Differences in the Interfacial Mechanical Properties of Thiophosphate and Argyrodite Solid Electrolytes and Their Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Interfacial mechanics are a significant contributor to the performance and degradation of solid-state batteries. Spatially resolved measurements of interfacial properties are extremely important to effectively model and understand the electrochemical behavior. Herein, we report the interfacial properties of thiophosphate (Li3PS4)- and argyrodite (Li6PS5Cl)-type solid electrolytes. Using atomic force microscopy, we showcase the differences in the surface morphology as well as adhesion of these materials. We also investigate solvent-less processing of hybrid electrolytes using UV-assisted curing. Physical, chemical, and structural characterizations of the materials highlight the differences in the surface morphology, chemical makeup, and distribution of the inorganic phases between the argyrodite and thiophosphate solid electrolytes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electrification & Energy Infrastructure Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
Bredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, United States
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
Funding
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · Laboratory Directed Research and Development
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.11210.1038/nenergy.2016.112 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.192.4244.112610.1126/science.192.4244.1126 ↗
3. 10.1002/advs.20170032210.1002/advs.201700322 ↗
4. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0266810.1021/acsenergylett.9b02668 ↗
6. Dixit M. · 2022 · 39
7. 10.1039/d1ee00638j10.1039/d1ee00638j ↗
8. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0044510.1021/acsenergylett.1c00445 ↗
9. 10.1595/205651318X69674710.1595/205651318X696747 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41560-020-0565-110.1038/s41560-020-0565-1 ↗
11. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.10310.1038/natrevmats.2016.103 ↗
12. Ulvestad, A. A Brief Review of Current Lithium Ion Battery Technology and Potential Solid State Battery Technologies; 2018.
13. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.11.01310.1016/j.chempr.2018.11.013 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20200075110.1002/adma.202000751 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.03010.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.030 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0010110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.9b0267510.1021/acsami.9b02675 ↗
18. 10.1002/batt.20200014710.1002/batt.202000147 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0157310.1021/acsenergylett.1c01573 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0205310.1021/acsaem.0c02053 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.09.01810.1016/j.matt.2020.09.018 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.01510.1016/j.joule.2019.11.015 ↗
23. 10.1039/c7ta02730c10.1039/c7ta02730c ↗
24. 10.1039/c8ee00907d10.1039/c8ee00907d ↗
25. 10.1016/j.elecom.2020.10673810.1016/j.elecom.2020.106738 ↗
26. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab8f5b10.1149/1945-7111/ab8f5b ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.05.00410.1016/j.ensm.2019.05.004 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41563-020-00903-210.1038/s41563-020-00903-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.trechm.2019.06.01310.1016/j.trechm.2019.06.013 ↗
30. 10.1039/c9ta11508k10.1039/c9ta11508k ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20190095010.1002/adfm.201900950 ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20210132610.1002/smll.202101326 ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20190331110.1002/aenm.201903311 ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20160201110.1002/aenm.201602011 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0241410.1021/acsaem.1c02414 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.0c0168110.1021/acsami.0c01681 ↗
37. 10.1038/srep0226110.1038/srep02261 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0385410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03854 ↗
39. 10.2109/jcersj2.121.94610.2109/jcersj2.121.946 ↗
40. 10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2019.04.19110.1016/J.CERAMINT.2019.04.191 ↗
41. 10.1016/J.JEURCERAMSOC.2018.02.03210.1016/J.JEURCERAMSOC.2018.02.032 ↗
42. 10.1039/c7ta03199h10.1039/c7ta03199h ↗
43. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0121410.1021/acsenergylett.0c01214 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12703110.1016/j.cej.2020.127031 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10548010.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105480 ↗
46. 10.1116/1.498715110.1116/1.4987151 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13555310.1016/j.electacta.2019.135553 ↗
48. 10.1021/nn305648j10.1021/nn305648j ↗
49. 10.1007/s41918-020-00062-710.1007/s41918-020-00062-7 ↗
50. 10.1002/aenm.20200021910.1002/aenm.202000219 ↗
51. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/32/32540210.1088/0957-4484/23/32/325402 ↗
52. 10.1002/aenm.20190399310.1002/aenm.201903993 ↗
53. Bruker PeakForce QNM User Guide User Guide; 2011.
54. 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-110.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1 ↗
55. 10.1002/aenm.20180093310.1002/aenm.201800933 ↗
56. 10.1007/s41918-020-00081-410.1007/s41918-020-00081-4 ↗
57. 10.1039/C5CP01841B10.1039/C5CP01841B ↗
58. 10.1016/J.ENSM.2021.12.00810.1016/J.ENSM.2021.12.008 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13209410.1016/j.cej.2021.132094 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsami.9b1546310.1021/acsami.9b15463 ↗
61. 10.1039/c9ta05118j10.1039/c9ta05118j ↗
62. 10.1021/acsami.9b1450610.1021/acsami.9b14506 ↗
63. 10.1016/J.PHYSB.2011.02.01010.1016/J.PHYSB.2011.02.010 ↗
64. 10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2013.12.02210.1016/J.MEMSCI.2013.12.022 ↗
65. 10.1016/J.JNONCRYSOL.2012.08.02210.1016/J.JNONCRYSOL.2012.08.022 ↗
66. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0024910.1021/acsenergylett.8b00249 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41467-022-29596-810.1038/s41467-022-29596-8 ↗
68. 10.1039/C7TA07255D10.1039/C7TA07255D ↗
69. 10.1149/2.0191805jes10.1149/2.0191805jes ↗
70. 10.1149/2.0141914jes10.1149/2.0141914jes ↗
71. 10.1002/aenm.20170265710.1002/aenm.201702657 ↗