journal article·2022-03-09Open access

Improved Polymer Hemocompatibility for Blood-Contacting Applications via S-Nitrosoglutathione Impregnation

Lauren Griffin, Megan Douglass, Marcus Goudie, Sean P. Hopkins, Chad Schmiedt, Hitesh Handa

Abstract

Blood-contacting medical devices (BCMDs) are inevitably challenged by thrombi formation, leading to occlusion of flow and device failure. Ideal BCMDs seek to mimic the intrinsic antithrombotic properties of the human vasculature to locally prevent thrombotic complications, negating the need for systemic anticoagulation. An emerging category of BCMD technology utilizes nitric oxide (NO) as a hemocompatible agent, as the vasculature’s endothelial layer naturally releases NO to inhibit platelet activation and consumption. In this paper, we report for the first time the novel impregnation of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) into polymeric poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) tubing via an optimized solvent-swelling method. Material testing revealed an optimized GSNO–PVC material that had adequate GSNO loading to achieve NO flux values within the physiological endothelial NO flux range for a 4 h period. Through in vitro hemocompatibility testing, the optimized material was deemed nonhemolytic (hemolytic index <2%) and capable of reducing platelet activation, suggesting that the material is suitable for contact with whole blood. Furthermore, an in vivo 4 h extracorporeal circulation (ECC) rabbit thrombogenicity model confirmed the blood biocompatibility of the optimized GSNO–PVC. Platelet count remained near 100% for the novel GSNO-impregnated PVC loops (1 h, 91.08 ± 6.27%; 2 h, 95.68 ± 0.61%; 3 h, 97.56 ± 8.59%; 4 h, 95.11 ± 8.30%). In contrast, unmodified PVC ECC loops occluded shortly after the 2 h time point and viable platelet counts quickly diminished (1 h, 85.67 ± 12.62%; 2 h, 54.46 ± 10.53%; 3 h, n/a; 4 h, n/a). The blood clots for GSNO–PVC loops (190.73 ± 72.46 mg) compared to those of unmodified PVC loops (866.50 ± 197.98 mg) were significantly smaller (p < 0.01). The results presented in this paper recommend further investigation in long-term animal models and suggest that GSNO–PVC has the potential to serve as an alternative to systemic anticoagulation in BCMD applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices · Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments · Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, 220 Riverbend Road, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States

Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, 220 Riverbend Road, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States

Department of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, 220 Riverbend Road, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States

Funding

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/jth.1296110.1111/jth.12961 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.02110.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.021 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.blre.2016.07.00310.1016/j.blre.2016.07.003 ↗
4. 10.4103/0019-5049.14464310.4103/0019-5049.144643 ↗
5. 10.1056/NEJMcp05296710.1056/NEJMcp052967 ↗
6. 10.1161/01.CIR.103.24.299410.1161/01.CIR.103.24.2994 ↗
7. 10.1097/PCC.000000000000031710.1097/PCC.0000000000000317 ↗
8. 10.1111/jth.1296310.1111/jth.12963 ↗
9. 10.1055/s-0037-161460710.1055/s-0037-1614607 ↗
10. 10.1152/ajpheart.1998.274.6.H216310.1152/ajpheart.1998.274.6.H2163 ↗
11. 10.3389/fchem.2019.0053010.3389/fchem.2019.00530 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.07.01710.1016/j.micromeso.2013.07.017 ↗
13. 10.1111/bcpt.1258810.1111/bcpt.12588 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.02510.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.025 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.06310.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.063 ↗
16. 10.1039/C3TB21771J10.1039/C3TB21771J ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.036 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.8b0864710.1021/acsami.8b08647 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsabm.9b0023710.1021/acsabm.9b00237 ↗
20. 10.1021/am402112y10.1021/am402112y ↗
21. 10.1021/ar980043910.1021/ar9800439 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.niox.2019.08.00210.1016/j.niox.2019.08.002 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.bsbt.2015.08.00210.1016/j.bsbt.2015.08.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.028 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.036 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.04110.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.041 ↗
27. 10.1039/c3tb20277a10.1039/c3tb20277a ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.1c0133010.1021/acsami.1c01330 ↗
29. 10.3389/fmed.2018.0032110.3389/fmed.2018.00321 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsabm.9b0092410.1021/acsabm.9b00924 ↗
31. 10.1097/MAT.000000000000125610.1097/MAT.0000000000001256 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.00610.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.006 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsabm.9b0059310.1021/acsabm.9b00593 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0132010.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01320 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.9b1061010.1021/acsami.9b10610 ↗
36. 10.1039/C6BM00948D10.1039/C6BM00948D ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.02.00410.1016/j.bbagen.2013.02.004 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0073710.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00737 ↗
39. 10.1016/0142-9612(81)90042-910.1016/0142-9612(81)90042-9 ↗
40. Zingg W. · Can. J. Surg. · 1982 · 25 · 16
41. 10.1039/C9BM00469F10.1039/C9BM00469F ↗
42. 10.1039/c3ra45521a10.1039/c3ra45521a ↗
43. 10.1016/S0006-291X(87)80299-110.1016/S0006-291X(87)80299-1 ↗
44. 10.1073/pnas.85.8.280010.1073/pnas.85.8.2800 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.9b2227710.1021/acsami.9b22277 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41598-017-14012-910.1038/s41598-017-14012-9 ↗
47. 10.1021/jm960616s10.1021/jm960616s ↗