journal article·2023-03-07Open access

Linear Binary Classifier to Predict Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Polyacrylates

Leonardo Contreas, Andrew L. Hook, David A. Winkler, Grazziela Figueredo, Paul Williams, Charles A. Laughton, Morgan R. Alexander, Philip M. Williams

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Bacterial infections are increasingly problematic due to the rise of antimicrobial resistance. Consequently, the rational design of materials naturally resistant to biofilm formation is an important strategy for preventing medical device-associated infections. Machine learning (ML) is a powerful method to find useful patterns in complex data from a wide range of fields. Recent reports showed how ML can reveal strong relationships between bacterial adhesion and the physicochemical properties of polyacrylate libraries. These studies used robust and predictive nonlinear regression methods that had better quantitative prediction power than linear models. However, as nonlinear models’ feature importance is a local rather than global property, these models were hard to interpret and provided limited insight into the molecular details of material–bacteria interactions. Here, we show that the use of interpretable mass spectral molecular ions and chemoinformatic descriptors and a linear binary classification model of attachment of three common nosocomial pathogens to a library of polyacrylates can provide improved guidance for the design of more effective pathogen-resistant coatings. Relevant features from each model were analyzed and correlated with easily interpretable chemoinformatic descriptors to derive a small set of rules that give model features tangible meaning that elucidate relationships between the structure and function. The results show that the attachment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus can be robustly predicted by chemoinformatic descriptors, suggesting that the obtained models can predict the attachment response to polyacrylates to identify anti-attachment materials to synthesize and test in the future.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · Oral microbiology and periodontitis research · Antimicrobial agents and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia

Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia

School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, United Kingdom

National Biofilms Innovation Centre and Biodiscovery Institute, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/00333549071220020510.1177/003335490712200205 ↗
2. Scott, D. The Direct Medical Costs of Healthcare-Associated Infections in U.S. Hospitals and the Benefits of Prevention; 2009.
3. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-03336710.1136/bmjopen-2019-033367 ↗
4. 10.1179/2047773215Y.000000003010.1179/2047773215Y.0000000030 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.015 ↗
6. 10.1111/2049-632X.1215510.1111/2049-632X.12155 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20120493610.1002/adma.201204936 ↗
8. 10.1086/50257710.1086/502577 ↗
9. 10.22203/eCM.v008a0510.22203/eCM.v008a05 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0927-7765(01)00240-510.1016/S0927-7765(01)00240-5 ↗
11. 10.1177/002203451558769010.1177/0022034515587690 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.00110.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.001 ↗
13. 10.1099/0022-1317-50-7-58210.1099/0022-1317-50-7-582 ↗
14. 10.1093/infdis/158.4.69310.1093/infdis/158.4.693 ↗
15. 10.2436/im.v9i1.954510.2436/im.v9i1.9545 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.362925810.1126/science.3629258 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cobme.2018.03.00510.1016/j.cobme.2018.03.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12074010.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120740 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.03.01810.1016/j.matt.2020.03.018 ↗
20. 10.1002/advs.20190339210.1002/advs.201903392 ↗
21. 10.1002/qsar.20061015110.1002/qsar.200610151 ↗
22. 10.1038/nbt.231610.1038/nbt.2316 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20130287710.1002/adfm.201302877 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.7b1419710.1021/acsami.7b14197 ↗
25. 10.1002/qsar.20081020210.1002/qsar.200810202 ↗
26. Mauri A. · Match · 2006 · 56 · 237
27. 10.1007/978-3-319-19425-710.1007/978-3-319-19425-7 ↗
28. Landrum, G. RDKit: Open-Source Cheminformatics Software. (accessed 2021-06-14).
29. 10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-310.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 ↗
30. Nnamoko N. · Age · 2014 · 21 · 63
31. 10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00043-X10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00043-X ↗
32. 10.1093/aje/kwk05210.1093/aje/kwk052 ↗
33. 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7_1610.1007/978-0-387-84858-7_16 ↗
34. 10.2307/458629410.2307/4586294 ↗
35. 10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-910.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 ↗
36. 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-710.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 ↗
37. 10.1186/s13040-021-00244-z10.1186/s13040-021-00244-z ↗
38. 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.02.02310.1016/j.patcog.2019.02.023 ↗
39. 10.1002/0470011815.b2a1002010.1002/0470011815.b2a10020 ↗
40. 10.2307/298360410.2307/2983604 ↗
41. 10.1002/9783906390437.ch1710.1002/9783906390437.ch17 ↗
42. 10.2174/09298670978700281710.2174/092986709787002817 ↗
43. 10.1021/ja00402a07110.1021/ja00402a071 ↗
44. 10.1038/nchem.124310.1038/nchem.1243 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41598-018-36597-510.1038/s41598-018-36597-5 ↗
46. 10.1002/adhm.20140064810.1002/adhm.201400648 ↗
47. 10.1002/adma.20190351310.1002/adma.201903513 ↗