Niobium Carbide and Tantalum Carbide as Nitrogen Reduction Electrocatalysts: Catalytic Activity, Carbophilicity, and the Importance of Intermediate Oxidation States
Source abstract
Abstract
Significant interest in the electrocatalytic reduction of molecular nitrogen to ammonia (the nitrogen reduction reaction: NRR) has focused attention on transition metal carbides as possible electrocatalysts. However, a fundamental understanding of carbide surface structure/NRR reactivity relationships is sparse. Herein, electrochemistry, DFT-based calculations, and in situ photoemission studies demonstrate that NbC, deposited by magnetron sputter deposition, is active for NRR at pH 3.2 but only after immersion of an ambient-induced Nb 2 O 5 surface layer in 0.3 M NaOH, which leaves Nb suboxides with niobium in intermediate formal oxidation states. Photoemission data, however, show that polarization to −1.3 V vs Ag/AgCl restores the Nb 2 O 5 overlayer, correlating with electrochemical measurements showing inhibition of NRR activity under these conditions. In contrast, a similar treatment of a sputter-deposited TaC sample in 0.3 M NaOH fails to reduce the ambient-induced Ta 2 O 5 surface layer, and TaC is inactive for NRR at potentials more positive than −1.0 V even though a significant cathodic current is observed. A TaC sample with surface oxide partially reduced by Ar ion sputtering in UHV prior to in situ transfer to UHV exhibits a restored Ta 2 O 5 surface layer after electrochemical polarization to −1.0 V vs Ag/AgCl. The electrochemical and photoemission results are in accord with DFT-based calculations indicating greater N≡N bond activation for N 2 bound end-on to Nb(IV) and Nb(III) sites than for N 2 bound end-on to Nb(V) sites. Thus, theory and experiment demonstrate that with respect to NbC, the formation and stabilization of intermediate (non-d 0 ) oxidation states for surface transition metal ions is critical for N≡N bond activation and NRR activity. Additionally, the Nb suboxide surface, formed by immersion in 0.3 M NaOH of ambient-exposed NbC, is shown to undergo reoxidation to catalytically inactive Nb 2 O 5 at −1.3 V vs Ag/AgCl, possibly due to hydrolysis or other, as yet not understood, phenomena.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle, No. 305070, Denton, Texas 76203-5017, United States
Funding
Division of Chemistry · Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure · University of North Texas · Division of Materials Research
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/aesr.20200004310.1002/aesr.202000043 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0065910.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00659 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr020460610.1021/cr0204606 ↗
4. 10.1039/c3ra44305a10.1039/c3ra44305a ↗
5. 10.1039/C9MH01094G10.1039/C9MH01094G ↗
6. 10.1002/cphc.20210078110.1002/cphc.202100781 ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.1c1062010.1021/jacs.1c10620 ↗
8. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0449110.1021/acscatal.2c04491 ↗
9. 10.1021/cs500182h10.1021/cs500182h ↗
10. 10.1080/1536383X.2021.201445610.1080/1536383X.2021.2014456 ↗
11. 10.1002/sia.107410.1002/sia.1074 ↗
12. 10.1063/5.010767810.1063/5.0107678 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b0170210.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01702 ↗
14. 10.1039/C9TA05155D10.1039/C9TA05155D ↗
15. 10.1002/smtd.20180038610.1002/smtd.201800386 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.01.02010.1016/j.cclet.2021.01.020 ↗
17. 10.1039/C8QI01049H10.1039/C8QI01049H ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.04510.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.045 ↗
19. 10.1088/1361-648X/acd49d10.1088/1361-648X/acd49d ↗
20. 10.1116/1.512810210.1116/1.5128102 ↗
21. Briggs D. · 1990
22. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.05210.1016/j.solener.2019.07.052 ↗
23. 10.1021/jp207612r10.1021/jp207612r ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.28410.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.284 ↗
25. 10.1371/journal.pone.009559010.1371/journal.pone.0095590 ↗
26. 10.1002/sia.74010050210.1002/sia.740100502 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00484-110.1016/S0039-6028(98)00484-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.08910.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.089 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.11067510.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110675 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.360641610.1063/1.3606416 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.14310.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.143 ↗
32. 10.1002/sia.684510.1002/sia.6845 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.03810.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.038 ↗
34. 10.1039/C9RA07318C10.1039/C9RA07318C ↗
35. Moulder J. F. · 1995
36. 10.1002/jcc.2105710.1002/jcc.21057 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.361610.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.213966810.1063/1.2139668 ↗
41. 10.1039/C6RA28745J10.1039/C6RA28745J ↗
42. 10.1134/S106378341509035810.1134/S1063783415090358 ↗
43. 10.1039/C4AY01945H10.1039/C4AY01945H ↗
44. 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.10083310.1016/j.mtla.2020.100833 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.02.00510.1016/j.materresbull.2015.02.005 ↗
46. 10.1002/asia.20160159010.1002/asia.201601590 ↗
47. 10.1002/aenm.20220235110.1002/aenm.202202351 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10853-021-06178-510.1007/s10853-021-06178-5 ↗
49. 10.1002/cphc.20170012610.1002/cphc.201700126 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10008-013-2216-y10.1007/s10008-013-2216-y ↗
51. 10.1021/ct200866d10.1021/ct200866d ↗
52. 10.1021/acsami.1c1610410.1021/acsami.1c16104 ↗
53. 10.1039/D2TA05180J10.1039/D2TA05180J ↗
54. 10.5772/6105610.5772/61056 ↗
55. 10.1039/D1TA06453C10.1039/D1TA06453C ↗