Mechanically Robust Irradiation, Atomic Oxygen, and Static-Durable CrOx/CuNi Coatings on Kapton Serving as Space Station Solar Cell Arrays
Source abstract
Abstract
The polymers that served for solar cell arrays are constantly subject to various hazards, such as atomic oxygen (AO), ion irradiation, or electrostatic discharge (ESD) events. To address these issues, we fabricated and sifted CrO0.16/CuNi-coated Kapton with a gradient structure with the goal of reaching an equilibrium between AO durability and resistance. The resulting material exhibits an impressively low Ey of 6.61 × 10–26 cm3 atom–1, 2.20% of which was detected as pristine Kapton. Self-evolution of the CrO0.16 coating under 525.4 displacement per atom (dpa) Fe+ ion irradiation indicated that it can still maintain a good state of ultrafine nanocrystalline in addition to local amorphization. Its AO-based degradation and irradiation evolution are demonstrated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. It is mechanically robust enough to endure the cyclic folding treatments attributed to its gradient structure fabrication. Moreover, the CrO0.16/CuNi-coated Kapton exhibits alleviated electrostatic accumulation capability and sufficient conductivity. Our strategy has promising potential for creating surface protection on flexible polymers operating in the low Earth orbit (LEO).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Science and Technology Major Project
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0188210.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01882 ↗
2. 10.1002/adsu.20210002510.1002/adsu.202100025 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20180385410.1002/adma.201803854 ↗
4. 10.1021/am402957s10.1021/am402957s ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20180773810.1002/adma.201807738 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41563-018-0184-410.1038/s41563-018-0184-4 ↗
7. 10.1021/am100217m10.1021/am100217m ↗
8. 10.1016/j.elstat.2018.02.00210.1016/j.elstat.2018.02.002 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.5b0220010.1021/acsami.5b02200 ↗
10. 10.1002/app.4844110.1002/app.48441 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.1c1380710.1021/acsami.1c13807 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.05410.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.054 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.05.00210.1016/j.corsci.2017.05.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.06.02410.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.06.024 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.05.07710.1016/j.apsusc.2010.05.077 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.10410.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.104 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12758210.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127582 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.10849410.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108494 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.aah404610.1126/science.aah4046 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.1c1810010.1021/acsami.1c18100 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.10115610.1016/j.surfin.2021.101156 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.06410.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.064 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00635-610.1016/S0257-8972(00)00635-6 ↗
24. Visentine, J. T.; Leger, L. J. Material Interactions with the Low Earth Orbital Environment Accurate Reaction Rate Measurements. In Proceedings of the NASA Workshop on Atomic Oxygen Effects; Jet Propulsion Lab, 1985; pp 1–10.10.2514/6.1985-7019 ↗
25. de Groh, K. K.; Banks, B. A.; McCarthy, C. E. Spacecraft Polymers Atomic Oxygen Durability Handbook; NASA-HDBK-6024; NASA, 2014; pp 6−12.
26. 10.1016/0257-8972(96)02855-110.1016/0257-8972(96)02855-1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.05710.1016/j.polymer.2015.06.057 ↗
28. Wang J. Y. · At. Energy Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 42 · 229
29. 10.1021/jp412102910.1021/jp4121029 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b0378310.1021/acs.jpca.5b03783 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.06.01610.1016/j.actaastro.2021.06.016 ↗
32. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.1110.1038/npjcompumats.2015.11 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.09830110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.098301 ↗
34. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0176610.1021/acscatal.5b01766 ↗
35. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
36. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0364-5916(02)00005-610.1016/S0364-5916(02)00005-6 ↗
38. Baker H. · 2002
39. 10.1016/S0966-9795(02)00032-810.1016/S0966-9795(02)00032-8 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0167-9317(97)00076-210.1016/S0167-9317(97)00076-2 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.15174010.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151740 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.05410.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.054 ↗
43. 10.2320/matertrans.46.87210.2320/matertrans.46.872 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.281270110.1063/1.2812701 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.11.03910.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.11.039 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41467-019-12451-810.1038/s41467-019-12451-8 ↗
47. 10.1021/am507281710.1021/am5072817 ↗