journal article·2023-09-20

Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Revealed the Mechanism of Arsenate Removal by the Fe/Mn Oxide-Based Composite under Conditions of Fully Saturated Sorption Sites

Natalia Chubar, Małgorzata Szlachta, Vasyl Gerda

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 37
Publisher page

Abstract

Molecular mechanism of arsenate removal by a promising inorganic composite based on Fe/Mn oxides and MnCO 3 was studied under the rarely investigated conditions of fully saturated sorption sites (characteristic of dynamic sorption, such as water treatment plants) at the pH of 4/6/7/8 using As K-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS)/X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Comparison of arsenic speciation in the initial adsorbate solution (calculated by Visual MINTEQ) and after sorption (determined by As 3d XPS) allowed the interpretation of the initializing forces of the interfacial processes. Contribution of various solid phases of this composite anion exchanger to the removal of arsenate was disclosed by examining the Fe 2p 3/2 and Mn 2p 3/2 XPS spectra supported by FTIR. As K-edge EXAFS simulation not only proved the chemisorptive binding of aqueous As(V) anions to the Fe/Mn oxide-based adsorbent but also demonstrated the presence of a variety of sorption sites in this complex structured porous material, which became available step-wise upon an increasing pressure on the interface with high arsenate loading during the long-term sorption process. The type of inner-sphere complexation of As(V) on the saturated surface discovered by As K-edge EXAFS modeling was a function of pH. Analysis of EXAFS fitting data resulted in suggestion of a methodological idea on how the EXAFS-derived coordination numbers can be used to distinguish the localization of adsorbed ions (surface versus structure emptiness). This work also provides more insights into the superiority of composite adsorbents (compared to the materials based on individual compounds) in terms of their capability to adapt/change the molecular sorption mechanism in order to inactivate (remove) more toxic aqueous anions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Arsenic contamination and mitigation · Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Analytical chemistry methods development

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, Utrecht 3584 CD, Netherlands

Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, Wrocław 50-370, Poland

Faculty of Chemistry, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Lva Tolstogo Street 12, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine

Funding

Global Collaborative Research, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · Dutch Research Council (NWO)

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Website of World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/arsenic (accessed Aug 18, 2023).
2. Clearfield A. · 1982
3. Reidies A. H. · 2007
4. Draft Report, EPA-815 P-01-001. Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic from Drink Water, 1999; p 289. https://nepis.epa.gov/ (accessed Aug 18, 2023).
5. 10.1016/j.cis.2017.04.01310.1016/j.cis.2017.04.013 ↗
6. 10.1021/es072057s10.1021/es072057s ↗
7. 10.2138/am.2014.465710.2138/am.2014.4657 ↗
8. 10.1021/es501527c10.1021/es501527c ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.0c1408810.1021/acsami.0c14088 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.5b0873010.1021/acsami.5b08730 ↗
11. 10.1021/am201332210.1021/am2013322 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.7b0127510.1021/acsami.7b01275 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.09.02310.1016/j.jcis.2011.09.023 ↗
14. 10.1107/S090904950802332710.1107/S0909049508023327 ↗
15. Ravel, B. EXAFS Analysis with FEFF and FEFFIT. Part 2: Commentary, version 0.04, 2000. http://feff.phys.washington.edu/ravel/ (assessed July 04, 2014). Note: This web-page is not active anymore.
16. 10.1107/S090904950501271910.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
17. 10.1107/S056774087500266X10.1107/S056774087500266X ↗
18. Moore P. B. · Am. Mineral. · 1971 · 56 · 1539
19. 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00242-610.1016/S0925-8388(02)00242-6 ↗
20. Graeser S. · Am. Mineral. · 1989 · 74 · 676
21. 10.1007/s40726-016-0028-210.1007/s40726-016-0028-2 ↗
22. 10.2138/rmg.2014.79.410.2138/rmg.2014.79.4 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0292910.1021/acsomega.8b02929 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.01910.1016/j.cej.2016.02.019 ↗
25. 10.1021/es503606j10.1021/es503606j ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.06610.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.066 ↗
27. 10.1039/C4TA03463E10.1039/C4TA03463E ↗
28. 10.1107/S205698901701347010.1107/S2056989017013470 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0709210.1021/acs.est.9b07092 ↗
30. 10.1039/C9EM00267G10.1039/C9EM00267G ↗
31. 10.1021/es501527c10.1021/es501527c ↗
32. 10.1021/es050889p10.1021/es050889p ↗
33. 10.1021/es072057s10.1021/es072057s ↗
34. 10.1016/j.gca.2012.11.01610.1016/j.gca.2012.11.016 ↗
35. 10.30684/etj.36.9A.110.30684/etj.36.9A.1 ↗
36. 10.1002/sia.198410.1002/sia.1984 ↗
37. Crist B. V. · 2018 · 2
38. 10.1021/acsorginorgau.3c0000710.1021/acsorginorgau.3c00007 ↗