Source abstract
Abstract
Due to high volumetric energy density, the major market share of cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries is still dominated by LiCoO 2 (LCO) at a 3C field. However, a number of challenges will be triggered if the charge voltage is increased from 4.2/4.3 to 4.6 V to further increase energy density, such as a violent interface reaction, Co dissolution, and release of lattice oxygen. Here, LCO is coated with the fast ionic conductor Li 1.8 Sc 0.8 Ti 1.2 (PO 4 ) 3 (LSTP) to form LCO@LSTP, while a stable interface of LCO is in situ constructed by the decomposition of LSTP at the LSTP/LCO interface. As decomposition products of LSTP, Ti and Sc elements can be doped into LCO and thus reconstruct the interface from a layered structure to a spinel structure, which improves the stability of the interface. Moreover, Li 3 PO 4 from the decomposition of LSTP and remaining LSTP coating as a fast ionic conductor can improve Li + transport when compared with bare LCO, and thus boost the specific capacity to 185.3 mAh g –1 at 1C. Benefited from the stable interface and fast ion conducting coating, the LCO@LSTP (1 wt %) cathode delivers a high capacity of 202.3 mAh g –1 at the first cycle (0.5C, 3.0–4.6 V), and shows a higher capacity retention of 89.0% than LCO (50.9%) after 100 cycles. Furthermore, the change of the Fermi level obtained by using a kelvin probe force microscope (KPFM) and the oxygen band structure calculated by using density functional theory further illustrate that LSTP supports the performance of LCO. We anticipate that this study can improve the conversion efficiency of energy-storage devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
School of Metallurgy and Environment, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China
Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Battery Materials, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Key Laboratory of Comprehensive and Highly Efficient Utilization of Salt Lake Resources, Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
College of Chemistry, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, United States
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of?Hunan Province