Bridging the Gap in Ashby’s Map for Soft Material Properties for Tissue Engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
Ashby's map's role in rationally selecting materials for optimal performance is well-established in traditional engineering applications. However, there is a major gap in Ashby's maps in selecting materials for tissue engineering, which are very soft with an elastic modulus of less than 100 kPa. To fill the gap, we create an elastic modulus database to effectively connect soft engineering materials with biological tissues such as the cardiac, kidney, liver, intestine, cartilage, and brain. This soft engineering material mechanical property database is created for widely applied agarose hydrogels based on big-data screening and experiments conducted using ultra-low-concentration (0.01-0.5 wt %) hydrogels. Based on that, an experimental and analysis protocol is established for evaluating the elastic modulus of ultra-soft engineering materials. Overall, we built a mechanical bridge connecting soft matter and tissue engineering by fine-tuning the agarose hydrogel concentration. Meanwhile, a soft matter scale (degree of softness) is established to enable the manufacturing of implantable bio-scaffolds for tissue engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida 33174, United States
Biomedical Engineering Department, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida 33174, United States
Funding
Division of Engineering Education and Centers
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/ncpneph060010.1038/ncpneph0600 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.106921010.1126/science.1069210 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20090074610.1002/adma.200900746 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.2c0966510.1021/acsami.2c09665 ↗
5. 10.1002/admt.20210066910.1002/admt.202100669 ↗
6. 10.1002/anbr.20210007510.1002/anbr.202100075 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.01010.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.010 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10555-008-9173-410.1007/s10555-008-9173-4 ↗
9. Ashby M. F. · 2018
10. 10.1080/15476278.2015.101968710.1080/15476278.2015.1019687 ↗
11. 10.1039/c4tb01267d10.1039/c4tb01267d ↗
12. Ewoldt R. H. · 2015 · 20710.1007/978-1-4939-2065-5_6 ↗
13. 10.1371/journal.pone.020037710.1371/journal.pone.0200377 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41578-021-00381-110.1038/s41578-021-00381-1 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.02410.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.024 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.04.01710.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.04.017 ↗
17. 10.1371/journal.pone.020476510.1371/journal.pone.0204765 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.02310.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.023 ↗
19. 10.1089/neu.2006.016910.1089/neu.2006.0169 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.400016410.1115/1.4000164 ↗
21. 10.3390/bioengineering701000410.3390/bioengineering7010004 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.exer.2013.06.00410.1016/j.exer.2013.06.004 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10856-018-6066-010.1007/s10856-018-6066-0 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20160361210.1002/adma.201603612 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20080210610.1002/adma.200802106 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20130323310.1002/adma.201303233 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20120170810.1002/adfm.201201708 ↗
28. 10.1002/adhm.20190050610.1002/adhm.201900506 ↗
29. 10.1002/advs.20190034410.1002/advs.201900344 ↗
30. 10.1126/science.aav905110.1126/science.aav9051 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20190133510.1002/adfm.201901335 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.08510.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.085 ↗
33. 10.1021/cm503974g10.1021/cm503974g ↗
34. 10.1016/j.bios.2004.01.01510.1016/j.bios.2004.01.015 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20120371910.1002/adma.201203719 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20210618310.1002/adma.202106183 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20220021710.1002/adma.202200217 ↗
38. Agarwal, A.; Orikasa, K.; Bacca, N. Systems and Methods for Testing Mechanical Properties of Ultra-soft Materials. U.S. Patent 11,275,007 B1, 2021.