journal article·2022-01-12Open access

Effective Ultrasound Acoustic Measurement to Monitor the Lithium-Ion Battery Electrode Drying Process with Various Coating Thicknesses

Ye Shui Zhang, James B. Robinson, Rhodri E. Owen, Anand N. P. Radhakrishnan, Juntao Li, Jude O. Majasan, Paul R. Shearing, Emma Kendrick, Dan J. L. Brett

Abstract

The electrode drying process (DP) is a crucial step in the lithium-ion battery manufacturing chain and plays a fundamental role in governing the performance of the cells. The DP is extremely complex, with the dynamics and their implication in the production of electrodes generally being poorly understood. To date, there is limited discussion of these processes in the literature due to the limitation of the existing in situ metrology. Here, ultrasound acoustic measurements are demonstrated as a promising tool to monitor the physical evolution of the electrode coating in situ. These observations are validated by gravimetric analysis to show the feasibility of the technique to monitor the DP and identify the three different drying stages. A possible application of this technique is to adjust the drying rates based upon the ultrasound readings at different drying stages and to speed up the drying time. These findings prove that this measurement can be used as a cost-effective and simple tool to provide characteristic diagnostics of the electrode, which can be applied in large-scale coating manufacturing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography · Wireless Power Transfer Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, U.K.

The Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0RA, U.K.

School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, U.K.

School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.

Funding

Royal Academy of Engineering · Faraday Institution

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. GVR. Lithium-ion Battery Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Product (LCO, LFP, NCA, LMO, LTO, Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt), by Application, by Region, and Segment Forecasts, 2020–2027; Grand View Research, 2020.
2. 10.1149/2.107112jes10.1149/2.107112jes ↗
3. 10.1021/la401368510.1021/la4013685 ↗
4. 10.1080/07373937.2015.106049710.1080/07373937.2015.1060497 ↗
5. 10.1149/06422.0057ecst10.1149/06422.0057ecst ↗
6. 10.1007/s11998-013-9509-z10.1007/s11998-013-9509-z ↗
7. 10.1080/07373937.2016.124897510.1080/07373937.2016.1248975 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.06310.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.063 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.11710.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.117 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.018 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.05110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.051 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.10210.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.102 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.00710.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.007 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20210223310.1002/aenm.202102233 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41560-018-0130-310.1038/s41560-018-0130-3 ↗
16. 10.1002/cite.20130008510.1002/cite.201300085 ↗
17. Günther, T.; Billot, N.; Schuster, J.; Schnell, J.; Spingler, F. B.; Gasteiger, H. A. In the Manufacturing of Electrodes: Key Process for the Future Success of Lithium-Ion Batteries, Advanced Materials Research; Trans Tech Publications, 2016, pp 304–311.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1140.304 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.01610.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.016 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.06110.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.061 ↗
21. 10.1039/c2jm32659k10.1039/c2jm32659k ↗
22. 10.1149/2.1271707jes10.1149/2.1271707jes ↗
23. 10.1021/la800050u10.1021/la800050u ↗
24. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.07.02310.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.07.023 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.03.05410.1016/j.jcis.2011.03.054 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.est.2019.10086210.1016/j.est.2019.100862 ↗
27. 10.1038/pj.2015.3610.1038/pj.2015.36 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.12.01210.1016/j.solmat.2008.12.012 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b0087810.1021/acs.iecr.5b00878 ↗
30. 10.1149/2.1171702jes10.1149/2.1171702jes ↗
31. 10.1088/2515-7655/abfb4a10.1088/2515-7655/abfb4a ↗
32. 10.1039/c5ee00111k10.1039/c5ee00111k ↗
33. 10.1149/2.1411712jes10.1149/2.1411712jes ↗
34. 10.1039/c8cp07098a10.1039/c8cp07098a ↗
35. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.01410.1016/j.joule.2020.07.014 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.1c1047210.1021/acsami.1c10472 ↗
37. Kendrick E. · 2019 · 26210.1039/9781788016124-00262 ↗
38. 10.1080/07373937.2017.131985510.1080/07373937.2017.1319855 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11837-017-2404-910.1007/s11837-017-2404-9 ↗
40. Tsotsas E. · 200710.1002/9783527631629 ↗
41. 10.1007/bf0103652310.1007/bf01036523 ↗
42. 10.1080/0262666570949306210.1080/02626665709493062 ↗
43. Siqveland L. M. · 202110.46690/capi.2021.02.01 ↗