Electroless Dealloying of Thin-Film Nanocrystalline Au–Ag Alloys: Mechanisms of Ligament Nucleation and Sources of Its Synthesis Variability
Source abstract
Abstract
Control of ligament size in nanoporous gold through process inputs in chemical dealloying holds the potential to exploit its size dependent properties in applications in energy and biomedicine. While its morphology evolution is regulated by the kinetics of coarsening, recent studies are focused on the early stage of dealloying (e.g., ∼ 5–42 at. % in residual alloy content) to understand mechanisms of ligament nucleation and its role in altering process–structure relationships. This paper examines this stage in chemical dealloying of nanocrystalline Au49Ag51 thin films and finds that ligaments are nucleated uniformly through its thickness due to the dealloying front rapidly propagating through the thickness of the film. Further, through the establishment of process–structure relationships with large data sets (i.e., 80 samples), this paper quantifies sources of variability that alter the kinetics of ligament growth such as aging of the precursor (e.g., grain growth) and solution evaporation. It is found that ligament diameter is better predicted by the residual silver content rather than by the dealloying time even amidst both effects and independent control of ligament diameter and solid area fraction is demonstrated within a limited window.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoporous metals and alloys · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Arizona State University − The Polytechnic School -6075 S. Innovation Way West, Meza Arizona 85212, United States
Applied Plasmonics Laboratory, Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics, 6, P. Brovki str., 220013, Minsk, Belarus
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03173910.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031739 ↗
2. 10.1126/sciadv.aas945910.1126/sciadv.aas9459 ↗
3. 10.3934/matersci.2018.6.114110.3934/matersci.2018.6.1141 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.182042011610.1073/pnas.1820420116 ↗
5. 10.1021/la062313z10.1021/la062313z ↗
6. 10.1038/srep4413910.1038/srep44139 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0204810.1021/acsnano.7b02048 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab9cf410.1088/1361-6528/ab9cf4 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.08.06910.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.08.069 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat433510.1038/nmat4335 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat233510.1038/nmat2335 ↗
12. 10.1039/c0cp00757a10.1039/c0cp00757a ↗
13. 10.1038/ncomms523710.1038/ncomms5237 ↗
14. 10.1039/C4NR05778C10.1039/C4NR05778C ↗
15. 10.1557/mrs.2017.30010.1557/mrs.2017.300 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.272219910.1063/1.2722199 ↗
17. 10.1038/srep0011210.1038/srep00112 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20060248410.1002/anie.200602484 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0157010.1021/acsaem.8b01570 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.10410.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.104 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.09.01610.1016/j.jcat.2007.09.016 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.02510.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.025 ↗
23. 10.1002/fuce.20080007510.1002/fuce.200800075 ↗
24. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab64c010.1149/1945-7111/ab64c0 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.116810.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1168 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.04610.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.046 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.149228810.1149/1.1492288 ↗
28. 10.3390/ma1317370610.3390/ma13173706 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41598-018-25122-310.1038/s41598-018-25122-3 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.01210.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.012 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.169965810.1063/1.1699658 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.0c2016310.1021/acsami.0c20163 ↗
33. 10.1039/C6RA28423J10.1039/C6RA28423J ↗
34. 10.1021/am506581610.1021/am5065816 ↗
35. 10.1115/MSEC2021-6039010.1115/MSEC2021-60390 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.06510.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.065 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.03910.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.039 ↗
38. 10.1039/B919313H10.1039/B919313H ↗
39. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.12522010.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125220 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20070276010.1002/adma.200702760 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.08.01010.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.08.010 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.23910.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.239 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.10913910.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109139 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.22550410.1103/PhysRevLett.106.225504 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41563-018-0162-x10.1038/s41563-018-0162-x ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.25410.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.254 ↗
47. Niauzorau, S.; Ferreira, P.; Azeredo, B. Synthesis of Porous Noble Metal Films with Tunable Porosity by Timed Dealloying. In ASME 2018 13th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, June 18–22, 2018. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, MSEC 2018 4; American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2018.10.1115/MSEC2018-6665 ↗
48. 10.1002/pssr.20190037610.1002/pssr.201900376 ↗
49. 10.1080/14786435.2013.87611310.1080/14786435.2013.876113 ↗
50. 10.1039/C7NR04004K10.1039/C7NR04004K ↗
51. 10.3390/ma204218810.3390/ma2042188 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.22550310.1103/PhysRevLett.108.225503 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.283835110.1063/1.2838351 ↗
54. 10.1080/21663831.2016.127648510.1080/21663831.2016.1276485 ↗
55. 10.1149/2.0131412jes10.1149/2.0131412jes ↗
56. 10.1149/2.1341811jes10.1149/2.1341811jes ↗
57. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.01710.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.017 ↗
58. 10.1093/clinchem/21.13.190710.1093/clinchem/21.13.1907 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.277375710.1063/1.2773757 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.488227510.1063/1.4882275 ↗
61. 10.1039/C7RA12915G10.1039/C7RA12915G ↗
62. 10.1038/s41467-021-23598-810.1038/s41467-021-23598-8 ↗
63. 10.1002/adma.20040079210.1002/adma.200400792 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.08910.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.089 ↗
65. 10.1149/2.1681704jes10.1149/2.1681704jes ↗
66. Martina I. · e-Preservation Sci. · 2012 · 9 · 1
67. 10.1149/1.290972410.1149/1.2909724 ↗
68. 10.1021/jp056940t10.1021/jp056940t ↗
69. 10.1116/1.501179010.1116/1.5011790 ↗
70. 10.6084/m9.figshare.16747885.v110.6084/m9.figshare.16747885.v1 ↗