Understanding the Magnetic Microstructure through Experiments and Machine Learning Algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
Advanced machine learning techniques have unfurled their applications in various interdisciplinary areas of research and development. This paper highlights the use of image regression algorithms based on advanced neural networks to understand the magnetic properties directly from the magnetic microstructure. In this study, Co/Pd multilayers have been chosen as a reference material system that displays maze-like magnetic domains in pristine conditions. Irradiation of Ar+ ions with two different energies (50 and 100 keV) at various fluences was used as an external perturbation to investigate the modification of magnetic and structural properties from a state of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy to the vicinity of the spin reorientation transition. Magnetic force microscopy revealed domain fragmentation with a smaller periodicity and weaker magnetic contrast up to the fluence of 1014 ions/cm2. Further increases in the ion fluence result in the formation of feather-like domains with a variation in local magnetization distribution. The experimental results were complemented with micromagnetic simulations, where the variations of effective magnetic anisotropy and exchange constant result in qualitatively similar changes in magnetic domains, as observed experimentally. Importantly, a set of 960 simulated domain images was generated to train, validate, and test the convolutional neural network (CNN) that predicts the magnetic properties directly from the domain images with a high level of accuracy (maximum 93.9%). Our work has immense importance in promoting the applications of image regression methods through the CNN in understanding integral magnetic properties obtained from the microscopic features subject to change under external perturbations.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanomagnetism and Microscopy Laboratory, Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, Sangareddy502285, Telangana, India
Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche, CNR-SPIN c/o Università“G. D’Annunzio”, Chieti66100, Italy
Chemistry Department, University of Turin, Via Pietro Giuria, 7, Torino10125, Italy
Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad500058, India
Funding
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology · H2020 European Research Council
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.489666710.1063/1.4896667 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.145960510.1063/1.1459605 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat280410.1038/nmat2804 ↗
4. Spaldin N. A. · 201010.1017/CBO9780511781599 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.09.04010.1016/j.jmmm.2015.09.040 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1009103410.3390/ma10091034 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.12.06210.1016/j.jmmm.2017.12.062 ↗
8. 10.1103/physrevb.87.18442810.1103/physrevb.87.184428 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.07.09210.1016/j.jmmm.2017.07.092 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.02.05110.1016/j.jmmm.2016.02.051 ↗
11. Knystautas E. · 201810.1201/9781420028294 ↗
12. 10.1103/physrevb.91.01440710.1103/physrevb.91.014407 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.01.07210.1016/j.jmmm.2017.01.072 ↗
14. 10.1038/srep1155110.1038/srep11551 ↗
15. Mateev V. · 2019 · 1
16. 10.1103/physrevd.103.11602310.1103/physrevd.103.116023 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11179010.1016/j.matchar.2022.111790 ↗
18. 10.1209/epl/i2000-00240-x10.1209/epl/i2000-00240-x ↗
19. 10.7566/jpsj.90.01470510.7566/jpsj.90.014705 ↗
20. Matthies, T.; Schäffer, A. F.; Posske, T.; Wiesendanger, R.; Vedmedenko, E. Y.Topological Characterization of Dynamic Chiral Magnetic Textures Using Machine Learning. 2022, arXiv:2201.01629 [cond-mat] type: article.10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.054022 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41598-021-02374-010.1038/s41598-021-02374-0 ↗
22. 10.1002/advs.20200479510.1002/advs.202004795 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.2c0899110.1021/acsami.2c08991 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41524-020-00485-210.1038/s41524-020-00485-2 ↗
25. Ankile, L. L.; Heggland, M. F.; Krange, K.Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Survey of the Foundations, Selected Improvements, and Some Current Applications. 2020, arXiv:2011.12960 [cs] type: article.
26. 10.1126/sciadv.abb087210.1126/sciadv.abb0872 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.475227410.1063/1.4752274 ↗
28. Avasthi D. · Curr. Sci. · 2000 · 78 · 1297
29. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.04.02310.1016/j.jmmm.2010.04.023 ↗
30. 10.1103/physrevb.85.05442710.1103/physrevb.85.054427 ↗
31. 10.1063/5.008817710.1063/5.0088177 ↗
32. 10.1186/1556-276x-9-39510.1186/1556-276x-9-395 ↗
33. 10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/16410.1088/1367-2630/9/6/164 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.486167910.1063/1.4861679 ↗
35. 10.1088/1361-648x/29/5/05500110.1088/1361-648x/29/5/055001 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.145223010.1063/1.1452230 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.190632110.1063/1.1906321 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.488386010.1063/1.4883860 ↗
39. 10.1103/physrevb.86.02441810.1103/physrevb.86.024418 ↗
40. 10.1103/physrevb.92.10410910.1103/physrevb.92.104109 ↗
41. 10.1103/physrevb.94.17442210.1103/physrevb.94.174422 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0067010.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00670 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.2c0726810.1021/acsami.2c07268 ↗
44. 10.1103/physrevmaterials.5.02440510.1103/physrevmaterials.5.024405 ↗
45. 10.1103/physrevlett.124.04720310.1103/physrevlett.124.047203 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15795310.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157953 ↗
47. 10.1007/s00339-022-05361-y10.1007/s00339-022-05361-y ↗
48. 10.1063/1.489918610.1063/1.4899186 ↗
49. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/20/20530210.1088/0957-4484/26/20/205302 ↗
50. Landau L. · 1992 · 5110.1016/B978-0-08-036364-6.50008-9 ↗
51. Gilbert T. L. · Phys. Rev. · 1955 · 100 · 1243
52. Abadi M. · 2015
53. He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Sun, J.Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. 2015, arXiv:1512.03385 [cs] version: 1 type: article.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
54. Simonyan, K.; Zisserman, A.Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. 2015, arXiv:1409.1556 [cs] version: 6 type: article.
55. Huang, G.; Liu, Z.; van der Maaten, L.; Weinberger, K. Q.Densely Connected Convolutional Networks. 2018, arXiv:1608.06993 [cs] version: 5 type: article.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
56. Krizhevsky A. · 2012
57. Tan, M.; Le, Q. V.EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks. 2020, arXiv:1905.11946 [cs, stat] version: 5 type: article.
58. Ioffe, S.; Szegedy, C.Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift. 2015, https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03167.
59. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.04.03510.1016/j.jmmm.2007.04.035 ↗
60. 10.1103/physrevb.99.02443110.1103/physrevb.99.024431 ↗
61. 10.1103/physrevb.98.22440410.1103/physrevb.98.224404 ↗
62. Hubert A. · 2008
63. 10.1063/1.339396010.1063/1.3393960 ↗
64. 10.3390/s1712274310.3390/s17122743 ↗
65. 10.1103/physrevb.80.18441910.1103/physrevb.80.184419 ↗
66. 10.1002/pssa.221142021710.1002/pssa.2211420217 ↗
67. 10.1063/1.490282610.1063/1.4902826 ↗
68. 10.1063/1.489356910.1063/1.4893569 ↗
69. Al-Saffar A. A. M. · 2017 · 2610.1109/ICRAMET.2017.8253139 ↗
70. 10.1186/s40537-021-00444-810.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 ↗