journal article·2023-01-18Open access

Structure-Based Design of Dual Bactericidal and Bacteria-Releasing Nanosurfaces

Daniel Salatto, Zhixing Huang, Peter Todd Benziger, Jan-Michael Y. Carrillo, Yashasvi Bajaj, Aiden Gauer, Leonidas Tsapatsaris, Bobby G. Sumpter, Ruipeng Li, Mikihito Takenaka, Wei Yin, David G. Thanassi, Maya Endoh, Tadanori Koga

Abstract

Here, we report synergistic nanostructured surfaces combining bactericidal and bacteria-releasing properties. A polystyrene- block -poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS- block -PMMA) diblock copolymer is used to fabricate vertically oriented cylindrical PS structures (“PS nanopillars”) on silicon substrates. The results demonstrate that the PS nanopillars (with a height of about 10 nm, size of about 50 nm, and spacing of about 70 nm) exhibit highly effective bactericidal and bacteria-releasing properties (“dual properties”) against Escherichia coli for at least 36 h of immersion in an E. coli solution. Interestingly, the PS nanopillars coated with a thin layer (≈3 nm thick) of titanium oxide (TiO 2 ) (“TiO 2 nanopillars”) show much improved dual properties against E. coli (a Gram-negative bacterium) compared to the PS nanopillars. Moreover, the dual properties emerge against Listeria monocytogenes (a Gram-positive bacterium). To understand the mechanisms underlying the multifaceted property of the nanopillars, coarse-grained molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a lipid bilayer (as a simplified model for E. coli ) in contact with a substrate containing hexagonally packed hydrophilic nanopillars were performed. The MD results demonstrate that when the bacterium–substrate interaction is strong, the lipid heads adsorb onto the nanopillar surfaces, conforming the shape of a lipid bilayer to the structure/curvature of nanopillars and generating high stress concentrations within the membrane (i.e., the driving force for rupture) at the edge of the nanopillars. Membrane rupture begins with the formation of pores between nanopillars (i.e., bactericidal activity) and ultimately leads to the membrane withdrawal from the nanopillar surface (i.e., bacteria-releasing activity). In the case of Gram-positive bacteria, the adhesion area to the pillar surface is limited due to the inherent stiffness of the bacteria, creating higher stress concentrations within a bacterial cell wall. The present study provides insight into the mechanism underlying the “adhesion-mediated” multifaceted property of nanosurfaces, which is crucial for the development of next-generation antibacterial surface coatings for relevant medical applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York11794-2275, United States

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York11794-5222, United States

Center for Infectious Diseases, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York11794-5120, United States

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee37831, United States

National Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York11973, United States

Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto611-0011, Japan

Department of Biomedical engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York11794-5281, United States

Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York11794-3400, United States

Funding

Division of Graduate Education · Kyoto University · Division of Materials Research

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Greene L. · 2008
2. 10.1128/CMR.00019-0710.1128/CMR.00019-07 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41579-020-0414-z10.1038/s41579-020-0414-z ↗
4. 10.1002/smll.20120052810.1002/smll.201200528 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.04610.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.046 ↗
6. 10.1039/C8NR00439K10.1039/C8NR00439K ↗
7. 10.1038/srep4111810.1038/srep41118 ↗
8. 10.1186/s12951-017-0328-810.1186/s12951-017-0328-8 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.11110.1016/j.msec.2017.05.111 ↗
10. 10.1007/s40820-017-0186-910.1007/s40820-017-0186-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.08.01110.1016/j.jtbi.2015.08.011 ↗
12. 10.1039/C5CP05646B10.1039/C5CP05646B ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.191668011710.1073/pnas.1916680117 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-020-15471-x10.1038/s41467-020-15471-x ↗
15. 10.1021/nl403201a10.1021/nl403201a ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.7b0570710.1021/acsami.7b05707 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.2c0325810.1021/acsami.2c03258 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0009010.1021/acsanm.8b00090 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.1c1648710.1021/acsami.1c16487 ↗
20. 10.1557/mrs2005.24910.1557/mrs2005.249 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mser.2004.12.00310.1016/j.mser.2004.12.003 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0059710.1021/acs.macromol.9b00597 ↗
23. 10.1021/nn304122b10.1021/nn304122b ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c0036710.1021/acs.analchem.0c00367 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.110658710.1126/science.1106587 ↗
26. 10.1021/ma500348510.1021/ma5003485 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.26550110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.265501 ↗
28. 10.1021/ma401601f10.1021/ma401601f ↗
29. 10.12693/APhysPolA.116.58510.12693/APhysPolA.116.585 ↗
30. 10.2147/IJN.S14806510.2147/IJN.S148065 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.017 ↗
32. 10.1116/1.479838510.1116/1.4798385 ↗
33. 10.1021/es505042510.1021/es5050425 ↗
34. 10.1128/aem.57.7.1969-1973.199110.1128/aem.57.7.1969-1973.1991 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0026410.1021/acsaem.9b00264 ↗
36. 10.1116/1.497904710.1116/1.4979047 ↗
37. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070511-15504610.1146/annurev-matsci-070511-155046 ↗
38. 10.1107/S002188980900222210.1107/S0021889809002222 ↗
39. 10.1021/la104619410.1021/la1046194 ↗
40. 10.1155/2019/783525310.1155/2019/7835253 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b0527210.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05272 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.02110.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.021 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b0096810.1021/acs.jctc.6b00968 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.213578510.1063/1.2135785 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.45854110.1063/1.458541 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0123910.1021/acs.macromol.1c01239 ↗
47. 10.1128/aem.46.1.90-97.198310.1128/aem.46.1.90-97.1983 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00004-010.1016/S0001-8686(02)00004-0 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0001-8686(98)00087-610.1016/S0001-8686(98)00087-6 ↗
50. 10.1039/C7SM02279D10.1039/C7SM02279D ↗
51. 10.1002/polc.507034010510.1002/polc.5070340105 ↗
52. 10.1116/1.489533410.1116/1.4895334 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01033-610.1016/S0378-4371(02)01033-6 ↗
54. 10.1021/ie50320a02410.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
55. 10.1021/nn405621w10.1021/nn405621w ↗
56. 10.1021/nl904224610.1021/nl9042246 ↗
57. 10.1039/b301481a10.1039/b301481a ↗
58. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0229310.1021/acsnano.8b02293 ↗
59. 10.1038/ncomms383810.1038/ncomms3838 ↗
60. 10.1038/nrmicro134010.1038/nrmicro1340 ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b0096810.1021/acs.jctc.6b00968 ↗
62. 10.1128/AEM.65.4.1564-1569.199910.1128/AEM.65.4.1564-1569.1999 ↗
63. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.13243410.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.132434 ↗
64. 10.1038/nmat85610.1038/nmat856 ↗
65. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b0034610.1021/acs.biochem.7b00346 ↗
66. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c0043710.1021/acs.jcim.2c00437 ↗
67. 10.1002/anie.20080517910.1002/anie.200805179 ↗
68. 10.1038/nmat434210.1038/nmat4342 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.02210.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.022 ↗