journal article·2023-08-02

On the O2 “Surfactant” Effect during Ag/SiO2 Magnetron Sputtering Deposition: The Point of View of In Situ and Real-Time Measurements

Ramiro Zapata, Matteo Balestrieri, Iryna Gozhyk, Hervé Montigaud, Rémi Lazzari

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 30
Publisher page

Abstract

The use of gaseous species has been proposed in the literature to counteract the three-dimensional growth tendency of noble metals on dielectric substrates and favor an earlier percolation without compromising electrical properties. This “surfactant” effect is rationalized herein in the case of O 2 presence during magnetron sputtering deposition of Ag films on SiO 2 . In situ and real-time techniques (X-ray photoemission, film resistivity, UV–visible optical spectroscopy) and ex situ characterizations (X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy) were combined to scrutinize the impact of O 2 addition in the gas flow (%O 2 ), revealing three regimes of evolution of film resistivity, morphology, structure, and chemical composition. At low oxygen flow conditions (%O 2 < 4), the observed drastic decrease of the percolation threshold is assigned to a combination of (i) a change in nanoparticle density, wetting, and crystallographic texture and (ii) a delayed coalescence effect. The driving force is ascribed to the presence of specific adsorbed oxygen moieties, the nature of which starts evolving at intermediate oxygen flow conditions (10 ≤ %O 2 < 20). At high oxygen flow (20 ≤ %O 2 < 40), the found detrimental impact on film resistivity is assigned to an actual oxidation in the form of a Ag 2 O-like poorly crystallized compound. For all %O 2, a composition gradient is observed across the film thickness, with a more metallic Ag at the substrate interface. A correlation between percolation and the nature of the detected O moieties is observed. In parallel to an oxygen spillover mechanism, this gradient can be explained by the competition between different surface processes occurring before percolation, namely, aggregation, metal oxidation, and substrate reactivity. Such findings pave the way to a rational use of O 2 as a modifier for Ag growth.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Semiconductor materials and devices · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Surface du Verre et Interfaces, UMR 125 CNRS/Saint-Gobain Recherche, 39 Quai Lucien Lefranc BP 135, F-93303 Aubervilliers, France

CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Institut des NanoSciences de Paris, UMR 7588, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France

Funding

Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie · Saint-Gobain

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/ncomms983010.1038/ncomms9830 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.08.02610.1016/j.solmat.2016.08.026 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c0029910.1021/acs.cgd.1c00299 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.8b0857810.1021/acsami.8b08578 ↗
5. 10.1116/1.57595110.1116/1.575951 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.238814010.1063/1.2388140 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20130135910.1002/adfm.201301359 ↗
8. 10.1021/am401845n10.1021/am401845n ↗
9. 10.1116/6.000024410.1116/6.0000244 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0073610.1021/acsanm.0c00736 ↗
11. 10.1039/C9NR08076G10.1039/C9NR08076G ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15013510.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150135 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2004.05.00310.1016/j.vacuum.2004.05.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.06110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.061 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00682-010.1016/S0257-8972(03)00682-0 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.10.04310.1016/j.tsf.2004.10.043 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06977.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06977.x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14551510.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145515 ↗
19. 10.1088/0022-3727/46/37/37530510.1088/0022-3727/46/37/375305 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15092710.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150927 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15569910.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155699 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.14938510.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149385 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15699810.1016/j.apsusc.2023.156998 ↗
24. 10.1021/cm00046a02210.1021/cm00046a022 ↗
25. 10.1021/jp980054j10.1021/jp980054j ↗
26. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.02.00510.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.02.005 ↗
27. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.27-262310.3891/acta.chem.scand.27-2623 ↗
28. 10.1021/ac60363a01910.1021/ac60363a019 ↗
29. 10.1016/0368-2048(91)85008-H10.1016/0368-2048(91)85008-H ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.224910.1103/PhysRevB.54.2249 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.319010.1103/PhysRevB.41.3190 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1112610.1103/PhysRevB.62.11126 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00561-X10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00561-X ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.23543110.1103/PhysRevB.65.235431 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp107914e10.1021/jp107914e ↗
36. 10.1039/c2cp22472k10.1039/c2cp22472k ↗
37. 10.1524/zpch.1991.174.Part_1.01110.1524/zpch.1991.174.Part_1.011 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.13910.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.139 ↗
39. Lazzari, R. Igor Pro Paris Photoemission Package can be downloaded with a user guide from: http://www.insp.upmc.fr/I4P-Igor-Pro-Paris-Photoemission.html?lang/en.
40. Moulder J. F. · 1995
41. 10.1016/j.elspec.2022.14722510.1016/j.elspec.2022.147225 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0368-2048(99)00105-X10.1016/S0368-2048(99)00105-X ↗
43. 10.1088/0953-8984/27/22/22320110.1088/0953-8984/27/22/223201 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0040-6090(96)09181-X10.1016/S0040-6090(96)09181-X ↗
45. 10.1021/jp500675h10.1021/jp500675h ↗
46. 10.1088/1361-6463/aaf49410.1088/1361-6463/aaf494 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0265610.1021/acsanm.0c02656 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00679-X10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00679-X ↗
49. Bedeaux D. · 200110.1142/p232 ↗
50. Indrehus, S. Plasmonics Properties of Supported Nanoparticles. Ph.D. thesis, Sorbonne University, 2020.
51. Palik E. D. · 1985 · 1
52. 10.1016/j.physb.2010.01.07610.1016/j.physb.2010.01.076 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.772210.1103/PhysRevB.61.7722 ↗
54. 10.1007/s10051017001410.1007/s100510170014 ↗
55. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/13/13570710.1088/0957-4484/23/13/135707 ↗
56. 10.1107/S160057671500473210.1107/S1600576715004732 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.11544510.1103/PhysRevB.85.115445 ↗
58. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02036.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02036.x ↗
59. 10.1016/0039-6028(85)90634-X10.1016/0039-6028(85)90634-X ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.156110.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1561 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.21310.1103/PhysRevB.61.213 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.23542210.1103/PhysRevB.67.235422 ↗
63. 10.1021/jp504387p10.1021/jp504387p ↗
64. 10.1039/C5CP00342C10.1039/C5CP00342C ↗
65. 10.1021/acsaelm.2c0088810.1021/acsaelm.2c00888 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.23542410.1103/PhysRevB.65.235424 ↗
67. 10.1016/S0167-5729(96)00011-810.1016/S0167-5729(96)00011-8 ↗
68. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.16541210.1103/PhysRevB.68.165412 ↗
69. 10.1016/S0039-6028(03)00514-410.1016/S0039-6028(03)00514-4 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.08.03210.1016/j.commatsci.2018.08.032 ↗