Identification of Microorganisms that Bind Specifically to Target Materials of Interest Using a Magnetophoretic Microfluidic Platform
Source abstract
Abstract
Discovery of microorganisms and their relevant surface peptides that specifically bind to target materials of interest can be achieved through iterative biopanning-based screening of cellular libraries having high diversity. Recently, microfluidics-based biopanning methods have been developed and exploited to overcome the limitations of conventional methods where controlling the shear stress applied to remove cells that do not bind or only weakly bind to target surfaces is difficult and the overall experimental procedure is labor-intensive. Despite the advantages of such microfluidic methods and successful demonstration of their utility, these methods still require several rounds of iterative biopanning. In this work, a magnetophoretic microfluidic biopanning platform was developed to isolate microorganisms that bind to target materials of interest, which is gold in this case. To achieve this, gold-coated magnetic nanobeads, which only attached to microorganisms that exhibit high affinity to gold, were used. The platform was first utilized to screen a bacterial peptide display library, where only the cells with surface peptides that specifically bind to gold could be isolated by the high-gradient magnetic field generated within the microchannel, resulting in enrichment and isolation of many isolates with high affinity and high specificity toward gold even after only a single round of separation. The amino acid profile of the resulting isolates was analyzed to provide a better understanding of the distinctive attributes of peptides that contribute to their specific material-binding capabilities. Next, the microfluidic system was utilized to screen soil microbes, a rich source of extremely diverse microorganisms, successfully isolating many naturally occurring microorganisms that show strong and specific binding to gold. The results show that the developed microfluidic platform is a powerful screening tool for identifying microorganisms that specifically bind to a target material surface of interest, which can greatly accelerate the development of new peptide-driven biological materials and hybrid organic-inorganic materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques · Protist diversity and phylogeny
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
Biotechnology Branch, U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM), Army Research Laboratory (ARL), Adelphi, Maryland 20783, USA
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
Funding
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Army Research Laboratory
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20170344410.1002/adma.201703444 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20180717510.1002/adma.201807175 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20120385310.1002/adma.201203853 ↗
4. 10.1039/D0LC00899K10.1039/D0LC00899K ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c0023910.1021/acs.accounts.1c00239 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.04410.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.044 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.12005510.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120055 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20130164610.1002/adma.201301646 ↗
9. 10.1116/1.511173510.1116/1.5111735 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.10360610.1016/j.jece.2019.103606 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.02010.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.020 ↗
12. 10.1039/b820985e10.1039/b820985e ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.101475310810.1073/pnas.1014753108 ↗
14. 10.1039/C2LC21129G10.1039/C2LC21129G ↗
15. 10.1063/1.493306710.1063/1.4933067 ↗
16. 10.1007/s13206-016-0107-x10.1007/s13206-016-0107-x ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0256310.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02563 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.12181010.1016/j.talanta.2020.121810 ↗
19. 10.1039/D1LC00129A10.1039/D1LC00129A ↗
20. 10.1039/D0LC01146K10.1039/D0LC01146K ↗
21. 10.1371/journal.pone.002692510.1371/journal.pone.0026925 ↗
22. 10.1002/jmr.240010.1002/jmr.2400 ↗
23. 10.4172/2155-9872.100025510.4172/2155-9872.1000255 ↗
24. 10.1002/admt.20210028210.1002/admt.202100282 ↗
25. 10.1093/protein/gzn02010.1093/protein/gzn020 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.07.00410.1016/j.sbi.2007.07.004 ↗
27. 10.1021/ac303284u10.1021/ac303284u ↗
28. 10.1073/pnas.060542210310.1073/pnas.0605422103 ↗
29. 10.1021/la801468c10.1021/la801468c ↗
30. 10.1021/bc300316p10.1021/bc300316p ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0011410.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00114 ↗
32. 10.1021/ac990682c10.1021/ac990682c ↗
33. 10.1021/la050261s10.1021/la050261s ↗
34. 10.1021/la204109r10.1021/la204109r ↗
35. 10.1073/pnas.040856510210.1073/pnas.0408565102 ↗
36. 10.1093/nar/18.20.609710.1093/nar/18.20.6097 ↗
37. 10.1101/gr.84900410.1101/gr.849004 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.01710.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.017 ↗
39. Lindahl, V.; Bakken, L. R. Evaluation Of Methods For Extraction Of Bacteria From Soil. 1995, 16 (2), 135–142, 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1995.tb00277.x.10.1111/j.1574-6941.1995.tb00277.x ↗
40. 10.1128/AEM.02710-1310.1128/AEM.02710-13 ↗
41. 10.3791/5606110.3791/56061 ↗