journal article·2025-01-08

Molybdenum Disulfide/Diselenide-Laser-Induced Graphene–Glycine Oxidase Composite for Electrochemical Sensing of Glyphosate

Rayhane Zribi, Zachary T. Johnson, Griffin Ellis, Christopher Banwart, Jemima Opare-Addo, Shelby L. Hooe, Joyce Breger, Antonino Foti, Pietro G. Gucciardi, Emily A. Smith, Carmen L. Gomes, Igor L. Medintz, Giovanni Neri, Jonathan C. Claussen

Publisher page

Abstract

The widespread use of the pesticide glyphosate has raised concerns regarding its potential health and environmental impacts. Consequently, there is an increasing demand for monitoring glyphosate levels in surface waters and food products. Currently, there is no commercially available rapid, field-deployable sensor capable of quantifying glyphosate concentrations in environmental samples. This study presents the development of a biosensor based on laser-induced graphene (LIG) that is functionalized with transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) and the enzyme glycine oxidase. The LIG is created through a scalable process using a CO 2 laser to convert polyimide into a porous, nano/microstructured graphene architecture. The high surface area of LIG acts as a conductive scaffold for subsequent functionalization of both molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) and molybdenum diselenide (MoSe 2 ) to further improve the electroactive surface area of the electrode. The resultant sensors, functionalizesd with the enzyme, demonstrate linear sensing ranges from 10 to 90 μM for glyphosate with detection limits of 4.0 and 6.1 μM for LIG electrodes modified with MoS 2 and MoSe 2, respectively. Furthermore, the sensors detect glyphosphate at negative working potentials, helping to minimize interference from endogeneous electroactive species and to provide consistent glyphosphate monitoring in actual food products (i.e., soybeans and pinto beans). Overall, the biosensors integrate scalable manufacturing with cost-effective TMDs and LIG, eliminating the need for costly noble metals in the biosensor design, and offering a reliable method for assessing glyphosate in food products.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering, University of Messina, C.da Di Dio, Messina I-98166, Italy

CNR IPCF Istituto per i Processi Chimico-Fisici, viale F. Stagno D’Alcontres 37, Messina I-98156, Italy

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States

Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States

U.S. Department of Energy, The Ames Laboratory, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States

Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Code 6900, Washington D.C. 20375, United States

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture · U.S. Naval Research Laboratory · Office of Naval Research · U.S. Department of Energy · NextGenerationEU · National Science Foundation · NRL Nanoscience Institute

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13716710.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137167 ↗
2. 10.1186/s12302-018-0184-710.1186/s12302-018-0184-7 ↗
3. 10.3390/su1004095010.3390/su10040950 ↗
4. 10.1002/ADMT.20200124210.1002/ADMT.202001242 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0051110.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00511 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13788110.1016/j.electacta.2021.137881 ↗
7. 10.1039/C7AN00455A10.1039/C7AN00455A ↗
8. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.07710.1016/j.aca.2020.07.077 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.12775310.1016/j.snb.2020.127753 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.saa.2011.01.03710.1016/j.saa.2011.01.037 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.10.00210.1016/j.tibtech.2019.10.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70160-210.1016/S1369-7021(11)70160-2 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00216-021-03519-w10.1007/s00216-021-03519-w ↗
14. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.11390610.1016/j.bios.2021.113906 ↗
15. 10.1021/ACSNANO.1C0419710.1021/ACSNANO.1C04197 ↗
16. 10.3390/foods1212227710.3390/foods12122277 ↗
17. 10.1002/gch2.20220005710.1002/gch2.202200057 ↗
18. 10.1002/celc.20190014310.1002/celc.201900143 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12242110.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122421 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.flatc.2020.10018710.1016/j.flatc.2020.100187 ↗
21. 10.3390/s2104137110.3390/s21041371 ↗
22. 10.1021/nl302584w10.1021/nl302584w ↗
23. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.12722910.1016/j.snb.2019.127229 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2007.09.00610.1016/j.jelechem.2007.09.006 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11489310.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114893 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.13410510.1016/j.snb.2023.134105 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0062210.1021/acsanm.1c00622 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00604-016-2062-610.1007/s00604-016-2062-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14143310.1016/j.electacta.2022.141433 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20110258410.1002/adma.201102584 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.06.01110.1016/j.bios.2017.06.011 ↗
32. Hägele, F. Glyphosate in Fruits and Vegetables – as Present as in the Media? https://www.cvuas.de/pesticides/beitrag_en.asp?subid=1&Thema_ID=5&ID=3187&lang=EN&Pdf=No. (Accessed 24 July 2023).
33. 10.1038/ncomms671410.1038/ncomms6714 ↗
34. 10.1074/jbc.M109.05163110.1074/jbc.M109.051631 ↗
35. 10.3390/s2018540410.3390/s20185404 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.8b2238910.1021/acsami.8b22389 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12589710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125897 ↗
38. 10.1002/CHEM.20190552410.1002/CHEM.201905524 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0722810.1021/acsnano.5b07228 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.11.00910.1016/j.carbon.2021.11.009 ↗
41. 10.1002/adma.20200353410.1002/adma.202003534 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 ↗
43. 10.1088/2043-6262/4/3/03501210.1088/2043-6262/4/3/035012 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10853-020-04478-w10.1007/s10853-020-04478-w ↗
45. 10.1002/ADMA.20160269710.1002/ADMA.201602697 ↗
46. 10.1039/C7RA12897E10.1039/C7RA12897E ↗
47. 10.1002/ADMI.20200014010.1002/ADMI.202000140 ↗
48. 10.1002/celc.20210114610.1002/celc.202101146 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15886510.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158865 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0378610.1021/acsanm.3c03786 ↗
51. 10.2144/04375RV0110.2144/04375RV01 ↗
52. 10.3390/ma1201012110.3390/ma12010121 ↗
53. 10.1039/D4NH00010B10.1039/D4NH00010B ↗
54. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.11315410.1016/j.bios.2021.113154 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b0036110.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00361 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijoes.2023.10003410.1016/j.ijoes.2023.100034 ↗
57. 10.1007/s00253-010-3073-610.1007/s00253-010-3073-6 ↗
58. Shimelis, O. I.; Marsala, T.; Ross, M. J. Simplified LC-MS/MS Method for Glyphosate, AMPA, and Glufosinate in Oat-Based Cereals. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/technical-documents/technical-article/food-and-beverage-testing-and-manufacturing/chemical-analysis-for-food-and-beverage/simplified-lc-ms-ms-method-for-glyphosate-ampa-and-glufosinate-in-oat-based-cereals?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIpLPG4OmqgAMVFymzAB2-xAwAEAAYASAAEgLGpfD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds. (Accessed 24 July 2023).
59. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.14849610.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148496 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b0036210.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00362 ↗