Sulfonated Poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene ether)-Modified Mixed-Matrix Bifunctional Polyelectrolyte Membranes for Long-Run Anthrarufin-Based Redox Flow Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
The resurgence in designing polyelectrolyte membrane (PEM) materials has propound grid-scale electrochemical energy storage devices. Herein, we report on studies corroborating the synergistic influence of ionic domain microstructure modification and intercalation of telechelic bis-piperidinium-functionalized graphene oxide (GO) to fabricate stable bifunctional membranes from sulfonated poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene ether) (sPPE) for efficient anthrarufin-based alkaline redox flow batteries. A critically long-lasting quest on alkaline stability and – OH conductivity dilemma in hydrocarbon-based PEMs is meticulously resolved via a bifunctional ion-conducting matrix. Preferential studies on hydrophilic domain distribution in sPPE suggest that, with high microphase homogeneity, higher specific capacity retentions are achievable during galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) analysis. Moreover, the low-capacity issues were overcome by improving the redoxolyte–membrane interface affinities incorporating bis-piperidinium-bearing graphene oxide (bis-QGO). Consequently, at 1.0 and 2.0 wt % intercalation of bis-QGO, the bifunctional polyelectrolyte membranes (BFPMs) impart lowest overpotentials of 93 mV (for BFPM-1.0) and ∼100 mV (for BFPM-2.0) which are ∼43 and 40% lower than that of Nafion-117 (i.e., ∼164 mV). Furthermore, the efficiency of BFPMs, viz., the Coulombic, voltage, and energy efficiencies, was ∼95–98%, ∼85%, and ≥80% at 20 mA cm –2, respectively. In long-cycling operations, the GCD profile evidenced ∼99% efficiency retention over 450 cycles and illustrated reproducible rate capability. Finally, the polarization studies of BFPMs revealed ∼54% higher peak power density (87.5 mW cm –2 ) delivery than Nafion-117 (∼57 mW cm –2 ). We believe that this strategic designing approach could offer newer and simple avenues to avail high-performance BFPMs at low intercalation loads for alkaline electrochemical energy storage and related applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute (CSIR-CSMCRI), Bhavnagar 364002, India
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201002, India
Department of Chemistry, Clean Energy Lab, Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT-M), Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600036, India
Funding
University Grants Commission · ONGC Energy Centre · Ministry of Education, India
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.8010.1038/natrevmats.2016.80 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0220510.1021/acsenergylett.0c02205 ↗
3. 10.1002/anie.20220758010.1002/anie.202207580 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mtnano.2019.10004410.1016/j.mtnano.2019.100044 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0139210.1021/acsaem.2c01392 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20160492510.1002/anie.201604925 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20210561910.1002/anie.202105619 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.6b0352910.1021/acsami.6b03529 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.0c1317210.1021/acsami.0c13172 ↗
10. PEMION hydrocarbon membrane and polymer set to disrupt heavy-duty fuel cell applications; Ionomr Innovations, 2022. https://ionomr.com/2022/09/pemion-hydrocarbon-membrane-and-polymer-set-to-disrupt-heavy-duty-fuel-cell-applications/ (accessed Nov 8, 2022).
11. 10.1039/c4ta02124j10.1039/c4ta02124j ↗
12. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.04310.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.043 ↗
13. 10.1149/2.1291805jes10.1149/2.1291805jes ↗
14. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.00810.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.008 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0137710.1021/acs.iecr.9b01377 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-021-23721-910.1038/s41467-021-23721-9 ↗
17. 10.3390/membranes1105036710.3390/membranes11050367 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-022-30943-y10.1038/s41467-022-30943-y ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20170205610.1002/aenm.201702056 ↗
20. 10.1039/D0RA08316J10.1039/D0RA08316J ↗
21. 10.1126/science.aab303310.1126/science.aab3033 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cattod.2020.12.01210.1016/j.cattod.2020.12.012 ↗
23. 10.1039/D1TA08900E10.1039/D1TA08900E ↗
24. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0112810.1021/acsaem.0c01128 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0026310.1021/acsaem.2c00263 ↗
26. 10.1039/C8CC03058H10.1039/C8CC03058H ↗
27. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.02510.1016/j.joule.2019.08.025 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.01310.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.013 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.11.02210.1016/j.jiec.2013.11.022 ↗
30. 10.1039/C2JM32296J10.1039/C2JM32296J ↗
31. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12108210.1016/j.memsci.2022.121082 ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20210216710.1002/adfm.202102167 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13945710.1016/j.cej.2022.139457 ↗
34. 10.1039/D2RA04151K10.1039/D2RA04151K ↗
35. 10.1021/la027083c10.1021/la027083c ↗
36. Hebbar R. S. · 2017 · 21910.1016/B978-0-444-63776-5.00012-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0001-8686(98)00087-610.1016/S0001-8686(98)00087-6 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0065510.1021/acsenergylett.6b00655 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20150411710.1002/adma.201504117 ↗
40. 10.1109/IESC.2017.816748910.1109/IESC.2017.8167489 ↗