Optimization of Thermal Conductance at Interfaces Using Machine Learning Algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
Optimization of thermal transport across the interface of two different materials is critical to micro-/nanoscale electronic, photonic, and phononic devices. Although several examples of compositional intermixing at the interfaces having a positive effect on interfacial thermal conductance (ITC) have been reported, an optimum arrangement has not yet been determined because of the large number of potential atomic configurations and the significant computational cost of evaluation. On the other hand, computation-driven materials design efforts are rising in popularity and importance. Yet, the scalability and transferability of machine learning models remain as challenges in creating a complete pipeline for the simulation and analysis of large molecular systems. In this work we present a scalable Bayesian optimization framework, which leverages dynamic spawning of jobs through the Message Passing Interface (MPI) to run multiple parallel molecular dynamics simulations within a parent MPI job to optimize heat transfer at the silicon and aluminum (Si/Al) interface. We found a maximum of 50% increase in the ITC when introducing a two-layer intermixed region that consists of a higher percentage of Si. Because of the random nature of the intermixing, the magnitude of increase in the ITC varies. We observed that both homogeneity/heterogeneity of the intermixing and the intrinsic stochastic nature of molecular dynamics simulations account for the variance in ITC.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, Virginia 23606, United States
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States
Funding
Laboratory Directed Research and Development
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.4010.1038/nphoton.2009.40 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmat.2015.01.00110.1016/j.jmat.2015.01.001 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.aav730410.1126/science.aav7304 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0062710.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00627 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.03543810.1103/PhysRevB.84.035438 ↗
6. 10.1115/1.289734410.1115/1.2897344 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.369505810.1063/1.3695058 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.500836710.1063/1.5008367 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.474887210.1063/1.4748872 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.02.11710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.02.117 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.475794110.1063/1.4757941 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.23530410.1103/PhysRevB.86.235304 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.07531610.1103/PhysRevB.79.075316 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.01.04010.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.01.040 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.03543810.1103/PhysRevB.85.035438 ↗
16. 10.1109/JPROC.1998.65876210.1109/JPROC.1998.658762 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.06210.1016/j.cub.2010.11.062 ↗
18. 10.1085/jgp.20091037310.1085/jgp.200910373 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.489913010.1063/1.4899130 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.04231910.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319 ↗
21. Alexandera A. · J. Mater. Res. · 2017 · 32 · 406710.1557/jmr.2017.322 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.175830110.1063/1.1758301 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.20531110.1103/PhysRevB.85.205311 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.501498710.1063/1.5014987 ↗
25. Kubo R. · 2012 · 31
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.14430610.1103/PhysRevB.65.144306 ↗
27. Kaufmann E. · Artificial intelligence and statistics · 2012 · 592
28. Auer P. · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2002 · 3 · 397
29. Frazier P. I. · arXiv:1807.02811 · 2018
30. 10.1109/TIT.2011.218203310.1109/TIT.2011.2182033 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.47327110.1063/1.473271 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.16530410.1103/PhysRevB.80.165304 ↗
33. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.24510210.1103/PhysRevB.85.245102 ↗
35. 10.1103/RevModPhys.41.4810.1103/RevModPhys.41.48 ↗
36. 10.1145/1364782.136480210.1145/1364782.1364802 ↗
37. Shaw D. E. · Anton 2: Raising the Bar for Performance and Programmability in a Special- Purpose Molecular Dynamics Supercomputer · 2014 · 41
38. Brochu E. · A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization of Expensive Cost Functions, with Application to Active User Modeling and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning · 2010
39. 10.2307/200841910.2307/2008419 ↗
40. Mockus J. · Towards Global Optimization · 1978 · 2 · 2
41. Hoffman M. · Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · 2011 · 327
42. Walker D. W. · Standards for Message-Passing in a Distributed Memory Environment · 1992
43. Brockman, G.; Cheung, V.; Pettersson, L.; Schneider, J.; Schulman, J.; Tang, J.; Zaremba, W. OpenAI Gym, 2016.
44. 10.3389/fenrg.2018.000410.3389/fenrg.2018.0004 ↗
45. 10.1115/IHTC14-2226810.1115/IHTC14-22268 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.07544910.1103/PhysRevB.102.075449 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRev.109.149210.1103/PhysRev.109.1492 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10442810.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104428 ↗