Ion and Proton Transport In Aqueous/Nonaqueous Acidic Ionic Liquids for Fuel-Cell Applications—Insight from High-Pressure Dielectric Studies
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of acidic ionic liquids and solids as electrolytes in fuel cells is an emerging field due to their efficient proton conductivity and good thermal stability. Despite multiple reports describing conducting properties of acidic ILs, little is known on the charge-transport mechanism in the vicinity of liquid-glass transition and the structural factors governing the proton hopping. To address these issues, we studied two acidic imidazolium-based ILs with the same cation, however, different anions-bulk tosylate vs small methanesulfonate. High-pressure dielectric studies of anhydrous and water-saturated materials performed in the close vicinity of Tg have revealed significant differences in the charge-transport mechanism in these two systems being undetectable at ambient conditions. Thereby, we demonstrated the effect of molecular architecture on proton hopping, being crucial in the potential electrochemical applications of acidic ILs.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ionic liquids properties and applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics, the University of Silesia in Katowice, Silesian Center for Education and Interdisciplinary Research, 75 Pulku Piechoty 1A, 41−500 Chorzow, Poland
Institute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, 14469 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
Funding
Narodowe Centrum Nauki · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat244810.1038/nmat2448 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0015810.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00158 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0077610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00776 ↗
4. Bruce D. W. · 201110.1002/9780470977798 ↗
5. 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.510.1038/natrevmats.2015.5 ↗
6. 10.1038/nchem.132910.1038/nchem.1329 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.109028710.1126/science.1090287 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0076010.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00760 ↗
9. 10.1021/cm950192a10.1021/cm950192a ↗
10. 10.1021/ja035783d10.1021/ja035783d ↗
11. 10.1088/0953-8984/27/7/07320210.1088/0953-8984/27/7/073202 ↗
12. 10.1021/am404645c10.1021/am404645c ↗
13. 10.1021/ja510345810.1021/ja5103458 ↗
14. Ohno H. · 200510.1002/0471762512 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0165810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01658 ↗
16. Wojnarowska Z. · 2016
17. 10.1021/ar200180910.1021/ar2001809 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b0127410.1021/acs.jpcb.9b01274 ↗
19. 10.1021/ma500347910.1021/ma5003479 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11224-009-9448-610.1007/s11224-009-9448-6 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0281410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02814 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.15510.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.155 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11818810.1016/j.memsci.2020.118188 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.22570310.1103/PhysRevLett.111.225703 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b0337910.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03379 ↗
26. Kremer F. · 200310.1007/978-3-642-56120-7 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.07.08910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.07.089 ↗
28. 10.1021/jp502870q10.1021/jp502870q ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.01570110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.015701 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0071410.1021/acs.macromol.6b00714 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b0856710.1021/acs.jpcb.6b08567 ↗
32. Paluch M. · 201610.1007/978-3-319-32489-0 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0076310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00763 ↗
34. 10.1039/C3SM53202J10.1039/C3SM53202J ↗
35. 10.1088/0034-4885/68/6/R0310.1088/0034-4885/68/6/R03 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598-017-07136-510.1038/s41598-017-07136-5 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.06.00610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.06.006 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.01220110.1103/PhysRevB.77.012201 ↗
39. 10.1039/C6CP08592J10.1039/C6CP08592J ↗
40. Floudas G. · 2011
41. 10.1021/jz100154u10.1021/jz100154u ↗
42. 10.1021/mp200560910.1021/mp2005609 ↗
43. 10.1039/c2jm00037g10.1039/c2jm00037g ↗