journal article·2024-06-05Open access

Correlation between Ca Release and Osteoconduction by 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite-Based Templates

Mohamad N. Hassan, Ahmed M. Eltawila, Samih Mohamed-Ahmed, Wessam M. Amin, Salwa Suliman, Sherif Kandil, Mohammed A. Yassin, Kamal Mustafa

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 22

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The application of hydroxyapatite (HA)-based templates is quite often seen in bone tissue engineering since that HA is an osteoconductive bioceramic material, which mimics the inorganic component of mineralized tissues. However, the reported osteoconductivity varies in vitro and in vivo, and the levels of calcium (Ca) release most favorable to osteoconduction have yet to be determined. In this study, HA-based templates were fabricated by melt-extrusion 3D-printing and characterized in order to determine a possible correlation between Ca release and osteoconduction. The HA-based templates were blended with poly(lactide- co -trimethylene carbonate) (PLATMC) at three different HA ratios: 10, 30, and 50%. The printability and physical properties of the HA templates were compared with those of pristine PLATMC. In vitro, osteoconductivity was assessed using seeded human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. A mild rate of Ca release was observed for HA10 templates, which exhibited higher mineralized extracellular matrix (ECM) secretion than PLATMC at 14 and 21 days. In contrast, the high rate of Ca release exhibited by HA30 and HA50 templates was associated with reduced osteoconduction and impeded mineralized ECM secretion in vitro. Similar results were observed in vivo. In the calvarial defect model in rabbit, PLATMC and HA10 templates exhibited the highest amount of new bone formation, with obvious contact osteogenesis on their surfaces. In contrast, HA30 and HA50 exhibited distant osteogenesis and reduced amounts of new bone ingrowth. It is concluded that HA-based templates are osteoconductive only at low rates of Ca release.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 19, Bergen 5009, Norway

Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Helse Bergen, Haukelandsveien 28, Bergen 5021, Norway

Department of Materials Science, Institute of Graduate Studies and Research (IGSR), Alexandria University, El-Shatby, Alexandria 21526, Egypt

Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Delta University for Science and Technology, Coastal International Road, Gamasa 11152, Egypt

Biomaterials Section, Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 19, Bergen 5009, Norway

Funding

Trond Mohn stiftelse · Norges Forskningsråd · Olav Thon Stiftelsen

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1089/ten.teb.2008.008310.1089/ten.teb.2008.0083 ↗
2. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.04910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.049 ↗
4. 10.1201/9780203491430.ch2310.1201/9780203491430.ch23 ↗
5. 10.1186/s40824-018-0149-310.1186/s40824-018-0149-3 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.100360010710.1073/pnas.1003600107 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.11.04410.1016/j.ceramint.2015.11.044 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.00810.1016/j.dental.2014.03.008 ↗
9. Artzi Z. · Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implant. · 2004 · 19 · 357
10. 10.1097/01.prs.0000287133.43718.8910.1097/01.prs.0000287133.43718.89 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.7b1417510.1021/acsami.7b14175 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.00310.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.003 ↗
13. 10.1093/rb/rbab02110.1093/rb/rbab021 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.0c1385110.1021/acsami.0c13851 ↗
15. Barrère F. · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2006 · 1 · 317
16. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.00210.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.00910.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.009 ↗
18. 10.1088/1748-6041/4/2/02500410.1088/1748-6041/4/2/025004 ↗
19. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0092210.3389/fbioe.2020.00922 ↗
20. 10.1186/s40824-022-00299-x10.1186/s40824-022-00299-x ↗
21. 10.1557/jmr.2018.11210.1557/jmr.2018.112 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.10444510.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.104445 ↗
23. 10.1002/jbm.a.3145410.1002/jbm.a.31454 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.00610.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.006 ↗
25. 10.1186/s13287-018-0914-110.1186/s13287-018-0914-1 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.b.3482410.1002/jbm.b.34824 ↗
27. 10.1038/ncomms233910.1038/ncomms2339 ↗
28. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.78346810.3389/fbioe.2021.783468 ↗
29. 10.1186/s13287-021-02642-w10.1186/s13287-021-02642-w ↗
30. 10.1177/2041731421101937510.1177/20417314211019375 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.01010.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.010 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.024 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.01710.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.017 ↗
34. 10.1126/sciadv.abg308910.1126/sciadv.abg3089 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.00110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.001 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10856-012-4761-910.1007/s10856-012-4761-9 ↗