journal article·2021-09-15

N-Acetyl-l-cysteine-Loaded Nanosystems as a Promising Therapeutic Approach Toward the Eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms

Rita M. Pinto, Claudia Monteiro, Sofia A. Costa Lima, Susana Casal, Patrick Van Dijck, M. Cristina L. Martins, Cláudia Nunes, Salette Reis

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 36
Publisher page

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are a major health concern, mainly due to their contribution to increased bacterial resistance to well-known antibiotics. The conventional treatment of biofilms represents a challenge, and frequently, eradication is not achieved with long-lasting administration of antibiotics. In this context, the present work proposes an innovative therapeutic approach that is focused on the encapsulation of N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) into lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) functionalized with d-amino acids to target and disrupt bacterial biofilms. The optimized formulations presented a mean hydrodynamic diameter around 200 nm, a low polydispersity index, and a high loading capacity. These formulations were stable under storage conditions up to 6 months. In vitro biocompatibility studies showed a low cytotoxicity effect in fibroblasts and a low hemolytic activity in human red blood cells. Nevertheless, unloaded LNPs showed a higher hemolytic potential than NAC-loaded LNPs, which suggests a safer profile of the latter. The in vitro antibiofilm efficacy of the developed formulations was tested against Staphylococcus epidermidis (Gram-positive) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Gram-negative) mature biofilms. The results showed that the NAC-loaded LNPs were ineffective against S. epidermidis biofilms, while a significant reduction of biofilm biomass and bacterial viability in P. aeruginosa biofilms were observed. In a more complex therapeutic approach, the LNPs were further combined with moxifloxacin, revealing a beneficial effect between the LNPs and the antibiotic against P. aeruginosa biofilms. Both alone and in combination with moxifloxacin, unloaded and NAC-loaded LNPs functionalized with d-amino acids showed a great potential to reduce bacterial viability, with no significant differences in the presence or absence of NAC. However, the presence of NAC in NAC-loaded functionalized LNPs shows a safer profile than the unloaded LNPs, which is beneficial for an in vivo application. Overall, the developed formulations present a potential therapeutic approach against P. aeruginosa biofilms, alone or in combination with antibiotics.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities · Antimicrobial agents and applications · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

LAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto 4050-313, Portugal

Laboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute of Botany and Microbiology KU Leuven, Leuven 3001, Belgium

VIB KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven 3001, Belgium

i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde INEB, Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto, Porto 4200-135, Portugal

Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto 4050-313, Portugal

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek · Universidade do Porto · Laborat??rio Associado para a Qu??mica Verde · Funda????o para a Ci??ncia e a Tecnologia

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1093/femsre/fuz02110.1093/femsre/fuz021 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.04.01610.1016/j.bbagen.2013.04.016 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.eimc.2012.11.01110.1016/j.eimc.2012.11.011 ↗
4. 10.1186/1471-2180-10-14010.1186/1471-2180-10-140 ↗
5. 10.1016/s0924-8579(03)00232-210.1016/s0924-8579(03)00232-2 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.06.01510.1016/j.rmed.2016.06.015 ↗
7. 10.1128/aem.69.8.4814-4822.200310.1128/aem.69.8.4814-4822.2003 ↗
8. 10.1080/0892701031000161205410.1080/08927010310001612054 ↗
9. Nafee N. · 2015 · 16710.1016/B978-0-12-801317-5.00011-6 ↗
10. 10.1155/2012/75089110.1155/2012/750891 ↗
11. 10.2217/nnm.11.1910.2217/nnm.11.19 ↗
12. 10.1210/en.2009-108210.1210/en.2009-1082 ↗
13. 10.1128/jb.05534-1110.1128/jb.05534-11 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.118862810.1126/science.1188628 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41598-019-39997-310.1038/s41598-019-39997-3 ↗
16. 10.1128/aac.00500-0810.1128/aac.00500-08 ↗
17. 10.1517/17425247.2011.60512010.1517/17425247.2011.605120 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.01110.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.01910.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019 ↗
20. 10.1016/s0169-7439(98)00065-310.1016/s0169-7439(98)00065-3 ↗
21. 10.3390/antibiotics902005910.3390/antibiotics9020059 ↗
22. 10.1038/ncomms1328610.1038/ncomms13286 ↗
23. Scholar E. · 2007 · 1
24. 10.1007/s11095-015-1788-x10.1007/s11095-015-1788-x ↗
25. 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-13462310.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134623 ↗
26. INFARMED─National Authority of Medicines and Health Products, I.P Portuguese Pharmacopoeia 9.0. Health; Imprensa Nacional: Lisbon, 2008; pp 1380–1381.
27. Standardization, I. O. F Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices–Part 5: Tests for in Vitro Cytotoxicity; International Standard ISO 10993-5: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
28. 10.1021/acsami.7b0277510.1021/acsami.7b02775 ↗
29. 10.1038/nprot.2007.52110.1038/nprot.2007.521 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.bioflm.2019.10001010.1016/j.bioflm.2019.100010 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.06.02210.1016/j.xphs.2016.06.022 ↗
32. 10.4161/rna.1968210.4161/rna.19682 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.06.04410.1016/j.carbon.2018.06.044 ↗
34. 10.1038/nbt.333010.1038/nbt.3330 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.12.00410.1016/j.yexmp.2008.12.004 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.05710.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.057 ↗
37. 10.1002/jps.2062710.1002/jps.20627 ↗
38. 10.1007/978-1-60327-198-1_2310.1007/978-1-60327-198-1_23 ↗
39. 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00508-010.1016/s0196-0644(03)00508-0 ↗
40. 10.1039/c6ra27242h10.1039/c6ra27242h ↗
41. 10.1371/journal.pone.012093710.1371/journal.pone.0120937 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.08.00310.1016/j.mimet.2017.08.003 ↗
43. 10.1371/journal.pone.013180610.1371/journal.pone.0131806 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.06110.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.061 ↗
45. 10.1155/2018/941392510.1155/2018/9413925 ↗