journal article·2024-06-05

Protein Adsorption on Solid Surfaces: Data Mining, Database, Molecular Surface-Derived Properties, and Semiempirical Relationships

Matthew Cho, Zahra Mahmoodi, Prasad Shetty, Lauren R. Harrison, Maru Arias Montecillo, Ayyappasamy Sudalaiyadum Perumal, Gerardin Solana, Dan V. Nicolau, Dan V. Nicolau

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Protein adsorption on solid surfaces is a process relevant to biological, medical, industrial, and environmental applications. Despite this wide interest and advancement in measurement techniques, the complexity of protein adsorption has frustrated its accurate prediction. To address this challenge, here, data regarding protein adsorption reported in the last four decades was collected, checked for completeness and correctness, organized, and archived in an upgraded, freely accessible Biomolecular Adsorption Database, which is equivalent to a large-scale, ad hoc, crowd-sourced multifactorial experiment. The shape and physicochemical properties of the proteins present in the database were quantified on their molecular surfaces using an in-house program (ProMS) operating as an add-on to the PyMol software. Machine learning-based analysis indicated that protein adsorption on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces is modulated by different sets of operational, structural, and molecular surface-based physicochemical parameters. Separately, the adsorption data regarding four "benchmark" proteins, i.e., lysozyme, albumin, IgG, and fibrinogen, was processed by piecewise linear regression with the protein monolayer acting as breakpoint, using the linearization of the Langmuir isotherm formalism, resulting in semiempirical relationships predicting protein adsorption. These relationships, derived separately for hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces, described well the protein concentration on the surface as a function of the protein concentration in solution, adsorbing surface contact angle, ionic strength, pH, and temperature of the carrying fluid, and the difference between pH and the isoelectric point of the protein. When applying the semiempirical relationships derived for benchmark proteins to two other "test" proteins with known PDB structure, i.e., β-lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin, the errors of this extrapolation were found to be in a linear relationship with the dissimilarity between the benchmark and the test proteins. The work presented here can be used for the estimation of operational parameters modulating protein adsorption for various applications such as diagnostic devices, pharmaceuticals, biomaterials, or the food industry.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Protein purification and stability · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C3, Canada

Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia

Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, U.K.

Funding

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nrm178410.1038/nrm1784 ↗
2. 10.3389/fcimb.2014.0017110.3389/fcimb.2014.00171 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.04.02810.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.04.028 ↗
4. 10.1111/aor.1327410.1111/aor.13274 ↗
5. 10.1517/17425247.2011.57706210.1517/17425247.2011.577062 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0022-1759(99)00051-410.1016/S0022-1759(99)00051-4 ↗
7. 10.1021/ac049427510.1021/ac0494275 ↗
8. 10.1039/b813475h10.1039/b813475h ↗
9. 10.1023/A:102571232632110.1023/A:1025712326321 ↗
10. Weiner H. · 2005 · 27910.1007/3-540-26578-3_14 ↗
11. 10.2217/nnm-2017-017810.2217/nnm-2017-0178 ↗
12. 10.2217/nnm.15.18810.2217/nnm.15.188 ↗
13. 10.1186/s12951-015-0114-410.1186/s12951-015-0114-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.11075610.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110756 ↗
15. 10.1039/D0RA09432C10.1039/D0RA09432C ↗
16. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.11099210.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110992 ↗
17. 10.1093/protein/7.9.105910.1093/protein/7.9.1059 ↗
18. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac5e6c10.1088/1361-6528/ac5e6c ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cocis.2018.11.00410.1016/j.cocis.2018.11.004 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0226010.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02260 ↗
21. 10.1093/nar/28.1.23510.1093/nar/28.1.235 ↗
22. 10.1073/pnas.85.8.244410.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 ↗
23. 10.1371/journal.pone.011404210.1371/journal.pone.0114042 ↗
24. 10.1371/journal.pone.005889610.1371/journal.pone.0058896 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.687917010.1126/science.6879170 ↗
26. 10.1016/0263-7855(93)87010-310.1016/0263-7855(93)87010-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0304-4157(98)00021-510.1016/S0304-4157(98)00021-5 ↗
28. 2021
29. 10.1016/0032-5910(96)03106-310.1016/0032-5910(96)03106-3 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00069-210.1016/S0927-7757(99)00069-2 ↗
31. Beynon R. · 2003
32. 10.1038/srep1255010.1038/srep12550 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.micron.2005.03.00710.1016/j.micron.2005.03.007 ↗
34. Horbett T. A. · 1987 · 343 · 110.1021/bk-1987-0343.ch001 ↗
35. Horbett, T. A.; Brash, J. L. Proteins at Interfaces II: Fundamentals and Applications. ACS Symposium Series No. 602, 1995.10.1021/bk-1995-0602 ↗
36. 10.1021/bk-2012-1120.ch00110.1021/bk-2012-1120.ch001 ↗
37. 10.1007/s12274-020-2735-710.1007/s12274-020-2735-7 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.08.06110.1016/j.bios.2016.08.061 ↗
39. 10.1126/sciadv.abm089810.1126/sciadv.abm0898 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.impact.2020.10020710.1016/j.impact.2020.100207 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0100810.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01008 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41598-018-36597-510.1038/s41598-018-36597-5 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.1c0064210.1021/acsami.1c00642 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12987210.1016/j.cej.2021.129872 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.01210.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.012 ↗
46. 10.3389/fbioe.2018.0006010.3389/fbioe.2018.00060 ↗
47. 10.1557/s43577-022-00417-z10.1557/s43577-022-00417-z ↗
48. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2012.02.00110.1016/j.progsurf.2012.02.001 ↗
49. 10.1098/rsfs.2012.001210.1098/rsfs.2012.0012 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cis.2010.12.00710.1016/j.cis.2010.12.007 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cocis.2018.12.00410.1016/j.cocis.2018.12.004 ↗
52. 10.5301/JABB.2010.609310.5301/JABB.2010.6093 ↗
53. 10.1039/C9NR10009A10.1039/C9NR10009A ↗
54. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.06.05010.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.06.050 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.12.00610.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.12.006 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.02210.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.022 ↗
57. 10.1073/pnas.100234710710.1073/pnas.1002347107 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.02.04110.1016/j.chroma.2007.02.041 ↗
59. 10.1002/elsc.20130009010.1002/elsc.201300090 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.snb.2011.10.02210.1016/j.snb.2011.10.022 ↗
61. 10.1006/abio.2000.489410.1006/abio.2000.4894 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.03010.1016/j.cej.2013.11.030 ↗
63. 10.1002/ceat.20080008210.1002/ceat.200800082 ↗
64. 10.1002/jssc.20200118810.1002/jssc.202001188 ↗
65. 10.1007/s10930-011-9384-310.1007/s10930-011-9384-3 ↗
66. 10.1002/adma.20080205710.1002/adma.200802057 ↗
67. 10.1002/jbm.a.3523510.1002/jbm.a.35235 ↗
68. 10.1088/0953-8984/18/18/S0110.1088/0953-8984/18/18/S01 ↗
69. Eibl R. · 201910.1002/9781119477891 ↗