journal article·2023-02-08

Oxidatively Doped Tetrathiafulvalene-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks for High Specific Energy of Supercapatteries

Zhou-Hong Ren, Zhi-Ruo Zhang, Li-Jun Ma, Chen-Yue Luo, Jie Dai, Qin-Yu Zhu

Publisher page

Abstract

Poor electrical conductivity and instability of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have limited their energy storage and conversion efficiency. In this work, we report the application of oxidatively doped tetrathiafulvalene (TTF)-based MOFs for high-performance electrodes in supercapatteries. Two isostructural MOFs, formulated as [M(py-TTF-py)(BPDC)]·2H 2 O (M = Ni II ( 1 ), Zn II ( 2 ); py-TTF-py = 2,6-bis(4′-pyridyl)TTF; H 2 BPDC = biphenyl-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid), are crystallographically characterized. The structural analyses show that the two MOFs possess a three-dimensional 8-fold interpenetrating diamond-like topology, which is the first example for TTF-based dual-ligand MOFs. Upon iodine treatment, MOFs 1 and 2 are converted into oxidatively doped 1-ox and 2-ox with high crystallinity. The electrical conductivity of 1-ox and 2-ox is significantly increased by six∼seven orders of magnitude. Benefiting from the unique structure and the pronounced development of electrical conductivity, the specific capacities reach 833.2 and 828.3 C g –1 at a specific current of 1 A g –1 for 1-ox and 2-ox, respectively. When used as a battery-type positrode to assemble a supercapattery, the AC∥ 1-ox and AC∥ 2-ox (AC = activated carbon) present an energy density of 90.3 and 83.0 Wh kg –1 at a power density of 1.18 kW kg –1 and great cycling stability with 82% of original capacity and 92% columbic efficiency retention after 10,000 cycles. Ex situ characterization illustrates the ligand-dominated mechanism in the charge/discharge processes. The excellent electrochemical performances of 1-ox and 2-ox are rarely reported for supercapatteries, illustrating that the construction of unique highly dense and robust structures of MOFs followed by postsynthetic oxidative doping is an effective approach to fabricate MOF-based electrode materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Organic and Molecular Conductors Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11221310.1016/j.rser.2022.112213 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms1264710.1038/ncomms12647 ↗
3. 10.1007/s40820-020-0413-710.1007/s40820-020-0413-7 ↗
4. 10.1002/celc.20220003610.1002/celc.202200036 ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.1c1096310.1021/jacs.1c10963 ↗
6. 10.1002/smll.20210728410.1002/smll.202107284 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.00710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.007 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20170201410.1002/aenm.201702014 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20180328710.1002/adfm.201803287 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.1c0457210.1021/acsami.1c04572 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0691010.1021/acsnano.9b06910 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.02210.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.022 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12209010.1016/j.cej.2019.122090 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.01910.1016/j.cej.2018.02.019 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.11.01110.1016/j.apmt.2017.11.011 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.01.00410.1016/j.jelechem.2018.01.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.est.2018.04.01410.1016/j.est.2018.04.014 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.03.00310.1016/j.ensm.2020.03.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.21401110.1016/j.ccr.2021.214011 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-019-13051-210.1038/s41467-019-13051-2 ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20210625910.1002/anie.202106259 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.01910.1016/j.joule.2018.09.019 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mattod.2016.10.00310.1016/j.mattod.2016.10.003 ↗
24. 10.1126/sciadv.aap925210.1126/sciadv.aap9252 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0489810.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04898 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.00510.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.005 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20140513910.1002/anie.201405139 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20170289110.1002/adma.201702891 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20150621910.1002/anie.201506219 ↗
30. 10.1021/ja305982710.1021/ja3059827 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja512437u10.1021/ja512437u ↗
32. 10.1021/jacs.6b0934510.1021/jacs.6b09345 ↗
33. 10.1039/C9SC03348C10.1039/C9SC03348C ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20161182410.1002/anie.201611824 ↗
35. 10.1039/C9CC09960C10.1039/C9CC09960C ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-017-02256-y10.1038/s41467-017-02256-y ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b0100010.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b01000 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10973-019-08442-y10.1007/s10973-019-08442-y ↗
39. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.02.01310.1016/j.dyepig.2004.02.013 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.07.02110.1016/j.molstruc.2015.07.021 ↗
41. 10.1002/adfm.20140008310.1002/adfm.201400083 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsami.9b2023410.1021/acsami.9b20234 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp970490q10.1021/jp970490q ↗
44. 10.1021/jp074464w10.1021/jp074464w ↗
45. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0729210.1021/acsnano.0c07292 ↗
46. 10.1039/C6TA09060E10.1039/C6TA09060E ↗