journal article·2017-03-01Open access

Interface Defect Hydrogen Depassivation and Capacitance–Voltage Hysteresis of Al2O3/InGaAs Gate Stacks

Kechao Tang, Felix Roberto Palumbo, Liangliang Zhang, Ravi Droopad, Paul C. McIntyre

Abstract

We investigate the effects of pre- and postatomic layer deposition (ALD) defect passivation with hydrogen on the trap density and reliability of Al 2 O 3 /InGaAs gate stacks. Reliability is characterized by capacitance–voltage hysteresis measurements on samples prepared using different fabrication procedures and having different initial trap densities. Despite its beneficial capability to passivate both interface and border traps, a final forming gas (H 2 /N 2 ) anneal (FGA) step is correlated with a significant hysteresis. This appears to be caused by hydrogen depassivation of defects in the gate stack under bias stress, supported by the observed bias stress-induced increase of interface trap density, and strong hydrogen isotope effects on the measured hysteresis. On the other hand, intentional air exposure of the InGaAs surface prior to Al 2 O 3 ALD increases the initial interface trap density ( D it ) but considerably lowers the hysteresis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Scientific and Technical Research Council, CONICET/GAIANN-CNEA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

National Technological University, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Ingram School of Engineering, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666, United States

Funding

United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation · Stanford University · Semiconductor Research Corporation

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1067710.1038/nature10677 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.480824310.1063/1.4808243 ↗
3. 10.1039/c4tc00572d10.1039/c4tc00572d ↗
4. 10.1063/1.339977610.1063/1.3399776 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.01210.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.012 ↗
6. 10.1109/LED.2012.220443110.1109/LED.2012.2204431 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2013.01.00210.1016/j.surfrep.2013.01.002 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.482525910.1063/1.4825259 ↗
9. 10.1021/am506351u10.1021/am506351u ↗
10. 10.1063/1.369809510.1063/1.3698095 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.481833010.1063/1.4818330 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.346781310.1063/1.3467813 ↗
13. 10.7567/APEX.7.04120210.7567/APEX.7.041202 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.328102710.1063/1.3281027 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.493610010.1063/1.4936100 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.354431010.1063/1.3544310 ↗
17. 10.1109/IEDM.2013.672464410.1109/IEDM.2013.6724644 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.sse.2013.04.02010.1016/j.sse.2013.04.020 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.475580410.1063/1.4755804 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.482406610.1063/1.4824066 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.486103310.1063/1.4861033 ↗
22. 10.1109/IEDM.2011.613162110.1109/IEDM.2011.6131621 ↗
23. 10.1109/TDMR.2013.228437610.1109/TDMR.2013.2284376 ↗
24. 10.1109/IRPS.2014.686109810.1109/IRPS.2014.6861098 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.370113310.1149/1.3701133 ↗
26. 10.1109/TED.2012.220525510.1109/TED.2012.2205255 ↗
27. 10.1109/TED.2012.219700010.1109/TED.2012.2197000 ↗
28. 10.1116/1.480247810.1116/1.4802478 ↗
29. 10.1557/mrs2009.13710.1557/mrs2009.137 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.6b1040210.1021/acsami.6b10402 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.491449210.1063/1.4914492 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.478411410.1063/1.4784114 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.366506110.1063/1.3665061 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.156746110.1063/1.1567461 ↗
35. 10.1109/TDMR.2007.91043810.1109/TDMR.2007.910438 ↗
36. 10.1109/16.65867410.1109/16.658674 ↗
37. 10.1109/55.81744110.1109/55.817441 ↗
38. 10.1149/06905.0053ecst10.1149/06905.0053ecst ↗
39. 10.1021/la048138910.1021/la0481389 ↗