journal article·2022-12-28

Starch Janus Particles: Bulk Synthesis, Self-Assembly, Rheology, and Potential Food Applications

Arkaye Kierulf, Mojtaba Enayati, Mohammad Yaghoobi, Judith Whaley, James Smoot, Mariana Perez Herrera, Alireza Abbaspourrad

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 51
Publisher page

Abstract

Although incredible progress in the field of Janus particles over the last three decades has delivered many promising smart-material prototypes, from cancer-targeting drug delivery vehicles to self-motile nanobots, their real-world applications have been somewhat tempered by concerns over scalability and sustainability. In this study, we adapt a simple, scalable 3D mask method to synthesize Janus particles in bulk using starch as the base material: a natural biopolymer that is safe, biocompatible, biodegradable, cheap, widely available, and versatile. Using this method, starch granules are first embedded on a wax droplet such that half of the starch is covered; then, the uncovered half is treated with octenyl succinic anhydride, after which the wax coating is removed. Janus particles with 49% Janus balance can be produced in this way and were observed to self-assemble into wormlike strings in water due to their hydrophobic/hydrophilic nature. Our Janus starch granules outperform the non-Janus controls as thickening and gelling agents: they exhibit a fourfold increase in water-holding capacity, a 30% lower critical caking concentration, and a viscosity greater by orders of magnitude. They also form gels that are much firmer and more stable. Starch Janus particles with these functional properties can be used as novel, lower-calorie, highly efficient, plant-based super-thickeners in the food industry, potentially reducing starch use in food by 55%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Proteins in Food Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, 243 Stocking Hall, Ithaca, New York14853, United States

Tate & Lyle Solutions USA LLC, 5450 Prairie Stone Pkwy, Hoffman Estates, Illinois60192, United States

Funding

Tate & Lyle Solutions LLC

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Modified Starch Market. https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/modified-starch-market (accessed Nov 14, 2022).
2. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.10692010.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106920 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00396-020-04601-y10.1007/s00396-020-04601-y ↗
4. 10.1103/revmodphys.64.64510.1103/revmodphys.64.645 ↗
5. 10.1039/c2jm31740k10.1039/c2jm31740k ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20130541510.1002/adma.201305415 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0112310.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01123 ↗
8. 10.1021/cr300089t10.1021/cr300089t ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20151040910.1002/anie.201510409 ↗
10. 10.1021/la962106710.1021/la9621067 ↗
11. 10.1021/la904701r10.1021/la904701r ↗
12. 10.1021/ja200139w10.1021/ja200139w ↗
13. 10.1021/ja305903u10.1021/ja305903u ↗
14. 10.1021/la062716z10.1021/la062716z ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cis.2020.10223410.1016/j.cis.2020.102234 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.10003310.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100033 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.00610.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.006 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20200415310.1002/adfm.202004153 ↗
19. 10.1021/bm300159u10.1021/bm300159u ↗
20. 10.1039/b907478c10.1039/b907478c ↗
21. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.01.03710.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.01.037 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.2c0473810.1021/acsami.2c04738 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.2c0909110.1021/acsami.2c09091 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.12624610.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126246 ↗
25. 10.1002/pola.2904910.1002/pola.29049 ↗
26. 10.1039/c8gc02662a10.1039/c8gc02662a ↗
27. 10.1002/food.20039001510.1002/food.200390015 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.08910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.089 ↗
29. 10.1002/star.20090023510.1002/star.200900235 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.09.00310.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.09.003 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.10997410.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.109974 ↗
32. 10.1094/cchem-05-15-0107-r10.1094/cchem-05-15-0107-r ↗
33. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.04.02510.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.04.025 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.07.02910.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.07.029 ↗
35. Official Methods of Analysis, 2019, 21st ed. AOAC International. https://www.aoac.org/official-methods-of-analysis-21st-edition-2019/ (accessed Nov 14, 2022).
36. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.01910.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.019 ↗
37. 10.1021/jf503506410.1021/jf5035064 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.04310.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.043 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.09610.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.096 ↗
40. 10.1080/10942912.2013.86016810.1080/10942912.2013.860168 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.11.01110.1016/j.carbpol.2006.11.011 ↗
42. 10.1039/c2sm25397f10.1039/c2sm25397f ↗
43. 10.1126/science.119745110.1126/science.1197451 ↗
44. 10.1007/bf0108838210.1007/bf01088382 ↗
45. McClements, D. J. Food Emulsions: Principles, Practices, and Techniques, 3rd ed. CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2015; pp 294-295.10.1201/b18868 ↗
46. 10.1016/s0927-7757(00)00551-310.1016/s0927-7757(00)00551-3 ↗
47. 10.1002/fsn3.1710.1002/fsn3.17 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.23010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.230 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0006910.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00069 ↗
50. 10.1039/c2sm07230k10.1039/c2sm07230k ↗
51. 10.1039/c3sm50239b10.1039/c3sm50239b ↗
52. 10.1063/5.000332910.1063/5.0003329 ↗
53. 10.1021/ja508733r10.1021/ja508733r ↗
54. 10.1039/c5ta09850e10.1039/c5ta09850e ↗
55. 10.1021/acsami.6b0124510.1021/acsami.6b01245 ↗
56. 10.1039/c2sm00005a10.1039/c2sm00005a ↗