. Brandon N. · 2017
5. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11233910.1016/j.rser.2022.112339 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.09.08510.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.09.085 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.05410.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.054 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0335374410.1007/BF03353744 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.05210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.052 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20120050510.1002/adma.201200505 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.10910.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.109 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.10110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.101 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13141910.1016/j.matlet.2021.131419 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.09.00110.1016/j.jmat.2021.09.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.04310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.043 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.9b1750410.1021/acsami.9b17504 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.07.09410.1016/j.jcis.2019.07.094 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23240010.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232400 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.1c1117510.1021/acsami.1c11175 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.08010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.080 ↗
21. 10.1039/D2RA02035A10.1039/D2RA02035A ↗
22. 10.1039/D1TA00507C10.1039/D1TA00507C ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22677610.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226776 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.00210.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00477-X10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00477-X ↗
26. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0084710.1021/acsaem.8b00847 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.00810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.008 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.02810.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.028 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14047410.1016/j.electacta.2022.140474 ↗
30. 10.1149/2.0031811jes10.1149/2.0031811jes ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.06.00610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.06.006 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.04610.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.046 ↗