journal article·2023-03-09

Machine Learning Enables Process Optimization of Aerosol Jet 3D Printing Based on the Droplet Morphology

Haining Zhang, Enhang Hong, Xindong Chen, Zhixin Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

Aerosol jet printing (AJP) is a promising noncontact direct ink writing technology that enables flexible and conformal electronic devices to be fabricated onto planar and nonplanar substrates with higher resolution and less waste. Despite possessing many advantages, the limited electrical performance of microelectronic devices caused by the poor printing quality is still the greatest hurdle to overcome for AJP technology. With the motivation to improve the printing quality, a novel hybrid machine learning method is proposed to analyze and optimize the AJP process based on the deposited droplet morphology in this study. The proposed method consists of classic machine learning approaches, including space-filling-based experimental design, clustering, classification, regression, and multiobjective optimization. In the proposed method, a two-dimensional (2D) design space is fully explored using a Latin hypercube sampling approach for experimental design, and a K-means clustering approach is employed to reveal the cause-effect relationship between the deposited droplet morphology and printed line characteristics. Following that, an optimal operating window with respect to the deposited droplet morphology is identified using a support vector machine to ensure the printing quality in a design space. Finally, to achieve high-controllability and sufficient-thickness droplets, Gaussian process regression is adopted to develop the process model of droplet geometrical properties, and the deposited droplet morphology is optimized under dual conflicting objectives of customizing the droplet diameter and maximizing droplet thickness. Different from previous printing quality optimization approaches, the proposed method enables a systemic investigation on the formation mechanisms of printed line characteristics, and the printing quality is fundamentally optimized based on the deposited droplet morphology. Moreover, data-driven-based characteristics can help the proposed approach serve as a guideline for printing quality optimization in other noncontact direct ink writing technologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Information Engineering, Suzhou University, Suzhou 234000, China

School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 639798 Singapore

School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China

Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

China Aerospace Times Feihong Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100854, China

Funding

Suzhou University · Anhui Provincial Department of Education · Major Projects of Natural Science Research in Universities of Anhui Province

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0536810.1021/acsnano.6b05368 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.9b0458910.1021/acsami.9b04589 ↗
3. 10.1021/la503180a10.1021/la503180a ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20140105210.1002/adma.201401052 ↗
5. 10.1002/aelm.20150014510.1002/aelm.201500145 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0061610.1021/acsaelm.0c00616 ↗
7. 10.1021/nn204460910.1021/nn2044609 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-020-19324-510.1038/s41467-020-19324-5 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00170-019-03438-210.1007/s00170-019-03438-2 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.9b1506010.1021/acsami.9b15060 ↗
11. 10.1109/TED.2016.252238810.1109/TED.2016.2522388 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.12.12710.1016/j.snb.2017.12.127 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssensors.8b0129310.1021/acssensors.8b01293 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20200664710.1002/adma.202006647 ↗
15. 10.1021/am401200y10.1021/am401200y ↗
16. 10.1109/JSEN.2018.284213910.1109/JSEN.2018.2842139 ↗
17. 10.1002/aelm.20170005710.1002/aelm.201700057 ↗
18. 10.1021/am200907k10.1021/am200907k ↗
19. 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.06.04210.1016/j.solmat.2012.06.042 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.03410.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.034 ↗
21. 10.1088/0022-3727/47/11/11550410.1088/0022-3727/47/11/115504 ↗
22. 10.1007/s40964-021-00165-710.1007/s40964-021-00165-7 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.403666010.1115/1.4036660 ↗
24. 10.1021/am400606y10.1021/am400606y ↗
25. 10.5370/JEET.2012.7.1.9110.5370/JEET.2012.7.1.91 ↗
26. Wang, K.; Chang, Y.H.; Zhang, C.; Wang, B. Evaluation of Quality of Printed Strain Sensors for Composite Structural Health Monitoring Applications. In Proceedings of the SAMPE Fall Technical Conference on Advancement of Material and Process Engineering 2013, pp. 21−24.
27. 10.5545/sv-jme.2013.99910.5545/sv-jme.2013.999 ↗
28. 10.1021/ie503636c10.1021/ie503636c ↗
29. 10.1021/am400632s10.1021/am400632s ↗
30. Akhatov, I. S.; Hoey, J. M.; Thompson, D.; Lutfurakhmanov, A.; Mahmud, Z.; Aerosol flow through a microcapillary. In ASME second international conference on micro/nanoscale heat and mass transfer, 2009, pp. 223−232.10.1115/MNHMT2009-18421 ↗
31. 10.1002/adem.20170108410.1002/adem.201701084 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10309010.1016/j.addma.2022.103090 ↗
33. 10.1115/1.404995810.1115/1.4049958 ↗
34. 10.1088/2058-8585/aa5af910.1088/2058-8585/aa5af9 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11677910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116779 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.08.02310.1016/j.matt.2020.08.023 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10462-020-09876-910.1007/s10462-020-09876-9 ↗
38. 10.1115/1.404061910.1115/1.4040619 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.1c2204810.1021/acsami.1c22048 ↗
40. 10.1088/2058-8585/ac5a3910.1088/2058-8585/ac5a39 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.00410.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.004 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10091410.1016/j.apmt.2020.100914 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.00410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.004 ↗
44. 10.1109/LRA.2017.271324210.1109/LRA.2017.2713242 ↗
45. 10.1115/1.403558610.1115/1.4035586 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.9b0289810.1021/acsami.9b02898 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cej.2009.11.00210.1016/j.cej.2009.11.002 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.01110.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011 ↗
49. Burges, C. J. C. A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition Data mining and knowledge discovery 1998. 2(2), pp. 121−167.10.1023/A:1009715923555 ↗
50. Bousquet O. · 2004
51. 10.1038/s41467-020-18103-610.1038/s41467-020-18103-6 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41467-020-20284-z10.1038/s41467-020-20284-z ↗
53. 10.1038/ncomms597510.1038/ncomms5975 ↗
54. 10.1007/BF0017535410.1007/BF00175354 ↗
55. 10.1109/TEVC.2013.228153510.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsami.1c0454410.1021/acsami.1c04544 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.07.01110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.07.011 ↗