Suppression of Membrane Degradation Accompanied with Increased Output Performance in Fuel Cells by Use of Silica-Containing Anode Catalyst Layers
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Polymer electrolyte membranes (PEMs) for fuel cells are chemically degraded by the attack of ·OH radicals generated from the decomposition of H 2 O 2, which is predominantly produced at the Pt/C hydrogen anode. The incorporation of conventional radical scavengers into the PEM suffers from a decrease in the output performance. We, for the first time, demonstrate that the addition of hygroscopic silica nanoparticles (NPs) to the Pt/C anode catalyst layer provides a remarkably prolonged (ca. 4 times) lifetime of a Nafion membrane in an accelerated stress test and open circuit voltage (OCV) holding at 90 °C, accompanied by improved output ( I–E ) performances at low relative humidity. It has been found that the use of silica NPs decreases H 2 O 2 formation rate from the OCV to a practical H 2 oxidation potential in a half-cell using 0.1 M HClO 4 at 90 °C and provides reduced ohmic resistance (increase in water content) and effective utilization of Pt cathode catalyst in a single cell, by which the improvement of the durability of the PEM and increased output performance are explained rationally.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Clean Energy Research Center, University of Yamanashi, 4 Takeda, Kofu 400-8510, Japan
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Nanomaterials Center, University of Yamanashi, 6-43 Miyamae, Kofu 400-0021, Japan
Funding
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0064410.1021/acsenergylett.6b00644 ↗
2. 10.3390/membranes1111087910.3390/membranes11110879 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-021-25911-x10.1038/s41467-021-25911-x ↗
4. 10.1039/C7SE00038C10.1039/C7SE00038C ↗
5. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0211010.1021/acsomega.0c02110 ↗
6. LaConti A. B. · 2003 · 3 · 647
7. 10.1149/1.298196410.1149/1.2981964 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.298201510.1149/1.2982015 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.03110.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.031 ↗
10. 10.1149/2.0311806jes10.1149/2.0311806jes ↗
11. 10.1002/app.5220810.1002/app.52208 ↗
12. 10.1149/2.1221712jes10.1149/2.1221712jes ↗
13. 10.1149/2.0771902jes10.1149/2.0771902jes ↗
14. 10.1149/1.183730710.1149/1.1837307 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.11.01210.1016/j.electacta.2005.11.012 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.12.00910.1016/j.elecom.2011.12.009 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.10.13410.1016/j.electacta.2012.10.134 ↗
18. 10.3390/catal1112151710.3390/catal11121517 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.02510.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.025 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0325010.1021/acsanm.1c03250 ↗
21. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac4b8610.1149/1945-7111/ac4b86 ↗
22. U.S. DRIVE Fuel Cell Tech. Team Road Map (November 2017), pp 21. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2017/11/f46/FCTT_Roadmap_Nov_2017_FINAL.pdf.
23. 10.1149/1.280679810.1149/1.2806798 ↗
24. 10.1149/05801.0129ecst10.1149/05801.0129ecst ↗
25. 10.1039/C9TA12023H10.1039/C9TA12023H ↗
26. 10.1016/S0022-0728(96)04924-810.1016/S0022-0728(96)04924-8 ↗
27. 10.1021/cr020712310.1021/cr0207123 ↗
28. 10.1039/C7CY01700F10.1039/C7CY01700F ↗
29. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2006.01.04310.1016/j.molstruc.2006.01.043 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.07110.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.071 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.02.09910.1016/j.electacta.2009.02.099 ↗
32. 10.1021/es203612d10.1021/es203612d ↗
33. 10.1021/es300210310.1021/es3002103 ↗
34. 10.1016/0022-0728(90)85006-Q10.1016/0022-0728(90)85006-Q ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.11710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.117 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13403510.1016/j.cej.2021.134035 ↗