journal article·2023-07-12Open access

β-Glucan-Mediated Oral Codelivery of 5FU and Bcl2 siRNA Attenuates Stomach Cancer

Humayra Afrin, Stephanie Vargas Esquivel, Raj Kumar, Md Ikhtiar Zahid, Beu Oporeza, Md Fashiar Rahman, Thomas Boland, Md Nurunnabi

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 27

Abstract

Based on cancer-related deaths, stomach cancer is ranked fifth, and first among Hispanics. Lack of technologies for early diagnosis and unavailability of target-specific therapeutics are largely the causes of the poor therapeutic outcomes from existing chemotherapeutics. Currently available therapeutic modalities are invasive and require systemic delivery, although the cancer is localized in the stomach at its early stage. Therefore, we hypothesize that an oral local delivery approach can extend the retention duration of the therapeutics modalities within the stomach and thereby enhance therapeutic efficacy. To accomplish this, we have developed a ß-glucan (BG)-based oral delivery vehicle that can adhere to the mucus lining of the stomach for an extended period while controlling the release of Bcl2 siRNA and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) payload for over 6 h. We found that Bcl2 siRNA selectively knocked down the Bcl2 gene in a C57BL/6 stomach cancer mouse model followed by upregulation of apoptosis and remission of cancer. BG was found to be very effective in maintaining the stability of siRNA for at least 6 h, when submerged in simulated gastric juice tested in vitro. To investigate the potential therapeutic effects in vivo, we used a stomach cancer mouse model, where C57BL/6 mice were treated with 5FU, BG/5FU, siRNA, BG/siRNA, and BG/5FU/siRNA. Higher inhibition of Bcl2 and therapeutic efficacy were observed in mice treated with BG/5FU/siRNA confirmed with Western blotting and a TUNEL assay. Significant reduction in the tumor region was observed with histology (H&E) and immunohistochemistry (Ki67, TUNEL, and Bcl2) analyses. Overall, the oral formulation shows improved efficacy with nonsignificant side effects compared to the conventional treatment tested in the gastric cancer mouse model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Environmental Science & Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79965, United States

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79902, United States

Department of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79965, United States

Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79965, United States

Department of Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79965, United States

Border Biomedical Research Center, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79965, United States

Funding

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services · Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.5114/pg.2018.8000110.5114/pg.2018.80001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.04510.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.045 ↗
3. Drugs Approved for Stomach (Gastric) Cancer - NCI. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/stomach (accessed 2023-01-05).
4. 10.3748/wjg.v9.i11.239010.3748/wjg.v9.i11.2390 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.18010.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.180 ↗
6. Zhang N. · Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. · 2016 · 20 · 3199
7. 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.11.626110.7314/apjcp.2013.14.11.6261 ↗
8. 10.1186/1471-2407-13-58610.1186/1471-2407-13-586 ↗
9. 10.1158/ajc.1936.33410.1158/ajc.1936.334 ↗
10. 10.1186/s12885-020-06869-310.1186/s12885-020-06869-3 ↗
11. 10.1023/A:101191080121210.1023/A:1011910801212 ↗
12. Rajput G. C. · Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Res. · 2010 · 1 · 30
13. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.17417810.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174178 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c0806510.1021/acs.jpcb.1c08065 ↗
15. 10.1111/sji.1283310.1111/sji.12833 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0185510.1021/acs.biomac.6b01855 ↗
17. 10.1039/D2BM00316C10.1039/D2BM00316C ↗
18. 10.32394/rpzh.2019.008210.32394/rpzh.2019.0082 ↗
19. 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.01.0310.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.01.03 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11725810.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117258 ↗
21. 10.3390/biom1305076810.3390/biom13050768 ↗
22. 10.7150/ijbs.1024810.7150/ijbs.10248 ↗
23. 10.3892/ijo.13.6.120310.3892/ijo.13.6.1203 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10120-011-0042-410.1007/s10120-011-0042-4 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.10.00610.1016/j.clcc.2018.10.006 ↗
26. 10.1186/s13046-016-0334-y10.1186/s13046-016-0334-y ↗
27. 10.1007/s10555-023-10099-x10.1007/s10555-023-10099-x ↗
28. 10.1002/cam4.244010.1002/cam4.2440 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00204-014-1448-710.1007/s00204-014-1448-7 ↗
30. 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1122::AID-CNCR1429>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1122::AID-CNCR1429>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
31. 10.1182/blood-2017-05-78568310.1182/blood-2017-05-785683 ↗
32. 10.1042/BSR2021188510.1042/BSR20211885 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0554710.1021/acsnano.7b05547 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2018.10.01210.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2018.10.012 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.2c1301910.1021/acsami.2c13019 ↗
36. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1998.tb00575.x10.1111/j.1349-7006.1998.tb00575.x ↗
37. 10.3390/cancers501009210.3390/cancers5010092 ↗
38. 10.1111/bcpt.1234210.1111/bcpt.12342 ↗
39. 10.3390/fib801000110.3390/fib8010001 ↗
40. 10.1039/C5MD00189G10.1039/C5MD00189G ↗
41. 10.1073/pnas.211269611910.1073/pnas.2112696119 ↗
42. 10.1080/1052029050038784710.1080/10520290500387847 ↗
43. Lazǎr D. · Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. · 2010 · 51 · 655
44. 10.3892/or.6.3.67510.3892/or.6.3.675 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.11128510.1016/j.biopha.2021.111285 ↗
46. 10.3748/wjg.v23.i37.689410.3748/wjg.v23.i37.6894 ↗