Ultrasparse View X-ray Computed Tomography for 4D Imaging
Source abstract
Abstract
X-ray computed tomography (CT) is a noninvasive, nondestructive approach to imaging materials, material systems, and engineered components in two and three dimensions. Acquisition of three-dimensional (3D) images requires the collection of hundreds or thousands of through-thickness X-ray radiographic images from different angles. Such 3D data acquisition strategies commonly involve suboptimal temporal sampling for in situ and operando studies (4D imaging). Herein, we introduce a sparse-view imaging approach, Tomo-NeRF, which is capable of reconstructing high-fidelity 3D images from <10 two-dimensional radiographic images. Experimental 2D and 3D X-ray images were used to test the reconstruction capability in two-view, four-view, and six-view scenarios. Tomo-NeRF is capable of reconstructing 3D images with a structural similarity of 0.9971–0.9975 and a voxel-wise accuracy of 81.83–89.59% from 2D experimentally obtained images. The reconstruction accuracy for the experimentally obtained images is less than the synthetic structures. Experimentally obtained images demonstrate a similarity of 0.9973–0.9984 and a voxel-wise accuracy of 84.31–95.77%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy · National Science Foundation
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.02550110.1103/PhysRevLett.117.025501 ↗
2. 10.1038/s42256-021-00322-110.1038/s42256-021-00322-1 ↗
3. 10.1371/journal.pone.022442610.1371/journal.pone.0224426 ↗
4. 10.1137/S003613990343600510.1137/S0036139903436005 ↗
5. 10.1038/s43586-021-00015-410.1038/s43586-021-00015-4 ↗
6. Quinto, E. T. In An Introduction to X-Ray Tomography and Radon Transforms , Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, 2006; Vol. 63, p 1.10.1090/psapm/063/2208234 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b0010610.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00106 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.10571010.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105710 ↗
9. 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.317713410.1109/TNNLS.2022.3177134 ↗
10. 10.3390/tomography805017910.3390/tomography8050179 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0016810.1021/acsnano.2c00168 ↗
12. Wu, Z.; Alorf, A.; Yang, T.; Li, L.; Zhu, Y. Robust X-ray Sparse-View Phase Tomography via Hierarchical Synthesis Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv:1901.10644. arXiv.org e-Print archive, 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.10644.
13. 10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z ↗
14. 10.1016/j.imed.2021.03.00310.1016/j.imed.2021.03.003 ↗
15. Doh W. H. · Surf. Sci. Tools Nanomater. Charact. · 2015 · 31710.1007/978-3-662-44551-8_9 ↗
16. Dong, X.; Vekhande, S.; Cao, G. In Sinogram Interpolation for Sparse-View Micro-Ct With Deep Learning Neural Network , Medical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical Imaging; SPIE, 2019; Vol. 10948, pp 692–698.
17. Lee, H.; Lee, J.; Cho, S. In View-Interpolation of Sparsely Sampled Sinogram Using Convolutional Neural NetworkMedical Imaging 2017: Image Processing ; SPIE, 2017; Vol. 10133, pp 617–624.10.1117/12.2254244 ↗
18. 10.1002/mp.1325810.1002/mp.13258 ↗
19. Gjesteby, L.; Yang, Q.; Xi, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, G. In Deep Learning Methods to Guide CT Image Reconstruction and Reduce Metal Artifacts , Medical Imaging 2017: Physics of Medical Imaging; SPIE, 2017; Vol. 10132, pp 752–758.10.1117/12.2254091 ↗
20. 10.1109/TRPMS.2018.286761110.1109/TRPMS.2018.2867611 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41598-018-25153-w10.1038/s41598-018-25153-w ↗
22. 10.1038/s42256-019-0095-310.1038/s42256-019-0095-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cma.2020.11304310.1016/j.cma.2020.113043 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41524-020-0340-710.1038/s41524-020-0340-7 ↗
25. Yu, A.; Ye, V.; Tancik, M.; Kanazawa, A. In Pixelnerf: Neural Radiance Fields From One or Few Images , Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021; pp 4578–4587.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00455 ↗
26. 10.1145/350325010.1145/3503250 ↗
27. Yu, W.; Yang, K.; Bai, Y.; Yao, H.; Rui, Y.Visualizing and Comparing Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv:1412.6631. arXiv.org e-Print archive, 2014. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6631.
28. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00348.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00348.x ↗
29. 10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01557-410.1016/S0168-583X(02)01557-4 ↗
30. Russo, P. Handbook of X-ray Imaging: Physics and Technology ; CRC Press, 2017 ; pp 23–24.10.1201/9781351228251 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.04.00110.1016/j.apradiso.2015.04.001 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.9b1546310.1021/acsami.9b15463 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0020-0255(96)00200-910.1016/S0020-0255(96)00200-9 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.02130610.1103/PhysRevE.74.021306 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.06.03210.1016/j.powtec.2014.06.032 ↗
36. 10.1038/3510469710.1038/35104697 ↗
37. 10.1038/ncomms128910.1038/ncomms1289 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.184110.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1841 ↗
39. 10.1038/2381910.1038/23819 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevE.105.01490410.1103/PhysRevE.105.014904 ↗
41. 10.1021/ie303313710.1021/ie3033137 ↗
42. Zheng, Y.; Hatzell, K. B. In Thermal-Economic Optimization of Moving Packed Bed Particle-to-Sco2 Heat Exchanger Using Particle Swarm Optimization , Energy Sustainability; American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2021; p V001T02A010.10.1115/ES2021-63435 ↗
43. Carbohsp. https://carboceramics.com/products/ceramic-proppant/carbohsp.
44. 10.1190/geo2018-0481.110.1190/geo2018-0481.1 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.03270210.1103/PhysRevA.75.032702 ↗
46. 10.1016/0370-1573(87)90080-910.1016/0370-1573(87)90080-9 ↗